« Back to story "A Case for International War Crimes Tribunals"

Story Comments

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
hyperbola8 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Why is Hezbollah, but not Israel, on the Terrorism List?

There is no evidence of terrorism by Hezbollah, which regularly condemns acts of terrorism on religious grounds. AIPAC has pressured the State Dept. into putting Hezbollah on the list on phony grounds. In contrast, there are more than 6600 documented acts of israeli state terrorism against Lebanon in the period 1967-2007.

http://www.counterpunch.org/lamb04062007.html

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
4 Replies

loading ...
- 100%
  dailyblueberry8 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  "There is no evidence of terrorism by Hezbollah..."
  
  Just did a quick search and the 9/11 commision report came up.
  
  http://www.newsday.com/media/acrobat/2004-07/13520...
  
  One line states..."In 1983 came Hezbollah’s massacre of the Marines in Beirut."
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  3 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    Ratskii8 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    Hezbollah wasn't in existance as an organization in 1983. They may have some members in common with the organization that killed the marines, but I don't think it was the same organization that exists today.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    2 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - Neutral
      dailyblueberry8 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      Maybe the commission was wrong?
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      1 Reply
      
      loading ...
      - Neutral
        hyperbola8 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Actually if you read the article to which I provided the link above, your question was answered.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...