President Obama announces plan to create 'world-class' railway »

Posted By Eagle_Eye 6 months, 3 weeks ago in News

The president announces an initiative to create a "world-class" railway.

Read Full Story at cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com »

647 Views Share Story 54 Comments Report

Submitted By:
Eagle_Eye

I am a female who has lived a complex life with complex situations and have learned a lot from my experiences.

I love the Environment ...

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 54 (view all)
- Display
  • 100%
    Eagle_Eye6 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    yes we can!!! I luv my Prez, LOL, LOL go Obama your the man!!!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    Eagle_Eye6 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I think that if they build a great rail system for our country that it will help with transportation problems on the roads and in the air.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      cowboygrandpa6 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Looks like America is going to be getting away from private cars on the roads and into rail travel.
      Hmmmm!!!

      Makes me wonder what the big three auto makers will be manufacturing in the future.

      Good submission EE.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      3 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 67%
      Daylight6 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      America should have spent their money on developing infrastructure than busting the money on wars that nobody benefit but Zionists.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      3 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      truthiness6 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I have been talking about this with my friends for years (being someone who doesn't drive as result of epilepsy)

      the biggest cost to airlines is commuter flights, nock them out and replace with high speed rail corridors from boston to miami, chicago to new orleans, seattle to san diego, san francisco to new york, and san diego to atlanta. (with stops between obviously)

      let the govt own the rail and private enterprise own the cars and rent time on the rails.

      add to that improved urban transit systems with the same govt/private partnership and we got ourselves a job creating, economy stimulating, green infrastructure for the 21st century.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        jordan116 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Driving my dad home from a trip to Sacramento last week, he pointed out the longest freight train I've ever seen. After several miles we realized we'd never catch up to the engine. As an accident many miles up slowed us to 25mph on the interstate, that train just flew by us. The huge cargo containers would have put scores of 18 wheelers on the roads. I agree that trains are an excellent idea for transport, not to mention travel. I'd rather ride a train than fly.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        4 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 89%
        Goppy6 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        MY GOD ... it's like this president feels like we can be every bit as innovative and forward thinking as the rest of the Industrialized world.

        Wow ... I never knew throwing over the Dreary Ideology of Modern Republicanism could result in such dramatic, positive thinking about our nation.

        Imagine, just 6 months ago, we were led to believe by Republicans that ...'America and Americans are stupid and our nation can't do anything but build weapons systems' and provide welfare for the wealthy.

        Now - we can prove America is every bit as innovative as the rest of the world.

        Thank God we've finally cast off the CAN'T DO Millstone of Modern Republicanism.
        .

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
      • 0%
        lovemylibs6 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Then why haven't we taken nuclear power lessons from the French?

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        17 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 33%
        mstew19616 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        It's a great idea, but that is about it. It is another way to look like a "progressive" thinker, great programs, great projects, etc until they have to be financed and built. A high speed rail system would never be cost effective. Our country is too spread out to make it efficient. If you dont believe this ride a Greyhound bus from city to city. A train altough faster would have to make so many stops to draw enough paying passengers it would take forever to get anywhere. Fly or drive is still the most cost effective way to travel, and you pay for what YOU use, not to keep a goverment rail system employed by too many overpaid goverment workers. Look at the postal system, its broke and then look at UPS. Privately owned by employees and super efficient.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        parrotnorth6 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Until the person riding the train can get into his own car at the end of the train ride the idea is a bust. Everyone wants to be able to get around at their destination. the cost of renting a car is what makes driving long distance the money breaker in the decision process. Add to that that most train stations are in a bad section of town. Only people from New York get along without owning a car, and can walk the distances between places to go. Who wants to get off a train take a taxi/bus to a auto rental place and pay through the nose? Its why AMTRAC is a bust. Same problem.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          Eagle_Eye6 months, 3 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Why thank you luv, I wear every drop and neg as a badge of honor

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 50%
            richwklein6 months, 3 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            It's a nice idea. It's also one that has been floating around for decades in this country. The problem is one of scale. The president uses France as an example of implementing this technology. France has a size of 643,427 sq km. The United States has a size of 9,161,923 sq km.

            Because of the shear size and distance between city centers, the concept of high speed rail is highly unfeasible.

            We can't maintain the highway, air, and rail system as it is. How are we going to maintain an aditional system?

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • 67%
              DarkWizard6 months, 3 weeks ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              "Because of the shear size and distance between city centers, the concept of high speed rail is highly unfeasible."

              Yes, so is almost every great endeavor before it's accomplished. Modern marvels exist because men and women of vision attempted the impossible. The naysayer crowd is still sitting in the cave in awe of fire. The rest of us are embracing a future outside of that cave. Welcome to our future.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply

              2 Replies

              loading loading ...
            View All 54 Comments

            Add a Comment

            Sign In With Your Propeller Account

            Forgot your password?

            Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

            To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.