« Back to story "Obama VA: Let’s charge vets for care on service-related injuries"

Story Comments

Posted by: pc25 9 months, 3 weeks ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

53%
pc259 months, 3 weeks ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/10/veterans.he...

Senators slam plan for wounded vets to use private insurance

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki confirmed Tuesday that the Obama administration is considering a controversial plan to make veterans pay for treatment of service-related injuries with private insurance.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
5 Replies

loading ...
- 63%
  hyperbola9 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Oh my, the racist zionists at hotair trying to invent anti-Obama "controversies" again! What else should we expect from Michelle Malkin and Ed Morissey!
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...
- 89%
  willottica9 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  ...hmmm I wonder if what's under consideration is providing private insurance to veterans so that they can seek treatment wherever they want.
  
  The "it" in "it's under consideration" - the entirety of the source of the article, it seems, is undefined. Why not reveal the question as well? That which "it" refers to would be there. I suppose it might be much less offensive to us all if they did.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...
- 75%
  Goppy9 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  I just don't understand the Right Wing and the Fundamental Moral Vacancy © .
  
  • • • • • •
  
  ..
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...
- 100%
  quackpot9 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  This article seems to be a bit out of context, PC25. Care to provide a link that reflects ALL of the considerations of this supposed plan? Was there to be any consideration for providing private coverage so that the vets could go where ever they pleased?
  
  Thanks
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...
- 100%
  Natureboy9 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Confusing.
  
  Is the administration trying to make vets pay for treatment of their injuries, or is the administration looking to make commercial insurance pay primary, as it does with many Medicare (MSP) beneficiaries?
  
  These are two separate issues. If the agenda is to make vets pay out of pocket, its shameful. If it is merely a question of coordination of benefits, Hotair bimbos should stop living up to their names and speak plainly.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...

Post Reply

You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

People Who Liked This Comment (8)

People Who Didn't Like This Comment (7)

Submit a Story

Advertisement