« Back to story "Reuters:World: Russia and China float World Currency at G20"

Story Comments

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

100%
truthiness9 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

and here is an article from 2004 which discusses the build up towards a world currency at that time.
http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/Banking/P91828...

my concern is that whoever provides currency is the government. Which is the reason the 10th amendment failed in the USA. Is a world govt necessarily bad? No, but if we are going to surrender our sovereignty to the UN we better engage in some forethought.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
2 Replies

loading ...
- doggammitComment removed: Retracted by user
- Neutral
  cowboygrandpa9 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  truthiness:
  
  "Is a world govt necessarily bad?"
  
  Yes it is, when you have the evil we have as the leaders in the world right now.
  
  Free speech would be abolished, and one world order would be required. Trade would not be free in that with a one world economy. There would be no competition, everything woulld be government owned and ran. Even if they claimed it would not be, it would have to be.
  
  Think of all the world laying claim to Americas food, or laying claim to Mexicos oil, or Russias oil ...
  
  We give up our rights as a nation when we give up our monetary system.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...