Scrubbed! CNN yanking tea party 'embarrassment' »
Posted By RedRiverJ 7 months, 3 weeks ago in NewsCable television news network CNN has attempted to block a video on YouTube.com that shows "tea party" protesters in Chicago confronting the network's reporter Susan Roesgen over her allegedly biased and "not fair" coverage of the event.
Read Full Story at worldnetdaily.com »
1551 Views Share Story 152 Comments Report
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentShowing 147 of 152 Comments (view all)
-
69%
RedRiverJ7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
CNN can't get around this one. This woman deliberately sought out people, twisted facts to slant this into something evil, mean, hateful, and wrong. In reality there were many, many democrats and republicans, conservatives and liberals that are concerned our government is taxing us to much, growing too fast and taking away or rights and freedoms behind our backs. The constitution gives us a right to assemble and protest our government because THEY WORK FOR US, WE DON'T WORK FOR THEM.
Reply-
-
-
-
100%
AndyJ2157 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Conservatives and Republicans have nothing left at this point except lies, name-calling and ugly, violence-tinged attacks. The fake “tea parties” promoted by the right-wing smear Faux “news” network were based on the ridiculous idea that the GOP isn’t a big-spending party.
Reply
If you don’t know about BUSH’S SEVEN TRILLION, check out the web page that CNBC has that gives a breakdown of Bush’s bailouts -- over seven trillion dollars (as of 11/08) put at risk to help out the poor struggling bankers, brokers and what was “AIG”.
Here’s the web page: http://www.cnbc.com/id/27719011
*** All or any part of this comment may be copied, re-posted, etc.
*** No copyright is claimed on it.
-
-
66%
HOUSEMD7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
yeah, the GE "network"(nbc,msnbs,cnbc) of fast talking far lEft talking heads are sure upset that, we the people, are finally speaking out.OK, let's give it to them...fire jeffry emmel, impeach obama, and sh*t can soros. all these zealouts want to turn the USA into their own little serfdom and have power over all of us. out with them and all wwho think like them. LET'S GO AMERICANS. LET'S ROLL..........
Reply-
61%
Wolfie20077 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
G.E. the company that spent millions lobbing for light bulbs that contain mercury, light bulbs that are manufactured in China. G.E. closed plants in Kentucky where the Edison light bulbs were made laying off American worker. G.E. the company who brought us global warming and all it's crazy schemes to tax and steal property rights.
Reply -
67%
vor7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"we the people, are finally speaking out.OK"
Reply
You turds are such a minority its like hearing a mouse scream at the bottom of a well!
And is your group so insipid that you didn't realize the time to speak out was in November '08? The AMERICAN PEOPLE , you know the rest of his, not this lily white seccesionist bunch who believe they speak for some imaginary majority, spoke quite loudly in the election.
Seriously, you lost an election, get over it!
Re-organize you party, try to come up with a candidate that is acceptable to the real, 21st-Century diverse melting pot that IS America and despite the rigid constraints that conservatism lays on you, try to come up with some new creative ideas. That, or prepare for obselescence.
-
-
74%
nostalgia7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
CNN was so proud of their reporter that she took a leave of absence that CNN claims is a "planned vacation."
Reply
Other news organizations commented on her behavior:
The Augusta Chronicle editorial page: "one of the most unprofessional acts of 'journalism' we've ever seen."
Mona Charen of the National Review described her actions in the interview as "downright confrontational."
National Review contributor Mark Hemingway: "I have never seen a reporter enter the fray and act personally offended by the many, many examples of outrageous behavior at a protest. There's little to be gained by it, and it's simply not professional."
Boston Herald columnist Michael Graham: Roesgen "lashed out at the participants like an angry MoveOn.org member."
This video is all over the web - site after site
CNN is going to have their hands full trying to wipe it out of existence -
57%
BB647 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I love the ABC, CNN, NBC, and the rest of the liberal media. I attended the rally in Madison. During all of their slanted reporting, none mentioned that the speakers were not only different ages but also different races.
Reply
Then again, we're the conservatives and we are taking about the typical media. They're no longer news reporters, they're little more than entertainers. I look at them like under performing Jay Lenos. Think about it. He sends people out to ask the people simple questions. They ask questions like who is the president, VP and Secretary of State. When they get the wrong answer, you get to be on TV. Get it right, you end up on the file room floor.
We no longer have real reporters. Unless the press changes and gets back to reporting the news and not creating the news, the press is dead in this nation. Until the Dan Rather wannabees are driven out, they will continue to lose market share and talk radio will grow.-
52%
Wolfie20077 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
BB64, right there are no reporters or journalists with the main stream media but I hesitate to call them entertainers. Aren't entertainers supposed to entertain, mostly they're dull and boring and anyone with half a brain and can predict what they are going to say in any situation. They're just a bunch of braying jackazzes.
Reply -
60%
GWHayduke7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
-"........none mentioned that the speakers were not only different ages but also different races. "-
Reply
Poor ol BB.
Hasta have "HIS" media spell everything out just like he likes it so he knows how to react to it.
A rational, sane person makes his own decisions based on rational, aggregate data collected in order to make an informed, processed conclusion.
"Why don't them folks in the media tell it like "I" see it?!?"
Damn libbies. -
71%
scott42617 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The three major broadcast networks - ABC, CBS, and NBC - have had decidedly right of center coverage of the news for quite some time now. Ever since President Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (allowing single corporations to swallow up multitudes of stations in every market and several networks), the rightward shift was dramatic (It is debatable that the media was really balanced or even liberal before then but - IMO - CNN was doing a better job showing a balance then than they are now). And jeez, Headline News was actually {gasp!} headline news! I can remember when MSNBC first signed on, they were very much on the right, featuring the likes of Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham (and it seemed to me that they were the Clinton impeachment channel in those days, but they probably shared that honor with the also new FOX News).
Reply
The "liberal media" may exist, but it is very tiny. In radio, yes, there is Air America on the radio and internet, but also several syndicated shows which have even larger audiences than AA, including Thom Hartmann, Mike Malloy, and Ed Schultz. Rachel Maddow still has an Air America slot, but has a larger audience on MSNBC. And Randi Rhodes just signed a new deal with Premier to relaunch her show on May 11th. But altogether- and this is important - the progressive talk audience totals less than 10% of all broadcast talk radio - an already small portion of the total radio audience - so to say it has had much of an impact is really a stretch. Still, the market exists for progressive talk and a large portion of the country is not served at all by this format. Prior to 1996 (and even after the Fairness Doctrine was finally dismantled by the Reagan FCC in 1987), it was not uncommon to hear a liberal talker net to a conservative on the same station. But soon after Clinton signed that bill, both cable talk television and talk radio took on a decidedly rightward shift with the revelation of the Lewinsky scandal (and one could argue that the press had it in for him from the beginning, but the shift on talk radio and Television was noticeable). MSNBC is decidedly liberal in their coverage, but - as I mentioned earlier - it didn't used to be that way. That shift started happening in 2006, when Tucker Carlson and Rita Cosby were dropped and Kieth Olbermann and Chris Matthews -who, at the time, was still kissing right wing butt on Hardball - were brought into the nightly prime time line-up. Matthews has since moved to the left (I call it an evolution) and he and Olbermann were joined last year by Rachel Maddow.
(....more...) -
80%
scott42617 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
(cont'd)
Reply
Bottom line is: we have a CORPORATE media. A media the worships the dollar and that will go where the ratings take them. For better or worse, thanks to Presidents Clinton and Reagan, that's what we have. "In the public interest" is not as a phrase you hear in newsrooms today, save - maybe non-commercial outlets like NPR or PBS.
"The fourth estate" - as the media used to be known prior the erosion of regulations with the elimination of the Fairness Doctrine and the Telecommunications Act of '96 because it was an unofficial check on the other three branches of government - is virtually non-existent today. And that is very troubling.....
-
-
-
sonofreasonComment removed: Hard Banned
-
56%
Commodore17 months, 3 weeks ago
-
73%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
NAZI tactics?
Reply
You mean like FOX sponsoring and organizing 'Tea Party Demonstrations'?
Okay ... I realize y'all live in a parallel universe ... let me give you a 'for instance'.
How would you react if NBC organized nationwide protests AGAINST George W. Bush's plan to go to war with Iraq?
You'd be LIVID.
Not only because it would be a threat to the Rights LOVE for invading other nations, nation building ... and spending VAST amounts of money ... but because MEDIA would be organizing against GOVERNMENT.
This is akin to a low grade PUTSCH by FOX.
Or ... at least ... that's what y'all would have called it if the above NBC scenario would have been played out.
LOL ....
Y'all are just so loony ... so loony .... I mean ... beyond words loony.
You're like the clutch of people that the 911 'TRUTHERS' shy away from because their just too freaky.
-----------------
And I didn't even MENTION the fact that Arch-Conservative Media Mogul ... Julian Sinclair ... who owns more independent TV outlets than anyone ... ORDERED every one of those outlets to run the Swift-Boat ads ... IN THEIR ENTIRETY .... one week before the 2000 election.
NAZI-ism .... indeed.
Y'all DREAM of a NAZI-style regime ... with forced Propaganda ... ala-Fox and SBC ... and Rush Limbaugh ... Sean Hannity ... Bill O'Reilly ... and on ... and on ... and on ...
.
So pathetic in all your whining.
It's why America hates y'all.
It's why you lose every election now.
Y'all are such whiners.
.
-
-
libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned2 Replies
-
50%
simonsez7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Thanks for getting this out there, Red. I had heard about it, but hadn't seen it. Unbelievable to me that she can stay on television after this.
Reply
After 70 years, this is truly the first time I have felt fear of our Government. Disgust many times, but not fear.
We have to continue to speak out to keep them from destroying us. -
44%
BB647 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
So will anyone from the left finally admit the Ted Turner network, CNN, the Communist New Network, is not fair or balanced? For years we're heard how evil FOX is but never the corruption from the left. Now that we actually see the fake stories, will they admit the bias?
Reply-
90%
fsev417 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Let me see now. We have one CNN reporter who may have stepped over the line in her interview and apparently has since been disciplined by CNN. And how about coming up with all of the other "fake stories" you allege. Lots of mouth but light on specifics as usual.
Reply -
-
-
-
67%
joeblowe7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
It's ALMOST funny watching that stupid broad trying to justify herself. Anyone who thinks that the "news" that is being reported ANYWHERE these days isn't strongly colored by editorial leanings needs to watch this and then think again.
Reply -
76%
Dionys7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Yeah.
Reply
FOX is so independent and middle-of-the-road that it won't even show Obama's prime-time news conference this week:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090427/ap_on_en_tv/us...
Yeah! That's fair and equal reporting!-
82%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Indeed ... and last week ... after Obama came back from his travels ... The TODAY show brought in Newt Gingrich to provide an assessment of his success or failure.
Reply
NEWT GINGRICH!
Of course it was a failure ... to which no one responded with a counter argument.
Well ... Newt DID let it be known that he's testing the waters to see if he can run for President in 2012. I guess GE is giving him additional exposure.
Well ... Newt's got ONE of the Modern Republican's Requirements to run for President .... he's an Hypocrite and an Adulterer.
He's so special ... he went on a national tour condemning the marital infidelities of Bill Clinton ... WHILE HE WAS CHEATING ON HIS OWN WIFE WITH A MUCH YOUNGER ASSISTANT.
.
See? Morally Vacant candidate for a Morally Vacant Ideology.
. -
-
67%
BB647 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Dion, please explain to me how not showing another campaign piece from the Obama team is not equal? First, announcing he's lasted 100 days shouldn't be a big deal. Most presidents do. Secondly, if he wants to buy ad time, then buy it. Don't hide behind the White House news conference.
Reply
As to fair and balanced, I think they come a lot closer than the rest.
-
-
44%
4thchance7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Wow, this is nuts how the media is doing all they can to keep the truth from coming out on ANYTHING that makes the Democrats look bad. It's not long now folks before we will only be allowed to hear one side of all news stories...that would be the LEFTS view of those stories. Good Bye America, Hello North Korea.... We're screwed!
Reply -
85%
scott42617 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This story is just bulls**t. Videos get yanked from YouTube for copyright infringement all the time. This is making something out of nothing.
Reply
Are we to believe that the tea parties were events that sprung up simultaneously with no help from FOX News? Given the way the events of that day unfolded, that really seems unlikely.
The whole notion that there is a liberal media push to subvert the tax party message is without merit. The truth is that these events were heavily promoted by FOX News to create this faux populist anger over taxes which most of the average people will never realize in their own lives. The vast majority of us - those of us making under 250,000 (and yes, that also includes the majority of us who make more than 30,000 but less than 250,000) are receiving a tax cut, but NONE of that gets through...instead, they manipulate people who are uneducated in the complexities of the issues and emotions over the war on terror in hopes of organizing the Republican Party around those cells of anger. These economic conservatives are using mouthpieces like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Glen Beck to stir up the stupid among us because THEY REALLY HAVE NO PLAN, OTHER THAN MORE TAX CUTS.-
47%
4thchance7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
scott4261
Reply
I don't beleive that Fox news is behind all the tea Parties. Even if they were behind them, what's so bad about that anyway? BIG DEAL, real Americans are coming out and protesting against tax hikes and big government spending. AGAIN, what the big deal here, what's so wrong with Americans showing the Government that they disapprove of their spending and taxing us to death? Please explain why the tea parties are such a horrible thing. AND NO, the tea parties are not about racism, that's just plain dumb to say that they are about racism.
BTW, there is news coming out that Obama's promise to not to raise taxes on 95% of Americans, is being scraped. He is planning to tax us all more then ever. -
60%
RedRiverJ7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
If it's BS then why is CNN wanting all signs of this interview taken off the web. I'll tell you why, this points out they are BIAS in your face nasty. They have demonized anyone conservative on their broadcasts they have most of the simpletons that watch their station believing their stupid hateful claims.
Reply
This reporter proves it and CNN doesn't like it. -
80%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Hey scott ... I just wanted to let you know that it didn't escape my notice that you countered my claim that Chris Matthews was a big John McCain Supporter.
Reply
(all in good fun btw ... I know you're a rational person ... not a right wing loony).
So here are some comments I posted awhile back.
For instance, On Tuesday, January 23, 2007, Chris said ...
""McCain "deserve[s] the presidency""
I can't remember if this is before or after Chris Matthews spent half his program explaining why he loved John McCain ... the 'war hero'.
.. -
80%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
scott, on On Thursday, February 15, 2007, Chris said ... as part of his undying love for McCain ...
Reply
I love McCain's "maverick reputation. But he went on to admire the "jib" of Mitt Romney's chin.
WOW .... Chris' obsession with Romney's looks is in conflict with the feelings in his heart for McCain the Maverick.
Chris is a dyed in the wool Republican ... no doubt.
. -
78%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This comment of Chris' added to my assessment, scott.
Reply
On Sunday, November 11, 2007, Chris Matthews repeats ...
"John McCain DESERVES to be President."
Wow ... too bad there was this thing called "The Electorate" who disagreed with Chris Matthews.
.
LOL!
. -
80%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
And while I respect your opinion that Chris Matthews supported Obama ... I feel you must not have caught every Hard Ball episode, scott ...
Reply
Like this one ..
On Monday, December 3, 2007, Chris Matthews described Obama as ....
" ... almost Third World in his sort of presentation"
I guess Chris didn't realize that the Bush Administration had almost succeeded in converting our nation into a Third World nation ... complete with TORTURE.
. -
78%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Here's further evidence that I found to support my contention that Chris Matthews supported John McCain for President.
Reply
Even so, as the nomination campaign pointed to John McCain as the ultimate winner ... Chris pulled out all the stops on Wednesday, January 30, 2008, when he famously said to John McCain ....
... "Senator, you know you're in my heart"
Maybe that's why McCain lost ... he was in Chris' dark heart ... and no one could find him!
.
. -
78%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This comment made me a TRUE BELIEVER that Hard Ball should have a name change to SOFT BALL.
Reply
For instance ... on Wednesday, January 30, 2008, Chris gave accolades to John-John's ability that even John-John denied having ... when on his show he heaped praise McCain's "candor" and "honest[y]" on economic knowledge"
Even now ... you just GOTTA laugh at the chutzpah of Right Wing Media Talking Heads daring to call Chris Matthews a Liberal.
Just think .... John McCain ... Economic Powerhouse!
Who knew? -
80%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
And scott ...
Reply
On Thursday, March 6, 2008, STILL pushing the love of his life ... John McCain ... Chris Matthews says of Obama and Hillary ...
... "Pennsylvania prefers a beefier sort to either of these people, a more rustic, tougher sort than" Obama or Clinton!"
Didn't Pennsylvania go to Obama?
Yes, I believe it did! -
80%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
And Chris didn't shy away from Rev. Jerimiah Wright either.
Reply
On Thursday, April 3, 2008, Chris Matthews is thumping his chest at his confrontational questioning to Obama of Reverend Jerimiah Wright .... .... .... Obama smiled and said ... ... ...
"I hear you say controversial things, Chris"
Of course, "The MAN ... Liberal Media ... CUT that remark and it didn't appear on air ... which was captured later ....
I guess that comment was cut ... for time ... ? ? ?
LOL!! -
80%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Now scott ... tell me if you really believe Chris Matthews was supporting Obama after reading this ...
Reply
I myself can't tell if this comment is just plain racist ... or ignorant ...
Well ... he'd already DEMANDED that John McCain DESERVED to be President ... so I guess we can see where he's coming from. .. .. ..
So, on Wednesday, April 2, 2008, Chris said this ...
"Does Obama "connect with regular people" or just African-Americans and college grads?"
Wow ... Chris ... you know you are in my heart ... as a bona fide Right Wing Jerk.
. -
80%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Of course, the above comment was made before THIS gem ...
Reply
On Monday, March 31, 2008, Chris said this ... "[T]his gets very ethnic, but the fact that he's good at basketball doesn't surprise anybody"
What's the matter Chris ... can't you jump?
LOL! -
80%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
On Tuesday, April 15, 2008, Chris Matthews decided he wanted to crack the campaign wide open and give John McCain an opportunity to FULLY EXPLAIN his deepest thoughts on America ....
Reply
... which is when he asked his John-John this deeply probing question ...
"[W]e've had enough softball, Senator. ... Is Barack Obama an elitist?"
.
We can really count on Chris to do a grand job of elevating the national debate! -
80%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
On Friday, April 18, 2008, Chris Matthews was revisiting the "person you feel more comfortable with" ... you know ... the way millions of Right Wing Americans voted for George W. Bush because he 'seemed like he'd be more fun to have a beer with'.
Reply
It was in this frame of mind that Chris Matthews posed the concept ...
""Obama "can't walk into a dinette with five or six guys there, white guys, in some cases ... He can't just shake hands and hang out""!
Why does he say that, I wonder ... isn't Obama a human being?
Or is it that ... with McCain in his heart ... there just isn't any room for another Presidential candidate? -
-
80%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
On Tuesday, April 29, 2008, Chris Matthews consolidates the entire Jeremiah Wright issue this way ...
Reply
"Wright and Obama, are "different faces of the same guy"
So, what exactly is that supposed to mean ... all blacks think alike?
Hey ... THAT IS the Republican Platform!
.
. -
80%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
On Wednesday, June 4, 2008, fed up with Obama ... Chris Matthews sniped ...
Reply
"Obama was never middle class, does not "have that experience that ... most Americans have"
Well ... that IS true ... most Americans actually SEE their dads more than once in their lifetime.
. -
80%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Still focusing on Obama and the 'sport connection' ... on Wednesday, May 14, 2008, Chris Matthews said of Obama. .. .. . .. .. . and his bball penchant.
Reply
"[I]t's not what most people play. People with money play pool these days"
Wow ... was that a slap?
.
Well, I guess he's just feeling desperate that John-John McCain was trailing in the polls at this point.
. -
80%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Pandering to the 'single issue' voter ... on Monday, June 16, 2008, Chris Matthew said ...
Reply
"I don't hear Democrats talk ... about the need to reduce the number of abortions,"
Of course, he conveniently ignored that Democrats HAVE talked about making abortions safe ... and RARE ... ON HIS VERY PROGRAM!
.
. -
80%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
In a clear case of Right Wing Partisan Bias in Media ...
Reply
On Friday, June 13, 2008, Chris Matthews lied when he said this ...
"McCain holds statistically significant lead over Obama among white suburban women"
There was NEVER a time when McCain held any statistical lead among white suburban women.
But of course ... I don't think that Chris really has women on his mind at this point.
After all ... he had John-John in his heart.
. -
80%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
On Thursday, June 12, 2008, Chris Matthews says ...
Reply
"Obama's running mate should be "[s]omeone who's palpably patriotic,"
... I guess because he doesn't think Obama is acceptably patriotic.
This was during the time Obama was seen not wearing his little flag pin.
LOL ... Right Wing Pundits are SOOO incisive! LOL
Of course .. this is the same show in which he calls women voters "low-hanging fruit" ... I think his point is here that women are empty headed voters without the ability to assess a candidate.
Ouch! -
78%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
On Monday, July 7, 2008, Right Wing Pundit, Chris Matthews posed this question....
Reply
"Can Obama now win over the regular folks, white folks, against John McCain?"
Or said another way ... Is it possible that my endless efforts to convince America that Mavericky McCain DESERVES to be president may possibly be failing on deaf ears of 'normal' Americans?
Hey, if NORMAL means being like Chris Matthews ... I think I'll pass!
.
LOL!
.
Reply -
78%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
On Saturday, September 27, 2008, Chris Matthews gave his own special brand of Right Wing Spin after the debate ... causing him to ask this probing question ...
Reply
"[D]id it surprise you that he was so un-ethnic tonight?"
Un-ethnic?
Hmm ... sounds like Chris might be coming around to Obama ... as long as he's not .... TOO Black!
.
-
-
-
-
93%
Ciera-Marie7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
On the local news tonight guess what they're talking about? Iraq? Afghanastan? Problems returning servicemen/women have transitioning back into civilan life? Job that's guaranteed theirs if they're called up...is it still? Mortgage crisis? Homelessness? The torture memos? Or how about more importantly the importance of Coleman dragging the appeals process out, going back on his word? Or Michelle's latest outlandish comments? Better yet a report from last Friday's St. Cloud Stand Down? Nope.
Reply
Nope wrong. No they're talking about if in a marriage is it okay for a husband to have female friends and a wife to have male friends. That's what they're talking about. A rival network almost a month and half ago did an expose on local super heros. Apparently the Twin Cities has caped crusaders running around. This is exactly why I stopped watching the news in 2000.
-
-
sonofreasonComment removed: Hard Banned4 Replies
-
60%
Icantwait7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
My Fellow Americans: Is it any wonder that after all the sensible comments the same old "It's Bushes Fault Critics", jump on board with nothing more to say than that ,with the evidence visibly before their own eyes. I understand that Mr Obama has breakfast, with key news media individuals and staff from all major stations and newspapers. Laughing and joking and carrying on in the White House all to promote one side of each story. The Presidential agenda side so is it any wonder the news is slanted to the Left. He washes their hand and they wash his, however, I hope he washed his after he shook hands with the slime flu individual that passed away recently. Well, the slime was passed one way or the other no doubt about that. Rest easy Americans we are getting there and we won't stop until our Country is restored to it's past greatness. The Real American.
Reply -
60%
Justice4All7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I attend a Tea Bag party Texas. Not on purpose, but I was on business and just happened to be near one. Besides, I think taxes are way too high.
Reply
But it was just a bunch of uneducated ignorant rednecks from the suburbs who hated Obama. The way to cut taxes is to cut spending. That includes wars based on lies. Bush got us into this mess and these people want to blame Obama. They even tried to blame him before he took office. -
SandmonsterComment removed: Hard Banned2 Replies
-
-
-
-
75%
Goppy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
LOL ... you bring ONE oblique comment as PROOF of Chris Matthew's bias towards Obama ... to counter ... let's see TWENTY TWO comments DIRECTLY SUPPORTING John McCain.
Reply
Man .. you are REALLY sucking on that Kool-Aid.
Here's a clue ... never bring a knife to a gun fight.
Or ... DO bring a knife to a gun fight ... it's a pleasure to shoot your pathetic little example full of holes with my Barrett 50 cal.
LOL
My God ... not only are the Rabid Righties Whining Marketers for FOX the business ... they are too stupid to realize they are being manipulated.
.
Actually ... it's somewhat sad.
.
-
-
33%
Calypso5617 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Boston Tea Party: (source,United States History: Heritage of Freedom)...ABeka Books.
Reply
In 1773, new trouble developed between England and the colonies when Parliament made a blundering attempt to help the nearly bankrupt East India Company. Up to this time, law required the East India Company to sell its tea through middlemen in England. Duties were levied both when the tea passed through English ports and when it arrived in a colonial port. In May 1773, Parliament adopted legislation allowing East India Company to ship its tea directly to the colonies, avoiding middlemen and the payment of duties in England. Even with the import duty at colonial ports, the company could sell its tea at a price below that of tea smuggled in from Holland. The East India Company would have a virtual monopoly on the tea in the colonies.
Despite the lower price of British tea, the American colonists refused to buy it. They were infuriated that Parliament would grant a monopoly to the East India Company and insulted that Parliament would expect them to compromise on the principle for the sake of their pockebooks. In Charleston, the tea had to be protected by customs officials in government warehouses. In New York and Philadelphia, the tea-laden ships were ordered to turn around and return to England. But in Boston, Governor Hutchinson refused a citizen request to ship the tea back to England. Thus, on the night of December 16, 1773, a band of citizens disguised as Indians boarded the tea-laden ships in the Boston Harbor and, under the cover of darkness, dumped 340 chests of tea into the harbor. Although the men were careful to harm nothing but the tea itself, the Boston Tea Party, as it was called, outraged the British authorities.
In response to the Boston Tea Party, Parliament decided to punish Massachussetts and, by doing so, to set an example that would keep the other colonies in subjection. In 1774, Parliament passed a series of acts it called the Coercive Acts: the colonists called them the "Intolerable Acts." The first of these acts, the Boston Port Bill, closed the port of Boston until the East India Company could be reimbursed for the destroyed tea.
There were three more "Acts"... the Administration of Justice Act, The Massachusetts Government Act, and the Quartering Act. Research them yourself.
By the way, Fox News did NOT create the 'Tea Parties', a man in, I believe, Connecticut, started it. Not sure about the state. Fox News DID promote it, GLADLY. -
80%
jordan117 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Why would CNN try to stop the video? Their reporter was correct. Faux news made a pitiful attempt to make the so called 'tea party' bi-partisan, while 99% of the time the commentators bashed liberals, CNN, Obama, Democrats. I know. I watched.
Reply
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.