« Back to story "New Way To Split Water Into Hydrogen And Oxygen Developed"

Story Comments

Posted by: hyperbola 9 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • Neutral
    hyperbola9 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Actually ruthenium is part of the palladium series, not the platinum series. Its abundance is similar to that of molybdenum, platinum, gold, ... in fact, it is one of the common "impurities" in gold and platinum mining activities and could probably be obtained about as efficiently as those metals if there were sufficient demand.

    One should, of course, also remember that there are hundreds of research groups pursuing similar goals worldwide and this one is not particularly different from many others. Perhaps the final result will be a biological system, or a pseudo-biological system?

    Genetically Engineered Blood Protein Can Be Used To Split Water Into Oxygen And Hydrogen
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/06120...

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      beavith19 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      PGMs are a mining term. it includes all those elements in that region of the periodic table because they have similar mining properties. they don't have truly minable ores (except Pt, and even that is not very concentrated) and are concentrated from other worked ores. for instance Re is mainly collected from Ni mining.

      if there were cheap sources of any of them, they would be more widely used, just because of their myriad uses. Pt and Pd demand are close to world production. other PGMs? economically important curiosities..

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (0)

    No one voted this comment positively. Is it really that bad of a comment?

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

    No one voted this comment negatively.