« Back to story "Fire CEO Ken Lewis of Bank of America"

Story Comments

Posted by: calitennflo 8 months, 2 weeks ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

0%
calitennflo8 months, 2 weeks ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Odd, there are better things here upon Earth, but to see them we must remove money...example...Ken is like the police chief in your community...but who fired him? Tyrants do alot of damage while they are in power...look at what Bush did. But find someone like a police Chief...that never leaves...does not have to...is not elected...what do you do?
The economy is controlled with money...we are the ways and means of everything within these borders are. What do you do? When you see the historical...for over two hundred years...it is like verifiable proof...proof by sight. We must get rid of monsy...and not Ken.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
6 Replies

loading ...
- 100%
  engineer8 months, 2 weeks ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Didn't we force Rick Wagoner out of GM? Ken has to go likewise
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  5 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user4 Replies
    - 100%
      engineer8 months, 2 weeks ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      The companies asked for TARP money. We have a right as a nation to have accountability and control. If they ran their businesses well, they wouldn't have needed the TARP money. It's not Fascist whne the government/people of the United States are the investors.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      3 Replies
      
      loading ...
      - 100%
        simonsez8 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        No ... they should have been allowed to fail. That's the way it is supposed to work.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
      - capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user
      - capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user