« Back to story "Sources: U.S. to sign U.N. gay rights decree"

Comments for Sources: U.S. to sign U.N. gay rights decree »

Posted By david_nwpa 9 months, 1 week ago in News

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration will endorse a U.N. declaration calling for the worldwide decriminalization of homosexuality that then-President George W. Bush had refused to sign, The Associated Press has learned.

Read Full Story at msnbc.msn.com »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 29
- Display
  • 70%
    david_nwpa9 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Every member of the European Union along with Mexico, Canada, Japan, and Australia have signed this French resolution at the United Nations. The United States was the lone western power which had not signed on to the resolution when it was first presented during the Bush administration. President Obama has taken a crucial step toward recognizing that gays and lesbians are human too.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
    Reply

    21 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 70%
      StevieGee9 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      This is another example of how Obama is inclusive of others. Where Bush took the typical neo-con position of discriminating against anyone who isn't just like him, Obama reviews this and decides to sign it. He really didn't have to politically because I don't think that many people were paying attention to it.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
      Reply

      20 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 44%
        b-happy9 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        not that I agree with it but if you want equal rights for all people then why not decriminalize marrying your sister? Makes as much sense as being gay,

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply

        19 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • 50%
          Dionys9 months, 1 week ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Always nice to see there are still some devoted hateful bigots out there.

          There have always been laws, morals or ethical guidelines in place in societies regarding incest.

          This is not true for homosexuality.

          Even the Bible doesn't condemn homosexuality, but instead condemns a single homosexual act between two men.

          Go sell your hatred elsewhere. No one's buying it.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 83%
            cleare9 months, 1 week ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            in this country, the reason it is illegal to marry your sister is because of the possibility of genetic abnormality of any offspring of the union.

            there are no such concerns for gays or lesbians.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
            Reply

            16 Replies

            loading loading ...
            • 100%
              Tangent0019 months, 1 week ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Incest is also an inherently psychologically unhealthy relationship.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
            • 50%
              StevieGee9 months, 1 week ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              I've got no problem with that. I don't have a sister though. Of course, in order for it to be equal rights for all, it would have to be ok for my sister to marry my sister.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
        • 100%
          Tangent0019 months, 1 week ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Keep in mind, being a signatory to this resolution doesn't automatically bind the US to allowing same-sex marriage. It just says people can't be criminalized based on their sexual preference.

          Good move, Obama.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 0%
            shiane639 months, 1 week ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            It is disgusting for a man to sleep with a man and a woman to sleep with a woman. period.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • 0%
              shiane639 months, 1 week ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              It is disgusting for a man to have sex with another man or a woman to have sex with another woman. period..
              You people aren't loving each other, you're just being disgusting.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
              Reply

              4 Replies

              loading loading ...
              • 100%
                david_nwpa9 months, 1 week ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                Yet, when a man and woman sleep together it disgusts some gays and lesbians. Outright accusing gays of not loving one another is absurd. Do you know and understand what is in their hearts and minds? Sounds to me like you are simply being judgmental and not particularly tolerant. Gays and lesbians have been around for thousands of years, get used to the idea that they will be around for thousands more.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                Reply

                3 Replies

                loading loading ...
                • 0%
                  shiane639 months, 1 week ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  Why in the world would I get used to something that is not morally right? Are you not above the animals? I will never accept any reasoning for this very unnatural and appalling thing. I've listened to gays talk and it's all about perversion. No tolerance is acceptable.EVER!!!!!!!

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                  Reply

                  2 Replies

                  loading loading ...
                  • 100%
                    RickyDawkins9 months, 1 week ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    Males do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual. The world is not to be divided into sheep and goats. It is a fundamental of taxonomy that nature rarely deals with discrete categories... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.

                    While emphasizing the continuity of the gradations between exclusively heterosexual and exclusively homosexual histories, it has seemed desirable to develop some sort of classification which could be based on the relative amounts of heterosexual and homosexual experience or response in each history... An individual may be assigned a position on this scale, for each period in his life.... A seven-point scale comes nearer to showing the many gradations that actually exist.

                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinsey_scale

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                    Reply
                    loading loading ...
                    • Neutral
                      Glimsong9 months, 1 week ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      quote: shiane63 This statement: "Why in the world would I get used to something that is not morally right? Are you not above the animals?" and this one: "I will never accept any reasoning for this very unnatural and appalling thing" are mutual exclusive. You cannot say something should be above animals and then declare it unnatural when it isn't. Also for the same line: "I will never accept any reasoning for this very unnatural and appalling thing." I will point out very simply that it is natural. In point of fact at least one species of animal mates with a same sex partner for life. Quote: "I've listened to gays talk and it's all about perversion." Simply put gay folk talk about the same things as non-gay folk so I find that statement absolutely ridiculous. Quote: "No tolerance is acceptable.EVER!!!!!!!" This quote well it pretty much speaks for itself doesn't it? It defines you as something I typical refrain from calling people. In fact statements such as this show a total lack of moral character. So the hypocrisy of calling something immoral when you define yourself as immoral by your own words is rather enlightening.

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                      Reply
                      loading loading ...

                Add a Comment

                Sign In With Your Propeller Account

                Forgot your password?

                Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

                To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.