Dear Mr. President, With All Due Respect »

Posted By berkeley 10 months, 1 week ago in Political News

With all due respect Mr. President, Tim Geithner and Ben Bernanke are offering the same policies as President Bush and Secretary Paulson. Those policies are to bail out banks regardless of cost to taxpayers. Mr. President, it's hard enough to overlook Geithner's tax indiscretions. Mr. President, it is harder still. if not impossible, to ignore the fact that neither Geithner nor Bernanke saw this coming. Yet amazingly they are both **** sure of the solution. Even more amazing is the fact that solution changes every day.

Read Full Story at globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com »

405 Views Share Story 31 Comments Report

Submitted By:
berkeley

If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. Of all the enemies to public ...

Who Also Submitted: All »
Other Related Articles: All »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 31 (view all)
- Display
  • 67%
    4thchance10 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Change we can beleive in!
    BIG change, as in, it's such a big change from the Bush administration, that it's the same!

    I think it so funny how all you drones were so hot to vote for Obama. Obama promised change, but not one time did he ever define what that change was or was going to be. You see, only idiots vote for someone who does not say what their plans are. Yes, you're all idiot drones. Ahahahahahah, you got exactly what you voted for. You voted BLINDLY. Will you learn from this?
    No you wont, because you're all brain washed drone idiots.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • 63%
    4thchance10 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    More "Change" we can beleive in...
    Obama's Budget is nearing 4 trillion dollars now. Obama will triple the spending amount in One short Month of what Bush spent in 8 years. So, I have to ask, where is all the Democrat liberal OUTRAGE over Obama's spending? You democrat drones were going nuts over what Bush was spending. CAN WE SAY HYPOCRITES, I do beleive we have the right to be calling you liberal democrats HYPOCRITES of the worst kind. It's quite sickening actually.

    Do any of you have even the slightest clue to how much money 4 TRILLION DOLLARS is?

    let me put (4 TRILLION DOLLARS) it into some perspective, if that's even possible to do.

    lets say you had 4 TRILLION DOLLARS to spend. Lets say today you started spending 1 million dollars per day, EVERY DAY. 7 DAYS A WEEK, 365 DAYS A YEAR. Can you guess how many years it would take to spend 4 TRILLION DOLLARS, if you spent 1 million dollars per day every day?...are you ready for this.....it would take roughly 12,000 YEARS to spent 4 TRILLION DOLLARS at spending 1 million dollars per day. Don't beleive it, then do the MATH, you will see I'm correct. 12,000 FRICKIN' YEARS!

    YES, this administration is completely INSANE. Obama and gang are simply winging it, they have no idea what the F*** they are doing.

    If all this spending does not work to get the economy going again, there's no way Obama can blame ANYONE but HIMSELF. They are saying, Obama will spend more money over the next few months, then any one man has ever spend before in the history of planet earth. So, go ahead a try to blame Bush if all this spending fails to help the economy. This is Obama's baby and no one else's.

    God Help Us if it does not work. Since I'm a reluctant part of this generation who is spending all this money. I'd like to take this opportunity to apologize to the next few generations for this HUGE financial burden we're placing on them. I'm so very sorry for what our president is doing to you. I REALLY AM TRULY SORRY!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 29%
      jaern10 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Spoken like a true republican.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      7 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      nostalgia10 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      FTA:
      "Can you please tell us where you draw the line on taxpayer bailouts of Fannie Mae? Freddie Mac? AIG?"

      We have the answer
      Reuters: AIG, rescued twice last year by the US government, is asking for more aid and bracing for a fourth-quarter loss of roughly $60 billion

      Obama Administration is going to bail out Citigroup for a third time

      Fannie Seeks $15B After Posting Big Loss

      Bloomberg.com: Obama May Put Fannie, Freddie on Federal Budget, Orszag Says
      Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s $6.6 trillion of liabilities may be added to the federal budget once the Obama administration has time to review the potential consequences, White House budget director Peter Orszag said.

      President Barack Obama’s budget blueprint released yesterday didn’t incorporate the mortgage-finance companies, which the government seized in September, because economists haven’t had enough time to analyze the implications, Orszag said yesterday in a Bloomberg Television interview. He advocated adding the debt last year when he was running the Congressional Budget Office.

      Obama’s budget outline said Fannie and Freddie will need $173 billion in federal aid through 2011. Washington-based Fannie said yesterday it will draw $15.2 billion from a $200 billion emergency fund set up by the U.S. Treasury Department. McLean, Virginia-based Freddie, which has already received $13.8 billion in aid, said last month that it will need as much as $35 billion.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      6 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      quackpot10 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      NO way to balance the budget without:

      --stabilizing the economy and
      --cutting military spending, which amounts to over half of the income dollars spent.

      The jury is out on Obama's attempts to stabilize the economy.

      Obama's proposed budget, with an INCREASE in military spending, makes any thought of a balanced budget a joke.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      6 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      canadianrancher5710 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I hope this comment makes some sense to those who read it since it is a little different. I like to attend auction sales and figure that it is a good way of getting equipment at sometimes bargin prices, When the auctioneer asks for $100 for an item you don't jump up and bid right away, you sit and wait until the price drops to the very lowest level before you start thinking about bidding. This is what the government should have done with their stimulus plan, they should have waited until things shock themselves out before putting any money toward anything, it might of resulted in some really tough times but that is what it is going to take to change this situation around and I fear that a great deal of money has already been wasted that could have been better used if we had started at the bottom. I honestly believe that feeding the unemployed and underfed would have cost a lot less than what the government has been doing and that is feeding the overfed.
      It seems odd that the word CHANGE really has no meaning anymore, not for politicians or those who are receiving government money [the peoples money].

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        simonsez10 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Even Warren is concerned ...

        Commenting on the federal government's actions to resolve the economic crisis, Buffett said: "Economic medicine that was previously meted out by the cupful has recently been dispensed by the barrel. These once-unthinkable dosages will almost certainly bring on unwelcome aftereffects."

        http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Berkshires-B...

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        3 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Mutainia10 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        The first time I ever heard the sentence, "with all due respect", was on "Star Trek: The Next Generation".

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        View All 31 Comments

        Add a Comment

        Sign In With Your Propeller Account

        Forgot your password?

        Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

        To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.