New Way To Split Water Into Hydrogen And Oxygen Developed »

Posted By myfairlady 7 months ago in Science & Technology

The design of efficient systems for splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen, driven by sunlight is among the most important challenges facing science today, underpinning the long term potential of hydrogen as a clean, sustainable fuel. But man-made systems that exist today are very inefficient and often require additional use of sacrificial chemical agents. In this context, it is important to establish new mechanisms by which water splitting can take place.

Read Full Story at sciencedaily.com »

664 Views Share Story 15 Comments Report

Submitted By:
myfairlady

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 15 (view all)
- Display
  • 100%
    beavith17 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    interesting science.

    the problem here is that the complex is built around ruthenium. its part of the platinum group elements that you've never heard before: rhodium, osmium, rhenium, iridium and palladium.

    they are rare and expensive here on earth.

    hmmmm. actually, those elements are much more common on iron-nickel meteoroid/asteroids. just one more reason to explore the solar system...

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    4 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    frctm57 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Given its abundance in water, hydrogen offers great promise as an alternative fuel. However, as a vehicle propellant, it still has many problems. Storage is the biggest issue with hydrogen. Liquefying it or compressing it requires energy. Three basic methods are used to store hydrogen. One is an insulated tank that keeps the gas cold enough to remain in a liquid state, another is just an old fashion high pressure welding style tank. The third method is hydrogen absorbing metals but their capacity is very limited. The insulated tank will not keep the hydrogen in your car indefinitely. If you let it sit to long, the gas will eventually evaporate. Welding tanks are very heavy and can't be charged safely at a service station. More likely it would just be swapped out for a new tank. Hydrogen is also extremely dangerous. It will ignite in a much broader ratio of fuel to air mixtures than gasoline. Anything from 5% to 75% is ignitable. Every car would be a potential bomb in a traffic accident.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    tadair9197 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    ruthenium rock, eh?

    you know, i've seen something like this before.

    follow this link:

    http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/watercar/h20ca...

    and watch the video at the bottom.

    comments?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    chevydog7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Interesting article. Ruthenium is of course pretty scarce. And making an organo-metallic compound of it would repesent some pretty sophisticated chemistry.

    Hopefully, this is a real advance and not just another cold fusion episode.

    For the cynically minded, I offer a "law" propounded by a chemist friend-- In any field of experimental endeavor, the most promising results are obtained immediately and are not reproducible.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    beavith17 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    by my calculation a 2mm diameter 50 mm long wire weighs about .24 g

    for 624 pounds sterling?

    pretty CHEAP?????

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    View All 15 Comments

    Add a Comment

    Sign In With Your Propeller Account

    Forgot your password?

    Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

    To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

    More News