« Back to story "McDonald's denies workers comp for shot employee"

Story Comments

Posted by: Dionys 9 months, 1 week ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 67%
    Dionys9 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    "So let me get this straight, it's McDonald's policy that their employees are not to help McDonald's CUSTOMERS, in their OWN store?"

    This is the policy of most places, corporate or not. We have police for a reason. If you want to violate your work policy to help someone else, that's great ethically and morally -- but don't expect the workplace which specifically told you to not do something to support you when you do it.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      lvrofwolves9 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Like I said, I'd like to read the wording on that policy.
      If he did in fact break a policy rule, they could fire him.
      He was representing McDonald's, now we know what they represent, regardless of the situation, follow our rules, and better believe we are going to cover our as s financially in every situation, regardless if your act is heroic or not.

      ok...McDonald's has spoken.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 75%
        BravoSierra9 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I disagree. Indeed, I think you cannot consider yourself anything but hypocritical to use the cross as your icon and support a 'legalistic' position.

        Act Utilitarianism based upon rules that are for the good of the many take precedence over rules that protect the interests of the corporation. The Golden Rule clearly takes precedence. And, there is a long tradition of morality in the US against McDonald's policy.

        "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Jesus Christ

        "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." Edmund Burke

        In the first case, you have an order from your God to intervene in a case like this and NOT push responsibility on to the police.

        In the second case, McDonald's policy and it's insurance company's policy are contrary to the social contract that is the United States and is thus invalid ab initio.

        As a former soldier, I can only tell you I despise people who say, "that's what we have police for", or "that's what we have soldiers for", etc.

        If all good men acted each time they saw a wrong being committed, there would not be the need for a single Medal of Honor to be given out. Because everyone in the room would have taken the perpetrator down with every weapon at their disposal.

        Personally, I'll have stuck a butcher knife through is throat from about 40 feet...the military taught me to do it to defend my nation in the abstract on foreign shore...I think I'm clearly in the right to do in in the concrete immediate and individual instance of protecting a citizen.

        Citizens must expect all corporations operating under US charter to establish policies that are legally consistent with the social contract of our society. Otherwise, the corporate policy is the moral and logical equivalent of an illegal order...and following it is wrong.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          Beau78909 months, 1 week ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Would you be arguing this if the employee didn't intervene, and the guy who hit the woman had returned with a gun and shot and killed the woman in the store?

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...

        Post Reply

        You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

        People Who Liked This Comment (2)

        People Who Didn't Like This Comment (1)