« Back to story "America's Imperial Wars: We Need to See the Sickening Reality"

Story Comments

Posted by: jovial 8 months, 3 weeks ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

82%
jovial8 months, 3 weeks ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

I've seen the slaughter of various animals for meat. It's kind of grotesque, but it's done quickly. How would you feel if you knew that steak you are eating was the result of white phosphorus? Or cluster bombs? Or depleted uranium bullets? Would that steak be so tasty if you knew that animal languished in agony for days with third degree burns before it was slaughtered and sent to your frozen meat section? Yes some of those people aren't be killed for singing to loud, they're being killed as "collateral damage" , because they have no where to run and frankly no one really cares, because they don't see it.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
5 Replies

loading ...
- Locky12Comment removed: Spammer, Abusive4 Replies
  - 80%
    jovial8 months, 3 weeks ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    If you aint eating it, then don't make stupid analogies. I guess I should expect that from someone with your intelligence level!
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    3 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - Locky12Comment removed: Spammer, Abusive2 Replies
      - 78%
        jovial8 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        IT's a stupid analogy and talking about eating food and making a comparison to killing innocent people is crass. What kind of animal are you?
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        loading ...
        
        71%
        pokydoke8 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        A very stupid one.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...