Rush to the President: Debate Me »

Posted By GLee 9 months ago in News

RUSH: It is on the record -- thanks to Politico.com -- since last fall, the White House, led by Rahm Emanuel, the chief of staff to Barack Obama, has been targeting me, your host, your harmless, lovable little fuzzball.  Their standard operating procedure: they need a demon to distract and divert from what their agenda is.  They need a demon about whom they can lie so as to persuade average Americans that they're the good guys, the benevolent good guys, and the mean SOBs are their enemies trying to stop this great young little president from doing miraculous and wonderful things. 

Read Full Story at rushlimbaugh.com »

1741 Views Share Story 216 Comments Report

Submitted By:
GLee

I am all about pulling the 'levers' to gain new leadership for the United States of America. The 'change' began in NJ and Virginia and ...

Who Also Submitted: All »
Other Related Articles: All »

Why not submit a story?

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Showing 210 of 216 Comments (view all)
- Display
  • 47%
    GLee9 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    This is a GIANT chance for our President to shut Rush's mouth once and for all. Will Obama accept?

    hehe

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    49 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 35%
    GLee9 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Talk about a 'studdering' mess......... it would be extremely entertaining. And NO teleprompters!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    19 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 31%
    Wolfie20079 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    As for Obama debating Limbaugh he wouldn't dare to take the chance. No matter what you might think of Rush or wish would happen in a debate between the Obama and Rush, Rush would eat Bamo's lunch.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    9 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 88%
    nostalgia9 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Here is the article on Politico.com

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/19596.ht...

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 44%
      icono19 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I've never listened to Rush that much but now I am very curious as to what Rush is saying to get the political panties at the White House in such a wad.

      True in that this weird social challenge by the White House may detract from what they, the Messiah-Crats, are truly doing but damn this 'move' is truly half baked and borders on extremely sophomoric at best.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
      • 91%
        StevieGee9 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Obama won't debate Rush. It's not Presidential to debate a talk show host.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        10 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 73%
        lfergie8129 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Limbaugh at the Crazy People Acting Crazy (CPAC) conference talking to a room of crazy people. Priceless. A group of wannabe politicians taking advice from a drug head chauvinist bigot. WOW

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        18 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 72%
        engineer9 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Why would Obama want to debate a piece of cr_p? Obama has more class than that!!

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        14 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 88%
        AdrianP9 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Wow.. didn't realize that there was so much "Rush Love" on this board.. LOL.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        3 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 87%
        NoWayMan9 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Obama won't get into the mud with this pig since this pig loves the mud.

        the office of president is too important for Obama to lower himself to an entertainer's level to have a "debate."

        its like michael moore asking bush to have a debate when bush was president. that would have been ridiculous.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        2 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 28%
        k9kssr9 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        NoWay,

        No, Obama won't get in the mud....he just slings it through Emmanuel, the press secretary, and the DNC. He's not got the testicular fortitude to do it himself.

        They think they are being clever using this as a diversionary tactic, but it will backfire.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        4 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 16%
        UncontrollableScaldingDiarrhea9 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Rush would beat TheOne is a debate faster than a Messianic appointee would pay back taxes after getting caught.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        7 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 50%
        cushi9 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        One of the 21 million subidi..er...supporters speak!

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          Sageparadox9 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Rush Limbaugh, you may make your opening comments:

          My milkshake brings all the boys to the yard,
          a delight,
          it's better than yours,
          damn right it's better than yours,
          I can teach you,
          but I have to charge.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 90%
            bubba29 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Rush will only "debate" IF he can control the location and the conditions and everything else.

            That is not a debate - it is a set-up.

            If Rush can't even manage to meet Obama at a neutral site for a REAL debate in person, then he is not worth the effort. (He's not worth the effort anyway ...)

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply

            3 Replies

            loading loading ...
          • 80%
            cloud159 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            You know despite how much the left hates him, Rush is a smart guy. Maybe not when it comes to politics or anything meaningful, but he knows how to run his business. This is a win win thing for Rush. Obama accepts (which he obviously won't) and Rush gets publicity on a whole new level, or Obama declines, which he will, and Rush gets to say "Oooo the President is scared to debate me!"

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply

            20 Replies

            loading loading ...
          • 100%
            bogswampmarsh9 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Rush is an over fed, out of touch, bigot who has OTHER people write his material. In a real debate situation, Obama would inhilate him. Remember who has the political background and the education. Although no matter what happened, Rush would declare victory. Cause, afterall, according to him, he is ALWAYS right...

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply

            4 Replies

            loading loading ...
          • 83%
            cityguy606409 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Hmmm... Let's see. Conservatives were in control of things for years and what do we have to show for it? We have economic upheaval, went from a budget surplus to a giant deficit and two poorly run wars. Add to that they promised to keep government out of our lives referring to the democrats policies as social engineering. But somehow they pushed their own agenda on us all.

            They promised to bring integrity back to government propping themselves up on a moral pedestal but came up short there as well. With scandals ranging from corruption to improper sexual conduct they proved to be no better than those they replaced. Newt Gingrich even admitted to having a adulterous relationship with an aide at the very same time he was impeaching President Clinton for covering up his own affair!

            Rush wants a debate? I don't think so. He won't even face a true debate on own his talk show. Rush has said time and again that the republicans have all the ideas. That moderates are irrelevant because they don't stand for any thing. (Meaning they're aren't locked into an ideology.) That liberal thinking is simply wrong. This intolerance to any opinion other than their own is why they failed and its why the republicans lost. The republicans saw the train coming at them and did nothing to get out of its way.

            If the republicans really want to get back into power they need to learn from their mistakes and adapt. Reagan was a popular president because even with his strong convictions he was respectful of his opposition. The current republican leadership needs to rethink its message reach out to the middle class and tone down the evangelical rhetoric. You can't govern just for your core constituency.

            Conservatives will argue that McCain was that attempt at moderation but even though his tone was conciliatory his policies were clearly stay the course. He failed to address the reality which was people were hurting. And when he finally did come around his ideas weren't very convincing.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply

            7 Replies

            loading loading ...
          • 10%
            drmario91429 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Don't get too distracted by this political circus. Judge him by the content of his character (policies) not by the color of his skin.......hmmmm Sounds logical. Rush tells the truth because he has nothing to loose (not a politician) and 20 million listeners. He is not the Rep leader just the voice of the public (the 48% that didn't vote for BHO and the rest that voted because he was black). President Obama will show his true color soon. Let's hope it's not too late to do something about it.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply

            1 Reply

            loading loading ...
          • 25%
            drmario91429 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Rush speaks the truth because he has nothing to loose (not a politician worried about re-election). I judge BHO by the content of his charater not his skin color....hmmm sounds familiar. Don't get distracted by this political circus. President Obama will show his true color soon. Let's just hope it's not too late to do anything about it.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply

            3 Replies

            loading loading ...
          • 70%
            scott42619 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Rush Limbaugh is so full of himself. He may have 20 million (largely AM radio angry white male) listeners...20 million out of a U.S. population of 303 million. The VAST majority of average Americans (Limbaugh has an 11% positive rating for those under 40) DO NOT like him.

            Intelligent people know other reasonable and sane voices are out there. Subscribers to satellite radio or surfers the internet (....or residents of a few major media markets where one can listen on terrestrial AM and FM broadcast outlets) have Thom Hartmann and Ed Schultz as more reasonable alternatives to Rush (...both are on the center-left and where we are as a country right now...)

            Unfortunately, right wing "news/talk" radio is now evident to be a Rush echo chamber ...starting with Sean Hannity, who obediently reiterates all of the talking points. And not to be outdone, self-proclaimed "independent" (yeah, right!) Bill O'Reilly puts his own psychotic "no-spin" spin on it (all the while, like Rush, trying to get the focus back on himself). And Michael (Weiner) Savage....well he's just clinically insane.....

            The longer that Rush is the "defacto leader of Republican Party," the more likely the GOP will lose more seats in the mid-term elections.

            You dittoheads don't believe me? We'll talk after the 2010 elections. Obama is proving to be doing what he actually campaigned on and his popularity is at 68% ...meanwhile, your party has become a circular firing squad with everyone trying to kiss up to that drug addled lard-ass!

            I say, let the GOP implode! I'm enjoying the show!

            ----

            Oh, and BTW...

            "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness..." is in the Declaration of Independence, Rush! NOT the Constitution (you know, the document you've been wiping your fat a** with?). Perhaps you DO need a teleprompter!

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • 100%
              bubba29 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              A bit off the subject but frustrating - more propeller incompetence --

              Has anyone else noticed that there are not "positive" (+) buttons next to the comments today?

              Now we can't give a positive to any posted comment?????

              I also get "internal server error" about 1/2 the time I am reloading/refreshing a page.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply

              2 Replies

              loading loading ...
            • 100%
              bubba29 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Figures ... as soon as I posted the above comment, the "Plus" signs (+) are showing up again ...

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              View All 216 Comments

              Add a Comment

              Sign In With Your Propeller Account

              Forgot your password?

              Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

              To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.