Top 50 Reasons I Reject Evolution »

Posted By RickyDawkins 8 months ago in Humor

2.) Because I’m too stupid and/or lazy to open a f-ing book or turn on the Discovery Science Channel.

6.) Because I can’t get it through my thick logic-proof skull that evolution refers ONLY to the process of speciation, not to abiogenesis, or planet formation, or big bang cosmology, or whether God exists, or where they buried Jimmy Hoffa, or why the sky is blue, or how many licks it takes to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop.

11.) Because I think the word “theory” actually means: “random stabs in the dark” when it really means: "an explanation of certain phenomena that is well-supported by a large body of facts and often unifies other similarly well-supported hypotheses" i.e. atomic theory, gravitational theory, germ theory, cell theory, some-people-are-dumb-mfers-theory, etc.

25.) Because I don’t realize that saying “microevolution is possible but macroevolution isn’t” is like saying “I can pick my nose for one second but I cannot pick it for 10 seconds.”

32.) Because the planet and all the life on it was designed for humans… kinda like how the Metropolitan Museum of Art in NY was designed specifically for the dust-bunnies that may accumulate on the floors.

40.) Because I haven’t put my cave on the market and moved into the 21st century yet. I’m waiting for the cave market to rebound from the recent financial meltdown.

48.) Because I’m a freethinker and freethinking really means ignoring anything that contradicts what I already believe.

:)

Read Full Story at bobbie-the-jean.deviantart.com »

1312 Views Share Story 71 Comments Report

Submitted By:
RickyDawkins

Atheism can be either the rejection of theism, or the position that deities do not exist. In the broadest sense, it is the absence of ...

Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Showing 70 of 71 Comments (view all)
- Display
  • 94%
    RickyDawkins8 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    15.) Because some secretly fabulous closet-dwelling televangelist (who un-ironically preaches hate towards gays) told me that evolution is Satan’s way of leading me away from God.

    16.) Because that same guy (who was also caught snorting blow off a male hooker’s shiny naked ass) told me that God planted those fossils to test my faith.

    23.) Because the idea that life evolved naturally over billions of years is infinitely less believable than the idea that an 800 year old man crammed two of every species into a giant wooden boat when the entire planet flooded, an event for which there is absolutely no geological evidence whatsoever and also makes no f-ing sense at all.

    33.) Because I don’t realize that if we actually found croco-ducks in the fossil record, it would falsify evolution.

    34.) Because plenty of respectable people like Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, and Mike Huckabee (who are not scientists) don’t accept evolution, and that somehow validates my opinion.

    40.) Because I haven’t put my cave on the market and moved into the 21st century yet. I’m waiting for the cave market to rebound from the recent financial meltdown.

    46.) Because I think I’m too special to have been crafted by any natural process and the entire planet, solar system, galaxy, and universe were created with me especially in mind.

    47.) Because I unquestioningly swallow the ignorant anti-science bs spewed directly from the fraudulent stupid asses of people like Ken Ham, Ted Haggard, Fred Phelps, and Kent Hovind.

    http://bobbie-the-jean.deviantart.com/journal/2358...

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 94%
      CRYMTYPHON8 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I am kinder than Mr. Dawkins.

      I regard those who reject evolution, as exactly the sort of
      person I was, when the kid next door told me where babies
      came from.

      that's disgusting I said,
      and I rejected the theory completely;
      although aftewards I never could take my parents seriously.

      That babies came from a sticky, slimy embarrasing bio-chemical process driven by desire and ruled by random interaction, - offended me.

      Just so, those who oppose the concept that all present life is the result of the mating of desire and chance on the marriage bed of biochemical laws, - mean well.

      They just need to grow up some.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 93%
      Spadecaller8 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Ken Ham, Ted Haggard, Fred Phelps, and Kent Hovind can make more money "romancing the bone."

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Poulenc8 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        ...and may I add, in the words of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes (as part, actually, of a highly un-PC ruling), "three generations of idiots are enough."

        By which I mean that, really, we must attempt to set a statute of limitations for (willful) credulity.

        (I reserve, however, the right the believe that babies appear from beneath cabbage leaves. Call it a personal belief mini-system)

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        13 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        alakazam8 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        "Because I can’t get it through my thick logic-proof skull that evolution refers ONLY to the process of speciation, not to abiogenesis, or planet formation, or big bang cosmology, or whether God exists, or where they buried Jimmy Hoffa, or why the sky is blue, or how many licks it takes to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop."

        That's the biggie with me...My Border Collie didn't pop out of Border Collie eggs set down 5000 years ago. They developed.

        Common sense is really important...so is dealing with the actual argument.

        Evolution VS The God Argument is apples and oranges.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        3 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Sageparadox8 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I find 6,7, and 8 revelant in alot of discussions.

        6.) Because I can’t get it through my thick logic-proof skull that evolution refers ONLY to the process of speciation, not to abiogenesis, or planet formation, or big bang cosmology, or whether God exists, or where they buried Jimmy Hoffa, or why the sky is blue, or how many licks it takes to get to the center of a ******* Tootsie Pop.

        7.) Because the fossil record doesn’t comprise the remains of every single living thing that ever existed on this 4.5 billion year old planet, even though fossilization is a rare process that only occurs under very specific circumstances.

        8.) Because science has yet to produce any transitional species… except for the magnitudinous numbers of them found in the fossil record which don’t count because… I uh, OOH LOOK! A SHINY OBJECT!!! *runs away*

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          Sageparadox8 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          19.) Because I don’t understand why, if we share common ancestry with chimps, there are still chimps. And when someone with more than three brain cells in their head inevitably replies: “for the same reason Americans share common ancestry with Brits but there are still Brits, I can’t follow the logic. It’s just too big a leap. Who am I, Evil Knievel?

          23.) Because the idea that life evolved naturally over billions of years is infinitely less believable than the idea that an 800 year old man crammed two of every species into a giant wooden boat when the entire planet flooded, an event for which there is absolutely no geological evidence whatsoever and also makes no ******* sense at all.

          29.) Because I didn’t know that evolution has been tested and observed in laboratories

          39.) Because evolution means that I absolutely MUST reject everything else I know, abandon all my beliefs, and start aping around my house like a ******* monkey. OOOh-ooohh-ooohohh -OOOOOOHHHHHH!!!!!

          43.) Because I don’t know that evolution is routinely used in medicine to diagnose and treat certain illnesses such as genetic ailments, bacterial infections, and viral infections.

          44.) Because I believe there is a strong comparison between designed inanimate objects such as buildings, paintings, and watches (which we know were pieced together from identifiable components by human beings) and living organisms (which reproduce with genetic variation under the effects of environmental attrition).

          50.) Because despite the fact that in all my years of life, I have never seen any magic, I still believe magic is the answer to anything I don’t immediately comprehend.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 100%
            Sageparadox8 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Kind my top 10 of the top 50 8D

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • 0%
              wealthmagnet8 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              We have come so far from caveman, to the 21st century, i don't believe my ancestors were monkeys

              http://www.passtowealthmachine.com

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply

              2 Replies

              loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              Hallucinations8 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              This is getting to d*mn complicated for me.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply

              1 Reply

              loading loading ...
            • 0%
              charles12345678908 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              It's interesting the the Theory of Evolution has to be defended with anger, vitreol and words of hatred. If it were an easy fact that we could all understand, there would be a simple explanation for it that we all could understand and accept. The Theory of Gravitational Effect (gravity), the law that like species produce only like species are easy to understand and are never argued by the masses. I think that evolutionists need to explain their theory in such a manner that it's obvious to the rest of us, not just the select few.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply

              7 Replies

              loading loading ...
            • 0%
              charles12345678908 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              It's interesting the the Theory of Evolution has to be defended with anger, vitreol and words of hatred.
              If it were an obvious fact that we could all accept, there would be a simple explanation for it. The Theory of Gravitational Effect (gravity), the law that like species produce only like species and the fact that intelligent design is required to create cars, houses and anything else of value are easy to understand and are never argued by the masses. I think that evolutionists need to explain their theory in such a manner that it's obvious to the rest of us, not just the select few who are the "enlightened ones". It is not obvious to the rest of us how random chance can evolve Cindy Crawford into a beautiful super model in a mere 19 years, yet given 14 billion years cannot do something so simple as create a football, a fence post, nor transform a single simple element (lead) into gold so we can all be rich!

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply

              17 Replies

              loading loading ...
            View All 71 Comments

            Add a Comment

            Sign In With Your Propeller Account

            Forgot your password?

            Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

            To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.