« Back to story "New Way To Split Water Into Hydrogen And Oxygen Developed"

Comments for New Way To Split Water Into Hydrogen And Oxygen Developed »

Posted By myfairlady 8 months, 3 weeks ago in Science & Technology

The design of efficient systems for splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen, driven by sunlight is among the most important challenges facing science today, underpinning the long term potential of hydrogen as a clean, sustainable fuel. But man-made systems that exist today are very inefficient and often require additional use of sacrificial chemical agents. In this context, it is important to establish new mechanisms by which water splitting can take place.

Read Full Story at sciencedaily.com »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 15
- Display
  • 100%
    beavith18 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    interesting science.

    the problem here is that the complex is built around ruthenium. its part of the platinum group elements that you've never heard before: rhodium, osmium, rhenium, iridium and palladium.

    they are rare and expensive here on earth.

    hmmmm. actually, those elements are much more common on iron-nickel meteoroid/asteroids. just one more reason to explore the solar system...

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
    Reply

    4 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      BB648 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      You stole my thoughts. If they can figure out the actual cause or reason for the reaction, perhaps we can find a synthetic option. Again this won't be a viable solution for many years. Research like this is neither fast nor cheap.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        beavith18 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        i think the mechanism is important, but the chemistry of the Platinum Group Metals (PGMs) is pretty peculiar.

        photosynthesis has a Mg center. hemoglobin, as all us red blooded americans know ;-) , is based on Fe. N fixation by bacteria is based on Mo.

        if we can reproduce the Ru work in something like Ni, it'd have a whole lot more utility.

        On the other hand, if it only works with Ru, lets start mining asteroids!

        the next obvious question to study is how well this works in steam. it seems to take quite a bit of energy to recover the H2.

        (sigh) i guess there still is no such thing as a free lunch.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        hyperbola8 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Actually ruthenium is part of the palladium series, not the platinum series. Its abundance is similar to that of molybdenum, platinum, gold, ... in fact, it is one of the common "impurities" in gold and platinum mining activities and could probably be obtained about as efficiently as those metals if there were sufficient demand.

        One should, of course, also remember that there are hundreds of research groups pursuing similar goals worldwide and this one is not particularly different from many others. Perhaps the final result will be a biological system, or a pseudo-biological system?

        Genetically Engineered Blood Protein Can Be Used To Split Water Into Oxygen And Hydrogen
        http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/06120...

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          beavith18 months, 3 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          PGMs are a mining term. it includes all those elements in that region of the periodic table because they have similar mining properties. they don't have truly minable ores (except Pt, and even that is not very concentrated) and are concentrated from other worked ores. for instance Re is mainly collected from Ni mining.

          if there were cheap sources of any of them, they would be more widely used, just because of their myriad uses. Pt and Pd demand are close to world production. other PGMs? economically important curiosities..

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
      • 100%
        frctm58 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Given its abundance in water, hydrogen offers great promise as an alternative fuel. However, as a vehicle propellant, it still has many problems. Storage is the biggest issue with hydrogen. Liquefying it or compressing it requires energy. Three basic methods are used to store hydrogen. One is an insulated tank that keeps the gas cold enough to remain in a liquid state, another is just an old fashion high pressure welding style tank. The third method is hydrogen absorbing metals but their capacity is very limited. The insulated tank will not keep the hydrogen in your car indefinitely. If you let it sit to long, the gas will eventually evaporate. Welding tanks are very heavy and can't be charged safely at a service station. More likely it would just be swapped out for a new tank. Hydrogen is also extremely dangerous. It will ignite in a much broader ratio of fuel to air mixtures than gasoline. Anything from 5% to 75% is ignitable. Every car would be a potential bomb in a traffic accident.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply

        2 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          beavith18 months, 3 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          with gasoline, every car is already a bomb.

          your point about the trickiness of H2 is well taken. even if it is only used as a chemical feedstock, or bulk fuel (like rocket fuel), this could make the use of H2 more economical.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply

          1 Reply

          loading loading ...
          • 100%
            frctm58 months, 3 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            hydrogen is more volatile and more inclined explode than gasoline. Gasoline only burns at a one to sixteen air to fuel ratio and is in a liquid state at room temperature. Hydrogen, as I pointed out already, can burn or explode in a far greater range of fuel to air ratios and will be in a gaseous state the moment it comes out of its enclosure therefore making it much more likely to explode like a bomb. Hollywood creates the impression that cars are rolling bombs, but in reality cars rarely explode. It takes an extraordinary combination of circumstances to make this happen. The tank would have to be nearly empty and something like a spark would have to ignite the fumes while they were in an enclose space. The mixture couldn't be too rich or too lean. Plenty of cars catch fire but almost none actually explode.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          tadair9198 months, 3 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          ruthenium rock, eh?

          you know, i've seen something like this before.

          follow this link:

          http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/watercar/h20ca...

          and watch the video at the bottom.

          comments?

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply

          1 Reply

          loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          chevydog8 months, 3 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Interesting article. Ruthenium is of course pretty scarce. And making an organo-metallic compound of it would repesent some pretty sophisticated chemistry.

          Hopefully, this is a real advance and not just another cold fusion episode.

          For the cynically minded, I offer a "law" propounded by a chemist friend-- In any field of experimental endeavor, the most promising results are obtained immediately and are not reproducible.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply

          2 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • 100%
            tadair9198 months, 3 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            you could buy ruthenium for pretty cheap.

            http://www.shopmetals.co.uk/ruthenium_rod.html

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
            Reply

            1 Reply

            loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              chevydog8 months, 3 weeks ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Being dense, I couldn't translate that to something I understand--e.g. $/oz. I do speak metric, though not fluently.

              Also, what do the typical compositions mean? Thought they were %, but that doesn't make sense; ppm?. ppb? Those are little bitty wires!

              There's alot we don't know about this that hopefully will be cleared up as time goes on.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            beavith18 months, 3 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            by my calculation a 2mm diameter 50 mm long wire weighs about .24 g

            for 624 pounds sterling?

            pretty CHEAP?????

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
            Reply
            loading loading ...

            Add a Comment

            Sign In With Your Propeller Account

            Forgot your password?

            Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

            To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.