FDA-approved warning labels won't protect companies »

Posted By SenorCoconut 11 months, 1 week ago in Business & Finance

US court says people harmed by drugs can still sue.

Read Full Story at nature.com »

209 Views Share Story 15 Comments Report

Submitted By:
SenorCoconut

"Every patient carries her or his own doctor inside" - Albert Schweitzer.

Please excuse the erratic participation lately, but I'm still busy developing and updating ...

Who Also Submitted: All »
Other Related Articles: All »

Why not submit a story?

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 15 (view all)
- Display
  • 100%
    sarahturner11 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Good informative article SenorCoconut. Thank you....

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      myfairlady11 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      The Court holds that a state tort jury.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 50%
        nostalgia11 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        This is a case of medical malpractice

        FTA: The drug was mistakenly injected into an artery instead of a vein

        Looks like the attorneys for Diana Levine were going after the drug manufacturer because of "deep pockets"

        The FDA guidelines are very clear:
        The IV route, along with inadvertent intra-arterial (injecting into an artery mistakenly) or subcutaneous administration is most likely to result in significant complications, ranging from burning and pain to paralysis, tissue necrosis, and gangrene. Sometimes surgical intervention such as fasciotomy, skin graft or even amputation is needed
        the product labeling makes several recommendations to reduce the risk of these adverse events. They include giving the drug in concentrations no greater than 25 mg/mL, administering the drug at a rate no greater than 25 mg/minute, injecting the drug through the tubing of an infusion set that’s running and known to be working satisfactorily, and stopping the injection immediately if the patient reports burning in order to investigate whether there might be intra-arterial placement or perivascular extravasation.
        Stock promethazine only in the 25 mg/mL concentration (not the 50 mg/ml) since this is the highest concentration of promethazine that can be given IV.

        • Consider 6.25 to 12.5 mg of promethazine as the starting IV dose, especially for elderly patients.

        • Give the medication only through a large-bore vein and check the patency of the access site before administering.

        • Administer IV promethazine through a running IV line at the port furthest from the patient’s vein.

        • Consider administering IV promethazine over 10-15 minutes.

        • Before administering the drug, tell patients to let you know immediately if burning or pain occurs during or after the injection.

        Someone in the hospital was not following protocol

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        2 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Newperson11 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Thanks Senor very useful article

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          StevieGee11 months, 1 week ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          FDA drug labeling requirements are the minimum standard. As people use these drugs more is learned about them. Now drug companies are required to update their labeling when new information is available. This is a good call.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply

          2 Replies

          loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          willottica11 months, 1 week ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          I agree with the general ruling about the ability to sue drug makers if they are harmed by drugs. They should be responsible for ensuring that their product is safe when used as directed.

          However, I do not agree with the specific ruling in this case. The patient was not harmed by the drug, but by the medical practitioner who administered it incorrectly. The drug was used incorrectly.

          This is like suing the makers of Advil when someone suffers kidney failure because of an overdose.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply

          3 Replies

          loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          tadair91911 months, 1 week ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          fda is a joke anyway. it's like sticking a clown-sticker on your product.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 0%
            Endoscopy11 months, 1 week ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            This is a disaster for the Drug companies and a boon for the suit happy lawyers. This will raise the cost of drugs. All of the lawyer fees and losses in court will have to be paid by the people buying the drugs. And people were bitching about the cost of drugs because of the costs of creating a mostly safe drug for different problems.

            Get a copy of the Physicians' Desk Reference and look at the voluminous information there about possible side effects, prescribing information, and much more. Several pages on each drug. Will they have to put that as a brochure attached to the medicine? This is stupid.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            View All 15 Comments

            Add a Comment

            Sign In With Your Propeller Account

            Forgot your password?

            Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

            To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

            Submit a Story

            Advertisement

            Story Tags ?

            Real Estate Info

            Get the Latest Market Info for Your Area



            Foreclosures | Short Sale

            Luxury Homes | Homes for Sale

            First Time Home Buyer Advice



            Dropping This Article

            No one has dropped this story.

            Groups Watching This

            view all »

            Also Submitted By

            No one else has submitted this story.