Interrogation: Extreme View Of Constitutional Law »

Posted By BenA291 8 months, 1 week ago in News

When lawyers at the Justice Department during the Bush administration said that certain interrogation techniques like waterboarding were not torture, at least one lawyer at the State Department disagreed. In 2005, Philip Zelikow was a counselor for Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. He explains to Renee Montagne why he disagreed.

Read Full Story at npr.org »

9 Views Share Story 0 Comments Report

Submitted By:
BenA291

Other Related Articles: All »

Why not submit a story?

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 0 (view all)
- Display

Add a Comment

Sign In With Your Propeller Account

Forgot your password?

Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

More News

Submit a Story

Advertisement

Story Tags ?

constitutional interrogation extreme

Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

Propping This Article

view all »

Dropping This Article

No one has dropped this story.

Groups Watching This

No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

Also Submitted By

No one else has submitted this story.