« Back to story "Analysis knocks down theory on origin of cell structure - MIT News Office"

Story Comments

Posted by: cloud15 8 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 100%
    cloud158 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Very interesting article. We briefly discussed how cells came into existence recently in a biology class I'm taking. The idea of endosymbiosis seems to be a pretty solid means to eukaryote cell development.

    I think an important thing to be discussed is how the organelles inside the eukaryotic cells came to be in the first place. We think we know how they merged to form one cell, but how did they themselves come into existence?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      CRYMTYPHON8 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I thought the article was saying that the 'merging' may not have happened; that at least some developed inside the cell, by process unknown?

      Not for cilia, anyway.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        cloud158 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Well yes, the article specifically talked about cilia and how its most likely cilia didn't come to be through endosymbiosis. Other organelles such as mitochondria or chloroplasts were not part of the experiment (from my understanding).

        "But the new analysis by Hyman Hartman, visiting scientist in MIT's Center for Biomedical Engineering, and Temple Smith of Boston University, published in the April issue of the journal Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton, provides strong evidence that this idea cannot be true for the origin of cilia. They found that genes that produce the cilia have unique characteristics that are not present in the kinds of simple cells that would have led to the symbiotic union. That suggests that cilia may have originated earlier, within the evolving cell, through a process that remains to be understood."

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (2)

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

    No one voted this comment negatively.

    Submit a Story

    Advertisement

    Story Tags ?

    mit cells biology living_cells genomic

    Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

    Dropping This Article

    view all »

    Groups Watching This

    No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

    Also Submitted By

    No one else has submitted this story.