« Back to story "Sources: U.S. to sign U.N. gay rights decree"

Story Comments

Posted by: shiane63 9 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 0%
    shiane639 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Why in the world would I get used to something that is not morally right? Are you not above the animals? I will never accept any reasoning for this very unnatural and appalling thing. I've listened to gays talk and it's all about perversion. No tolerance is acceptable.EVER!!!!!!!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      RickyDawkins9 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Males do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual. The world is not to be divided into sheep and goats. It is a fundamental of taxonomy that nature rarely deals with discrete categories... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.

      While emphasizing the continuity of the gradations between exclusively heterosexual and exclusively homosexual histories, it has seemed desirable to develop some sort of classification which could be based on the relative amounts of heterosexual and homosexual experience or response in each history... An individual may be assigned a position on this scale, for each period in his life.... A seven-point scale comes nearer to showing the many gradations that actually exist.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinsey_scale

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        Glimsong8 months, 4 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        quote: shiane63 This statement: "Why in the world would I get used to something that is not morally right? Are you not above the animals?" and this one: "I will never accept any reasoning for this very unnatural and appalling thing" are mutual exclusive. You cannot say something should be above animals and then declare it unnatural when it isn't. Also for the same line: "I will never accept any reasoning for this very unnatural and appalling thing." I will point out very simply that it is natural. In point of fact at least one species of animal mates with a same sex partner for life. Quote: "I've listened to gays talk and it's all about perversion." Simply put gay folk talk about the same things as non-gay folk so I find that statement absolutely ridiculous. Quote: "No tolerance is acceptable.EVER!!!!!!!" This quote well it pretty much speaks for itself doesn't it? It defines you as something I typical refrain from calling people. In fact statements such as this show a total lack of moral character. So the hypocrisy of calling something immoral when you define yourself as immoral by your own words is rather enlightening.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...

      Post Reply

      You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

      People Who Liked This Comment (0)

      No one voted this comment positively. Is it really that bad of a comment?

      People Who Didn't Like This Comment (2)