Nader Wins First Amendment Ballot Access Case | Politicususa »

Posted By capj71 9 months, 2 weeks ago in Political News

The Supreme Court today declined to hear an appeal of a case brought by Ralph Nader against the state of Arizona, and its law requiring Independent candidates to register earlier than candidates affiliated with the two political parties.

Read Full Story at politicususa.com »

346 Views Share Story 28 Comments Report

Submitted By:
capj71

Hi I am Capj71, but my friends call me Jason. I love politics. I am a liberal, and proud of it. I share and prop ...

Who Also Submitted: All »
Other Related Articles: All »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 28 (view all)
- Display
  • 100%
    berkeley9 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    the monopoly that the dems and repubs almost have just hit a roadblock. we all have benefited from the efforts of ralph nader.

    some form of instant runoff or proportional voting is the most critical change that will end their power, and they will fight it to the end.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    12 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 75%
    aceofspades19 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    While I agree with the ruling in fairness to all - I wonder how it would have gone had not the egotistic Nader not been the spoiler in 2000

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    4 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    tadair9199 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    How can anyone not love Nader's integrity? If lightning struck Bush and Gore in 2000, we may have ended up with a terrific country.

    Not because I agree with all of Nader's policies, but because he passes the litmus test. Him and Kucinich are the amongst the best liberals out there.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    tadair9199 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Google "Instant-runoff voting." Spain's parliament uses it. The Liberterian party uses it. County central committees use it to elect officers. But, for some reason, our national elections don't use it. They don't want third-parties. They want us to be brainless and polarized good little R's or D's. They don't want us to think. They want us to think that it isn't the system that is spoiled, that it must be the candidate.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      StevieGee9 months, 2 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      It is a good day for democracy.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        bbalden9 months, 2 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I voted for Nader. A vote for principles in which you believe can never be considered a vote wasted. And I disagree with the previous characterization of Nader as a liberal. For those many who may associate him with litigation or withheld support for fear of a notion of even more governmental intrusion in our lives, I'd encourage you to research the man. I believe that he's all about capitalism. But capitalism that's answerable to its customers. Representation that's answerable. Ralph has made a life's work of fighting for all of us. As long as we insist that a third party isn't viable, we'll continue to be subjects to the commercialized form of government that convinces us that we as citizens hold a lesser voice in the direction of our country than the corporations that sell us our clothes, our presidents and our wars.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        tadair9199 months, 2 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        reading these comments gives me hope for the future. not the fuzzy political catch-phrase kind of hope. rather, the sincere belief that we will overcome this obstacle.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        View All 28 Comments

        Add a Comment

        Sign In With Your Propeller Account

        Forgot your password?

        Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

        To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

        More News