« Back to story "2008 Tax Records Reveal Sasha Obama Made $136 In Allowance Money"

Story Comments

Posted by: Hhussk 8 months, 4 weeks ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

20%
Hhussk8 months, 4 weeks ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Interweaving fiction (and humor) with real news poisons the integrity and credibility needed to discuss actual content.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
4 Replies

loading ...
- 100%
  wtagg8 months, 4 weeks ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  I think that the fact it was placed in the humor section labels it enough for evaluation.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  1 Reply
  
  loading ...
  - 100%
    CRYMTYPHON8 months, 4 weeks ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    I think over-propping the PC25 factory-ouput,
    will diminish anyone's sense of what is real.
    
    Probably they should not be allowed to operate heavy machinery either.
    
    I'm just saying.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    0 Replies
    
    loading ...
- 100%
  Progressive8 months, 4 weeks ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  If one has no sense of humor, no discussion of actual content is necessary.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...
- 100%
  Beau78908 months, 4 weeks ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Hhussk:
  
  That would be true for a "news outlet" (think Fox) or a radio commentator who calls himself an entertainer while upbraiding politicians for not subscribing to his own contorted views. (I'll let you figure out who I might be talking about there.)
  
  The lines are blurred when a news source does not label part of its content as fiction or humor. But as wtagg pointed out above, this story was submitted in the Humor channel.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...