« Back to story "FBI spied on TEA Party Americans!"

Story Comments

Posted by: RedRiverJ 7 months, 3 weeks ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

50%
RedRiverJ7 months, 3 weeks ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

FTA-According to this unimpeachable source, a single-page confidential directive issued by the FBI headquarters in Washington, DC (FBIHQ) was sent to each of the 56 field offices located across the United States on or about March 23, 2009, instructing the Special Agents in Charge (SACs) of those offices to verify the date, time and location of each TEA Party within their region and supply that information to FBI headquarters in Washington.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
24 Replies

loading ...
- PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive5 Replies
  - 50%
    RedRiverJ7 months, 3 weeks ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    ah, yes pschohosebeast the typical liberal venom! Thanks for not letting me down, I knew it would be you to draw the race card on an issue that has nothing to do with race.
    Thanks ever so much, your venom makes my point!
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    4 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - 67%
      DenCuddy7 months, 3 weeks ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      RRJ, if the premise of this story wasn't bullshat, you might have a leg to stand on. Americans will fight your lies at every turn, we deserve better than you.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      3 Replies
      
      loading ...
      - 20%
        RedRiverJ7 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Hey, sounds good to me! Anything other than liberal leaning stories is lies in your world.
        Thank God there are those that know the real truth.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        90%
        bluetexasvalley7 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Ah, yes, RRJ. I well remember how you screamed bloody murder and stomped your feet when the FBI were spying on the anti-Vietnam war demonstrations and every other demonstration taking place in our country since then.
        
        ROFLMAO!
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        loading ...
        
        29%
        RedRiverJ7 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        HUH? Vietnam, not quiet that old to know that much about Vietnam........
        
        Here's the point right here.........
        http://www.propeller.com/story/2009/04/20/interest...
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
- 83%
  mesodude7 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  George W. Bush's domestic spying
  
  "Only months after the events of September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush signed a presidential order in 2002 which "secretly authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States to search for evidence of terrorist activity without the court-approved warrants ordinarily required for domestic spying, according to government officials," James Risen and Eric Lichtblau reported in the December 15, 2005, New York Times. "
  
  http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=George_...
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  11 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned10 Replies
    - 83%
      hamy7 months, 3 weeks ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      But now YOU are saying that it's wrong to spy on protesters when before, during Bush, you were all for it. So why now? Is it because you're party isn't in power anymore?
      
      Hypocrite.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      7 Replies
      
      loading ...
      - 0%
        tanglang7 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Did LibsR are say it was ok for Bush to spy on folks at rallies?
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        6 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        67%
        Bacalao7 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        No, just in their homes.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        4 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        0%
        tanglang7 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Where did he say that?
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        67%
        hamy7 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        In his support of the Bush administration's wire tapping.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        0%
        tanglang7 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        He supported the wiretapping of people who call nations that support terrorism. How is that anywhere near the same as supporting the spying on Americans and political rallies?
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        loading ...
        
        100%
        hamy7 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Um...there are several articles on here of the Bush administration spying on people who attended rallies against him. You just choose not to remember them.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 10) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        50%
        hamy7 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Yes. He did. Because he sure didn't have a problem when Bush was doing the spying on American citizens.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
    - 75%
      mesodude7 months, 3 weeks ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      "Speaking of "domestic spying," did you libbies notice how it's still being used by Obama?..."
      
      --How else is he gonna find out what Bush, Cheney, Rove, and Rummy were really up to? I care as much about this as cons cared about millions of missing WH e-mails and massive Justice Department corruption. ZILCH
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      1 Reply
      
      loading ...
      - 100%
        Bacalao7 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        I am sorry to here you feel that way Mesodude. I am against warrant less spying on Americans period.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
- 67%
  Dionys7 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  "According to this unimpeachable source,"
  
  Usualy when someone has to emphasize that their source is unimpeachable, their source is worth dog ****e.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  3 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - 55%
    RedRiverJ7 months, 3 weeks ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    why not drop the author's a line and share your intelligent remarks and see how they respond?
    As a matter of fact I think I will do that myself....on your behalf.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    2 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned1 Reply
      - RedRiverJComment removed: Spam
- libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned1 Reply
  - 80%
    hamy7 months, 3 weeks ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    Um...the media reported the people who were there. If there were inbred rednecks on the TV and in the paper, that is because those inbred rednecks were there at those "events." And Fox news is the one who made it look like they were sponsoring it because they promoted it every five minutes. It's just like the Pride Parade. Don't blame the media for only showing the flamboyant ones when you are all part of the same "movement."
    
    And if you are going to talk about the bill being passed without being read, then you should be protesting the Patriot Act too. It wasn't read by more than half of the republicans who passed it. And that Patriot Act is what gives the FBI the power to spy on these "protesters." So you must DOUBLY be protesting that Act.
    Right? No? Oh, that's right, you're a hyporcrite.
    
    And one more time, I hope to high heaven that when you have some catastrophe in your life and need medicare or social security to help you that someone slams that door in your face and screams "NO HANDOUTS!" You heartless prick.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    0 Replies
    
    loading ...

Post Reply

You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

People Who Liked This Comment (14)

People Who Didn't Like This Comment (14)

Submit a Story

Advertisement