Story Comments
Posted by: RedRiverJ 8 months, 3 weeks ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
69%
RedRiverJ8 months, 3 weeks ago
-
-
75%
RedRiverJ8 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
Reply
Voltaire (1694-1778) French writer and historian.
If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.
George Washington (1732-1799) First President of the USA.
Thats what the politicians seem to think of us, all of us.......SHEEP. -
100%
jovial8 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Add Mike McConnell to your list of Democrats because he was one of the ones to suggest this.
Reply
"10) According to the National Journal, Mike McConnell, the former Director of National Intelligence, told President Bush in May 2007 that if the 9/11 attackers had chosen computers instead of airplanes as their weapons and had waged a massive assault on a U.S. bank, the economic consequences would have been ‘an order of magnitude greater’ than those cased by the physical attack on the World Trade Center. Mike McConnell has subsequently referred to cybersecurity as the ‘soft underbelly of this country.’."
-SB 773
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Michael_McConnel...-
63%
Endoscopy8 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The problem is that it flies in the face of legislation like HIPAA. There the government demands that privacy of information requires strong defensive measures against invasion by outsiders. Now the government will be the invader? This is a nonsense kind of law and will get a lot of people very upset. This law is not about protection but invasion by the government. Wron plan if in relation to 9/11.
Reply-
57%
nostalgia8 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"The problem is that it flies in the face of legislation like HIPAA. There the government demands that privacy of information requires strong defensive measures against invasion by outsiders."
Reply
Just imagine what they can do with health records if the Feds nationalize health care!-
-
100%
Pecossam8 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
DenCuddy,
Reply
Yes, the same type of insurance Fidel Castro has, the type where if one requires a Gastro-Intestinal operation, one must contact a CAPITALIST country to obtain a Specialist to perform the operation. Yeah, GREAT idea, DenCuddy!
-
-
-
67%
jovial8 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Here's your statement barely 2 months ago, you hypocrite.
Reply
"ROTFLMAO
"Couldn't 9/11 have been avoided with better security?"
We fixed the problem of the Clinton created firewalls between the intelligence agencies and created the Patriot Act to defend the country by providing better security. The result is no successful attacks to date. But just listen to liberals rant that incoming calls from al Qaeda phones might be bugged. Horrors of horrors some one living here might be bugged. Trampling their rights etc. etc. etc. Listen to the idea that our right are being trampled in other ways."
http://www.propeller.com/story/2009/02/03/afghanis...
-
-
-
100%
jovial8 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Why anyone would even use worldnetdaily as a source.
Reply
In 2000, it published a series of 20 attack articles by Charles C. Thompson II and Tony Hays that (it brags) cost Al Gore the election because they allegedly caused him to lose Tennessee, a state that, had he won, would have made the Florida turmoil moot. But the article contained false claims about a Gore supporter, Clark Jones -- a fact it was finally forced to admit more than seven years later to settle a libel and defamation lawsuit from Jones. Not only did WND admit that "no witness verifies the truth" of what was said about Jones, "the sources named in the publications have stated under oath that statements attributed to them in the articles were either not made by them, were misquoted by the authors, were misconstrued, or the statements were taken out of context." -
67%
jovial8 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
In 2004, WND uncritically repeated unverified rumors about a John Kerry affair and never apologized when they were proven false. It peddled every misleading or completely false claim made by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth -- then hired Jerome Corsi, co-author of the book that first promoted those claims, as a reporter. WND published a Kerry attack book by the discredited conservative activist David Bossie, about whom WND itself asserted a few years earlier was "either extremely incompetent or was intentionally trying to sabotage investigations" in his previous role as an anti-Clinton investigator for a House committee. And WND editor Joseph Farah himself falsely claimed that money donated to a group by Kerry's wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry, went to "radical causes"; in fact, it was earmarked toward specific environmental projects.
Reply
Want to read more about the nefarious and deceitful goings on by Worldnet daily? Here's the link.
http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/stories/2008/wndliar...
You guys are pitiful, to associate with these clowns only tarnishes your reputation as well.
-
loading ...
MacR
Klarissa
nostalgia
MisterX
Wolfie2007
tadair919
k9kssr
Pecossam
ranchhasawhiteass
Ciera-Marie
CRYMTYPHON
DenCuddy
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.