Difference between Climate and Weather »

RSS Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 15 (view all)

- Display No Filter Fair Comments - 25% and above Good Comments - 50% and above Excellent Comments - 75% and above

• 100%

  myfairlady9 months ago

  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

  These conditions are expressed by a combination of several elements.

  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)

  Reply

  0 Replies

  loading ...
• 100%

  myfairlady9 months ago

  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

  These conditions are expressed by a combination of several elements.

  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)

  Reply

  0 Replies

  loading ...
• 25%

  slate9 months ago

  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

  Global warming! Global Warming! Opps look at that cold weather. Global Climate Change! Global Climate change!

  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)

  Reply

  3 Replies

  loading ...
  • 100%

    Tangent0019 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Actually, here in Denver we've had weeks of unusually warm weather with two days of record-setting high temperatures and the driest February on record (1/10 of an inch of precipitation). This is going on in much of the southwest. I think we've had only 3 or 4 days where the temperature dropped below 0.
    
    Even with the unusual weather in the US northeast, globally, January was the 7th warmest on record according to the NOAA.
    
    http://www.examiner.com/x-219-Denver-Weather-Exami...

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)

    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading ...
    • 0%

      slate8 months, 4 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I'd make sure they used January's number for those stats after some of the climate control folks have been caught using number from the wrong month to make claims in the recent past.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)

      Reply

      0 Replies

      loading ...
    • Neutral

      Sageparadox8 months, 4 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Dude, you so can not use Denver as any kind of example when it come to weather.
      
      I grew up there. Ive seen 60s in Jan-Feb and snow in July. I even once when into a movie with shorts and a tank top because it was warm in the 50s, when I came out of the movies it was almost a blizzard.
      
      To explain to some of you midwestern, like south western Ohioan what a blizzard actually is. A blizzard is not heavy snow that accumalates up to 2-3 feet over a few hours. A blizzard is blinding wet blowing snow that accumilates 3-4 feet in just one hour with 5-6 foot snow drifts. When we say your car is burried. We mean, you can not even find it.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)

      Reply

      0 Replies

      loading ...
• 86%

  lvrofwolves9 months ago

  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

  I've always understood 'global warming' to mean more then just warming. If it needs to be called global climate change so more people will understand, fine with me.

  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)

  Reply

  0 Replies

  loading ...

• capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user2 Replies

  • Tangent001Comment removed: Spam
  • 100%

    Tangent0019 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Spam because I put in 2 links? Sheesh!
    
    NOAA and NASA show no 'flatlining' in their global temperature data. It's unfortunate the Reilly article doesn't give a link to source material.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)

    Reply

    0 Replies

    loading ...

• capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user3 Replies

  • 80%

    Dionys9 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Oh. The sunspot conspiracy theorists are back?
    
    "Now this 11-year low in Sunspot activity has raised fears among a small but growing number of scientists that rather than getting warmer, the Earth could possibly be about to return to another cooling period."
    
    Small but growing number = 3 idiots that would still vote for Bush again.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)

    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading ...

    • capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user1 Reply

• paulangelComment removed: Spammer, Hard Banned

View All 15 Comments

More News