Story Comments
Posted by: mesodude 9 months, 3 weeks ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
67%
mesodude9 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I prefer watching the *really* happy Republican Party in action:
Reply
"Choo! Choo! The Run Michael Steele Out of D.C. Express has left the station, led by Dr. Ada Fisher, North Carolina's national committeewoman. Fisher, a retired physician who is one of three black national GOP committee members, emailed a note to members of Steele's transition team saying Steele is "eroding confidence" in the GOP. She called the tiff between Steele and Rush Limbaugh a "Republican Horror Show." Indeed, the mind reels at that imagery."
--ruh-rohhh, pc--looks like the GOP implosion continues and silly braindead Propeller cons are still diddling themselves and running around in a circle like idiots--because you freaking lost! ROTFLMAO ;-P
"It would be a good idea if Mr. Steele would step aside," she told Rachel Maddow Thursday night. When Maddow asked Fisher if she held a grudge against Steele because she supported South Carolina GOP Chairman Katon Dawson for chair, Fisher said. "I don't have a public grudge against anyone."
--what parts of your body are tingling now, neoclown pinheads? ;-P
Top GOPer: Steele should resign ... no, it wasn't Rush
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?...-
-
60%
mesodude9 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Thanks, cloudy. I like when cons here boldly live up their reputation as some of the most poorly educated people on the planet. Let's see if you can follow along, my little pea-brained neocon buddy...
Reply
You cons are here piling onto Obama for "hypocrisy" regarding earmarks when you support the GOP--which has 40% of the pork in this bill they're so disingenuously p*ssing and moaning about. That makes them what, pea-brain? Hypocrites, right? That makes you what, uneducated one? A hypocrite who is extremely slow. Read it over carefully, cloudy. And *sound* out any words containing more than one syllable. You can do it. ;-P-
64%
cloud159 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Now now now meso.....I would think by now you would know that I'm not a "con" nor do I support the GOP. Its silly to align with one party or the other because they both fall victim to the same fatal flaw of partisanship.
Reply
Now lets get to your point that the GOP is a group of hypocrites. You're 100% right. But why limit it to the GOP when its across the board? As for the GOP's hypocrisy being relevant to the topic of Obama being a hypocrite; there you are wrong. I see it time and time again on here. One side says the other is bad, the other says that they are worse. It is NOT a valid argument. Its a diversion away from the original topic. Its an attempt to take the focus off the issue being discussed and it shows either that you don't want to discuss the topic, or that you have ADD. If you want to discuss the GOP's hypocrisy, go post in one of the various stories talking about it. Or perhaps post your own story.
You may consider yourself to be an "intellectual" meso, but by grouping everyone that doesn't fall in line with your views as a "con" or GOP supporter really doesn't convey that.
Don't worry Meso, you'll get it someday, then you can come join us at the big boy table. ; )-
67%
mesodude9 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Now now now meso.....I would think by now you would know that I'm not a "con" nor do I support the GOP. Its silly to align with one party or the other because they both fall victim to the same fatal flaw of partisanship."
Reply
--Are you sure about that, cloudy? Let see...Out of the 15 articles that appear on the first page of your Propped articles:
Welcome to Obama’s “New Era of Peace”: 22 Pakistanis killed
Obama's False Medicare Claim
IS GOD A MATHEMATICIAN?
Obama in the mud: So much for honesty
Chuck Norris Smacks Down Huffington and Obama
How Keith Olbermann Could Cost Obama the Election
McCain Moves Ahead of Obama, Poll Says
Gallup Daily: McCain Moves Ahead, 48% to 45%
--and among the handful of articles you've posted (as cloudy, that is):
Palin Power: Fresh Face Now More Popular Than Obama, McCain »
Obama misleads the public over McCain's comments
McCain up 5% amongst likely voters in new Reuters/Zogby poll
--Nope, no reason at all to think you're a partisan con. None at all, cloudy. ;-P -
60%
mesodude9 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Now lets get to your point that the GOP is a group of hypocrites. You're 100% right. But why limit it to the GOP when its across the board? As for the GOP's hypocrisy being relevant to the topic of Obama being a hypocrite; there you are wrong."
Reply
--Well, that actually *wasn't* my point (and you accuse me of having ADD) but since you insist on defending the indefensible...My point was that it's moronic to suggest that I'm not focused on the topic when the topic is hypocrisy. The fact that *you* apparently decided that we're only supposed to focus on Obama's hypocrisy (when the very story itself is hypocritical) is ludicrous.
"As for the GOP's hypocrisy being relevant to the topic of Obama being a hypocrite; there you are wrong. "
--No, *you're* wrong. How in your mind is it inappropriate to point out that, in light of the GOP's 40% contribution of pork spending, an article condemning Obama's hypocrisy on earmarks is itself hypocritical? That's insane.
"I see it time and time again on here. One side says the other is bad, the other says that they are worse."
--But that argument doesn't apply here because I haven't claimed Republicans are worse on earmark spending (in fact, vis a vis this bill, I've admitted they aren't quite as bad as Democrats) I'm only pointing out how silly it is to slam Dems on earmarks when Republicans are responsible for 40% of the pork in the bill. Why do I have to spoonfeed you something so obvious?
"It is NOT a valid argument. Its a diversion away from the original topic. Its an attempt to take the focus off the issue being discussed and it shows either that you don't want to discuss the topic, or that you have ADD."
--That's because you make an illogical leap (that I'm making excuses for the Democrats) when I'm merely pointing out that accusing Dems of hypocrisy on earmarks is itself hypocritical given that Republicans are responsbile for 40% of the pork in the bill. I'm not arguing that one side is better or worse--only that the point of the story or video or whatever is silly because Republicans are major pork spenders as well.
Having said that, Chris Matthews has a point about Obama. Cons do NOT have a point about Obama because, again, the GOP is contributing much of the pork in the bill.
"You may consider yourself to be an "intellectual" meso, but by grouping everyone that doesn't fall in line with your views as a "con" or GOP supporter really doesn't convey that."
--Please...I'm brilliant but can we *please* stay focused on the story and the fact that cons are out of their freaking minds to be complaining about pork after the last 8 years? Can we not talk about me being extremely intelligent for ONE day?! Is that too much to ask? ;-x
-
-
-
-
-
loading ...
Ciera-Marie
cushi
david_nwpa
ForrestPhelps
jovial
fsev41
GWHayduke
DenCuddy
bluetexasvalley
hefaa1
FrauBlucher
Shixa
Klarissa
slate
Wolfie2007
gwhiddon
FairNBalanced
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.