« Back to story "Obama condemns Ahmadinejad, but still wants talks"

Comments for Obama condemns Ahmadinejad, but still wants talks »

Posted By lebanonnews 8 months ago in News

Unidentified delegates walk out of the Assembly Hall as Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad addresses the High Level segment of the Durban Review Conference on racism at the United Nations European headquarters in Geneva April 20, 2009. A number of delegates walked out of a United Nations conference on racism on Monday when Ahmadinejad called Israel a racist government

Read Full Story at world-breaking-news.comyr.com »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 3
- Display
  • 100%
    Justice4All8 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Good post. Ahmadinejad is nuts but we still need to talk to him. Bush was nuts too, but at least other world leaders talked to him.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      hyperbola8 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Well, a lot of what Ahmadinejad had to say at the UN sounds foreign to Americans inside our propaganda bubble, but is applauded in a majority of the world. We are not accustomed to the language, but much (not all) of what he has to say is sensible.

      Full Text of President Ahmadinejad’s Remarks at U.N. Conference on Racism

      .... Ladies and gentlemen, let us take a look at the U.N. Security Council, which is one of the legacies of World War II and World War I. What was the logic behind their granting themselves the veto rights? How can such a logic comply with humanitarian or spiritual values? Could it be in conformity with the recognized principles of justice, equality before law, love, and human dignity? [Applause] Or rather, with discrimination, injustice, violation of human rights, or humiliation of the majority of nations and countries?

      That Council is the highest decision-making world body for safeguarding the international peace and security. How can we expect the realization of justice and peace when discrimination is legalized and the origin of law is dominated by coercion and force rather than by justice and the right?

      Coercion and arrogance is the origin of oppression and wars. Although today many proponents of racism condemn racial discrimination in their words and in their slogans, a number of powerful countries have been authorized to decide for other nations based on their own interests and at their own discretions. And they can easily ridicule and violate all laws and humanitarian values, as they have done so.

      Following World War II, they resorted to military aggression to make an entire nation homeless on the pretext of Jewish sufferings. And they sent migrants from Europe, the United States, and other parts of the world in order to establish a totally racist government in the occupied Palestine… [Delegates walk out in protest. Applause] And in fact in compensation for the dire consequences of racism in Europe… Okay, please. Thank you. And in fact in compensation for the dire consequences of racism in Europe, they helped bring to power the most cruel and repressive, racist regime in Palestine. [Applause]

      The Security Council helped stabilize this occupation regime and supported it in the past 60 years, giving them a free hand to continue their crimes. It is all the more regrettable that a number of Western governments and the United States have committed themselves to defend those racist perpetrators of genocide whilst the awakened conscience and free minded people of the world condemn aggression, brutalities and bombardments of civilians in Gaza. They have always been supportive or silent against their crimes. And before that, they have always been silent with regard to their crimes.....

      http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22462....

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        Justice4All8 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I would have to agree.
        "much (not all) of what he has to say is sensible."

        It's those little comments like "Iran has no homosexuals" that get him in trouble. The MSM loves to ignore everything else and focus on a few minor comments.

        And why does he deny the myth of the holocaust? There are people today who still insist that Hitler never wanted war just like there are people who blame the Israeli attacks on Gaza on the Palestinians. Denying the atrocities committed by the Nazis is just as bad as denying the atrocities committed by Israel.

        I'm glad that he and Obama can agree to talk.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply
        loading loading ...

    Add a Comment

    Sign In With Your Propeller Account

    Forgot your password?

    Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

    To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.