Yahoo News - The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes for Treatment »

Posted By pc25 8 months, 2 weeks ago in News

ASHINGTON, March 16 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The leader of the nation's largest veterans organization says he is "deeply disappointed and concerned" after a meeting with President Obama today to discuss a proposal to force private insurance companies to pay for the treatment of military veterans who have suffered service-connected disabilities and injuries. The Obama administration recently revealed a plan to require private insurance carriers to reimburse the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in such cases.

Read Full Story at news.yahoo.com »

410 Views Share Story 34 Comments Report

Submitted By:
pc25

studio engineer, studio musician, producer

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 34 (view all)
- Display
  • 62%
    froggy578 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    your unrelenting castigation of Obama is a little ridiculous.
    It reveals the shapened edge of the axe you are grinding.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 45%
    buckncindykill8 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Another question is: Where is comrade goppy? With his constant railing about the morally vacant republicans trashing veterans care, you would think he would be speaking out about Obama doing the same thing.

    Oh wait, he's a liberal. Things like morally vacant only apply to republicans. They never apply to socialists like Obama.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • 70%
    JamesMarcus8 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    If Obama is intent on screwing veterans, then he deserves a paddling. However, we won't hear the other side of the story in this article, because it's not written by a reporter--it's a press release from the American Legion. Just look for the telltale PR Newswire logo, folks.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    6 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 38%
    Charlson8 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    It is disingenuous of the Legion to claim that the government is not meeting their "moral and government-avowed obligations."

    The gov't is taking on the insurance companies for the sake of the vet.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 50%
    Wolfie20078 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    FTA
    "The Commander, clearly angered as he emerged from the session said, "This reimbursement plan would be inconsistent with the mandate ' to care for him who shall have borne the battle' given that the United States government sent members of the armed forces into harm's way, and not private insurance companies. I say again that The American Legion does not and will not support any plan that seeks to bill a veteran for treatment of a service connected disability at the very agency that was created to treat the unique need of America's veterans!"

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 50%
      Wolfie20078 months, 2 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      "This reimbursement plan would be inconsistent with the mandate ' to care for him who shall have borne the battle' given that the United States government sent members of the armed forces into harm's way, and not private insurance companies."

      Why does Obama want to abandon his and our governments duty to these veterans? This is sick!

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 67%
        GehlLady8 months, 2 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Plain and simple, it does not matter left or right bias. It is ridiculous to expect private insurance companies to pay for injuries sustained by our troops, in or out of a war zone.
        What's next? Taking the Tricare from the spouses of our retired/deceased military men and women? The spouses of our servicemen and women are "in the service" of our country just as the service member themselves are.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 67%
          DaneL8 months, 2 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Would you expect anything less from the party that hates the military? I'm not surprised.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 100%
            coolslow8 months, 2 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Its fairly safe to assume that when a behavior or product is taxed, there will be a reduction in that behavior or product. The higher the tax, the less of the product.

            Another part of the Obama plan is to tax the employee for company paid health care premiums. Now why would anyone want to do that, and reduce the VA health care for the Vets, reducing helath care coverage for more Americans? Answer is to to create more of a demand and a need for a single government run health care systemby whittling down the current system. Look for more of the same to make private health care and company paid health more difficult to obtain, keep or support.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply

            1 Reply

            loading loading ...
          • 100%
            icono18 months, 2 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            This whole episode sounds like one Con artist, 0Bama and co, trying to Con another group of Cons, the insurance companies, by using the honorable vets and their health care as bait in a very incredible bait and switch scheme.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              k9kssr8 months, 2 weeks ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              You know, some service related illnesses/injuries aren't immediately apparent. Take Agent Orange and PTSD. If a veteran does have private coverage and some condition turned up later, could this be considered service related and therefore pre-existing and not covered? I, personally, don't feel the insurance company would be, or even should be, responsible in such cases. Seems to me this so-called "plan" of Obama's would cause insurance companies to be hesitant to insure a veteran.

              Also, if a veteran is not insured privately, would he be responsible for a deductible and co-payment just like regular insurance? It should be fair and equitable and not discriminate against the insured. It just seems to me that those that are insured are being taken advantage of.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              View All 34 Comments

              Add a Comment

              Sign In With Your Propeller Account

              Forgot your password?

              Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

              To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

              More News