Supreme Court rules against free speech in broadcasting »

Posted By memestryker 7 months, 1 week ago in News

WASHINGTON; The Supreme Court ruled narrowly Tuesday in favor of a government policy that threatens broadcasters with fines over the use of even a single curse word on live television, yet stopped short of deciding whether the policy violates the Constitution (although it clearly does). To avoid fines, a station would have to pre-record all material and block all words ruled vulgar.

Read Full Story at foxnews.com »

299 Views Share Story 32 Comments Report

Submitted By:
memestryker

I'm a Nature lover and a strong advocate for civil rights. My current top political issues focus on the U.S. Constitution, including supporting ...

Other Related Articles: All »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 32 (view all)
- Display
  • 71%
    memestryker7 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    This case resulted from 2 music awards shows where speakers used the "f" word in unprepared comments. SCOTUS attempted to sidestep the first amendment, but the ruling clearly encroaches on it.

    Even small broadcasters operating on shoestring budgets can now be forced to pre-record all material and remove all words deemed vulgar by the FCC to avoid fines.

    The Thought Police are getting closer all the time.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 83%
    Klarissa7 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    So who defines vulgar words, I'm thinking of the National Geographic shows and history shows, and tapes of events.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • 71%
    frctm57 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    The supreme court is another casualty of the Bush administration. Hopefully Scalia, or Thomas will vacate a seat.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 80%
    Will13137 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Scalia, joined by his four conservative colleagues, said the FCC "could reasonably conclude that the pervasiveness of foul language, and the coarsening of public entertainment in other media" justified a stricter policy "so as to give conscientious parents a relatively safe haven for their children."

    ---

    conservatives ..party of PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY.. shouldn't those PARENTS monitor what their kids are watching.. and would it not be assumed that a rapper who's songs are bout killing, rape, and degradation of women.. might indeed say FXXK....

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    6 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 25%
    quackpot7 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    These folks need to update their knowledge of the American Language.

    In current American usage, he S-word has several meanings other than excretion. Similarly, the F-word also has several meanings.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 50%
    hamy7 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I don't have children. I don't plan on adopting any. Why should I be denied programming that I want to see because some gal couldn't keep her legs closed?

    You chose to have children. You monitor what they watch. I think it's funny that someone like Libs who, since the election, is all about "small government, get the government out of our lives" is all about having the government decide what we can watch and what we can't. So it's up to the government to protect your kids from evil swear words on a nighttime television program, but not to help you when you lose your job.

    Right?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    8 Replies

    loading loading ...
View All 32 Comments

Add a Comment

Sign In With Your Propeller Account

Forgot your password?

Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

More News