Story Comments
Posted by: hyperbola 8 months, 4 weeks ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
100%
hyperbola8 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
.... Modern Jews do not have to feel guilty for the misdeeds of Jews long gone. No son is responsible for the sins of his father. Israel could have turned this mass grave with its Byzantine chapel and mosaics into a small and poignant memorial reminding its citizens of a horrible page in the history of the land and of the dangers of genocidal supremacy. Instead, the Israeli authorities preferred to demolish the tomb and create an underground parking-lot in its place. That did not cause a murmur.
Reply
The guardians of the Jewish conscience, Amos Oz and others, have objected to the destruction of ancient remains. No, not of the tomb at Mamilla. They ran a petition against the keepers of the Haram a-Sharif mosque complex for digging a ten-inch trench to lay a new pipe. It did not matter to them that in an op-ed in Haaretz, the leading Israeli archaeologist denied any relevance of the mosque-works to science. They still described it as ‘a barbaric act of Muslims aimed at the obliteration of the Jewish heritage of Jerusalem’....
Censored history creates a distorted picture of reality. Recognition of the past is a necessary step on the way to sanity. The Germans and the Japanese have recognized the crimes of their fathers, have came to grips with their moral failings and have emerged as humbler, less boastful folks, akin to the rest of human race. We Jews have so far failed to exorcise the haughty spirit of the Chosen-ness, and find ourselves in a dire predicament. That is why the idea of supremacy is still with us, still calling for genocide....
The Haaretz published an ad on its front page[vi], a fatwa, signed by a group of Rabbis. The Rabbis proclaimed the theological identification of Ishmael (the Arabs) with the Amalek. ‘Amalek’ is mentioned in the Bible as the name of a tribe that caused trouble for the Children of Israel. In this story the God of Israel commands His people to exterminate the Amalek tribe completely, including its livestock.... In plain English, the Rabbis’ fatwa means: our religious duty is to kill all Arabs, including women and babies and their livestock to the last cat. The liberal Haaretz, whose editor and owner are sufficiently versed to understand the fatwa, did not hesitate to place the ad. ..
It would be unfair to single out Haaretz. Another prominent Jewish newspaper, The Washington Post, published an equally passionate call to genocide by Charles Krauthammer[viii]. ..... Krauthammer wants to repeat this feat in Palestine. ‘It’ is already cut off, divided by the Israeli army into seventy pieces. Now it is ready for the great kill. ‘Kill it!’ he calls with great passion. He must be worried that the Persians will again stop the bloodbath before the Mamilla Pool fills up. His worries are our hopes.
http://www.israelshamir.net/English/mamilla.htm-
0%
Edmar148 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Does anybody notice that this person just rants and raves, makes up her own history and promotes so much hate that you can't help but to hate her back. Don't take anything that she says with too much interest however, Hyperbola has been known on more than one occasion to twist history to her liking- such as "the Partition plan was never passed by the UN". Although the UN vote for partition is public record and historically well documented, this is just more of Hyperbola's History 101. Much of it ranks (and I mean rank) up with "the holocaust never happened" and Zionists killed 7 million Muslims and Christians. The latter is the entire population of Lebanon, Jordan and the West Bank and Gaza, so according to Hyperbola, there are no Palestinians, Lebanese or Jordanians left. You can't but help but laugh at this gal's chutzpa. However, if you want a real laugh, read her bio. Not only does she write her own history, she walks on water as well.
Reply-
100%
hyperbola8 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You are lying to us again Edmar. The UN Security Council rejected the partition plan and sent it back to the General Assembly,thereby vitiating it. At the time the zionists started their massive campaign of terrorism and ethnic cleansing in 1948, the UN (with US approval) was working on establishing a single country in all of Palestine with equal rights for all independent of race or religion. The lies you have to tell to try to excuse continuous zionist crimes against humanity speak for themselves.
Reply
Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews
.... According to first and still existing draft of history, Israel was given its birth certificate and thus legitimacy by the UN Partition Resolution of 29 November 1947. This is nonsense.
In the first place the UN without the consent of the majority of the people of Palestine did not have the right to decide to partition Palestine or assign any part of its territory to a minority of alien immigrants in order for them to establish a state of their own.
Despite that, by the narrowest of margins, and only after a rigged vote, the UN General Assembly did pass a resolution to partition Palestine and create two states, one Arab, one Jewish, with Jerusalem not part of either. But the General Assembly resolution was only a proposal – meaning that it could have no effect, would not become policy, unless approved by the Security Council.
The truth is that the General Assembly’s partition proposal never went to the Security Council for consideration. Why not? Because the US knew that, if approved, it could only be implemented by force; and President Truman was not prepared to use force to partition Palestine.
So the partition plan was vitiated, became invalid, and the question of what the hell to do about Palestine (after Britain had made a mess of it and walked away) was taken back to the General Assembly for more discussion. The option favoured and proposed by the US was temporary UN Trusteeship. It was while the General Assembly was debating what do that Israel unilaterally declared itself to be in existence – actually in defiance of the will of the organised international community, including the Truman administration.
The truth of the time was that the Zionist state, which came into being mainly as a consequence of Zionism terrorism and ethnic cleansing, had no right to exist and, more to the point, could have no right to exist unless ….. Unless it was recognised and legitimized by those who were dispossessed of their land and their rights during the creation of the Zionist state. In international law only the Palestinians could give Israel the legitimacy it craved. And that legitimacy was the only thing the Zionists could not take from the Palestinians by force. ...
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18... -
100%
hyperbola8 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Poor Edmar, still trying to kill messengers to cover up massive zionist crimes against humanity. Enough of your lies already.
Reply
Forced Migration Review Journal
Department of International Development
University of Oxford
Palestinian displacement: a case apart?
This issue of FMR was planned long before the humanitarian crisis which has displaced 20% of the Lebanese population. Articles look beyond the current events to what most international observers regard as the root causes of conflict and displacement in the Middle East. The protracted nature of the displacement, the complexity of the means used to dispossess Palestinians and the apparent double standards of the international community do indeed make this a case apart.
From high points in the West Bank it is possible to see across Israel/Palestine – from the Dead Sea to the Mediterranean. The articles in this issue discuss how displacement from this tiny sliver of land has had and continues to have far-reaching global consequences.
The great majority of the seven million Palestinian refugees still live within 100km of the borders of Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip where their homes of origin are located. They are refugees because Israel – committed to a permanent Jewish majority and granting citizenship to any member of the Jewish diaspora – denies Palestinians their basic human right to return to their homes of origin. Palestinians are the world’s largest refugee population, yet...
http://www.fmreview.org/FMRpdfs/FMR26/FMR26full.pd...
-
-
loading ...
People Who Liked This Comment (1)
dextrasePeople Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment negatively.
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.