Story Comments
Posted by: Georgia50 9 months, 1 week ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
30%
Georgia509 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Dionys...
Reply
The missile shield gets closer and closer to reality as each year passes. As more is learned about the power needed to down a missile by a proximity weapon, and as guidance systems are refined to process data faster and faster, the window of error shrinks with nearly every test.
Do you deny this?
Hey libs...lets not deny Jimmy Carter his one chance to make a substantive contribution to America's defense. Now matter how angy the idea of actually defending America makes you, you gotta admit ol' Jimma was ahead of his time with his anti-missile proposal.
(Pardon me while I revel in the knowledge that all along you libs...in your brazen stupidity...thought this was orginally Ronnie's idea!)-
100%
CRYMTYPHON9 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I am trying to picture you reveling, Georgia;
Reply
I picture you doing a kind of boogie on the keyboard.
Yuck.
Liberals are in favor of defending America.
Many of us are even in favor of defending Poland and the Czech Republic,
although we don't confuse the two with the US.
The missile shield is a pointless, idiotic waste of money.
No one needs a missile to blow up a city.
Any country with a bomb can put it in a car and drive it anywhere they want.
A shipping container or a briefcase or a boat works nicely too.
Missiles are for military parades.
Obama is offering to trade what is worthless to us.
If the Russians take the offer, - no loss. -
100%
Dionys9 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
" The missile shield gets closer and closer to reality as each year passes. As more is learned about the power needed to down a missile by a proximity weapon, and as guidance systems are refined to process data faster and faster, the window of error shrinks with nearly every test."
Reply
"Do you deny this?"
I don't deny that missile systems that used to hit maybe 1 missile in 50 are possibly now capable of hitting 1 missile in 10 (at best) in controlled test situations. Even given a 90% accuracy, which is likely decades off at best an expensive missile shield won't do anything for America and will ramp up the ignition point between the US and Russia. -
Neutral
gamahuche9 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Whether "Ronnie" had many ideas beyond playing with his personal raygun is questionable.
Reply
There was a little boondoggle known as Starwars that appeared on his watch - perhaps while he was having his VERY long afternoon nap, trying to see off Rip van Winkle [how many years did that last] .
But then you're probably far too young and inexperienced to remember such details.
-
loading ...
Klarissa
icono1
stalemate
Ciera-Marie
cushi
gamahuche
dextrase
fsev41
CRYMTYPHON
DenCuddy
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.