« Back to story "Obama Begins Turnover of USA Sovereignty to International Body"

Story Comments

Posted by: SFCGuyW 9 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 75%
    SFCGuyW9 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Far to many Americans fail to understand subjects such as you, RedRiverJ, have commented on & you are one of them. For the last 30 years the USA has been reducing it's nuclear arsenal under agreements made with the USSR and other members of the nuclear club. We are dismantling old nukes as they become unstable and/or technologically out of date. Before then the USA had enough nukes to kill every human and destroy every nation on the planet over nine times. We now can only do this about seven times over. The reduction Obama proposes would lower that to 6 times over & rightfully so sense the nations capable of using nukes to destroy the USA has grown slimmer because of destroying nukes they own and our capability of intercepting missiles. One USA nuke sub has the firepower to kill every person in Iran, N. Korea and most other potential enemy nations. Iran knows this and so does NK - thus, they postulate only, knowing that if they ever did use a nuke they would be destroying themselves. . . . . Even our non-nuke weapons are horrifically destructive in power and accuracy today. One modern bomber carries more lethal accuracy than a flight of bomber in WWII. Instead of having to destroy a city to ensure the weapons factory is destroyed we can now pin point the weapons factory with little damage to civilian homes. . . . Obama is not making us any weaker by these concessions.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      CRYMTYPHON9 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      That was thick, - but factual and worth reading twice.
      Thanks SFCGuyW

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (3)

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (1)