« Back to story "Washington Times - Obama tries to block AIG's bonuses"

Story Comments

Posted by: fishifanb 9 months, 3 weeks ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

57%
fishifanb9 months, 3 weeks ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Contracts are not enforcable when they are against the public interest. Legalistic arguments like the one you make seek to avoid the fact that these payments are ethically wrong and the contracts requiring them could, very likely, be declared null and void by a court.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
1 Reply

loading ...
- 67%
  crghss9 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  "Contracts are not enforcable when they are against the public interest."
  
  Sorry but not the case. But if they would made stipulation to the company BEFORE they gave them money maybe we could voided the contracts. But once they got the money and dispensed it. To late.
  
  Chaos, pure chaos.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...