Your fellow Propeller readers consider this story to be controversial.

A guide to the Political Left »

Posted By Klarissa 6 months, 3 weeks ago in Political News

* Nationwide network of non-profit activist groups, whose agendas are ideologically to the left, which are engaged in campaigning for the Democrats
* Consists of more than five-dozen unions, activist groups, and think tanks
* Activities include fundraising, get-out-the-vote drives, political advertising, and covert operations
* Conceived and organized principally by George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Harold McEwan Ickes

The so-called "Shadow Democratic Party," or "Shadow Party," is a nationwide network of more than five-dozen unions, non-profit activist groups, and think tanks whose agendas are ideologically to the left, which are engaged in campaigning for the Democrats.

Its activities include fundraising, get-out-the-vote drives, political advertising, opposition research, and media manipulation.

The Shadow Party was conceived and organized principally by George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Harold McEwan Ickes -- all identified with the Democratic Party left.

Read Full Story at discoverthenetworks.org »

743 Views Share Story 118 Comments Report

Submitted By:
Klarissa

Berkeley conservative. Don't ask to be my friend unless you have a real bio.Eat your dessert first, life is uncertain. Bridge player, water ...

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 118 (view all)
- Display
  • 65%
    Klarissa6 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    "A political consultancy called the Thunder Road Group (TRG), located on the 7th Floor of the historic Motion Picture Association of America headquarters at 888 Sixteenth Street NW in Washington, DC, serves as the unofficial headquarters of the Shadow Party. Three other Shadow Party groups also lease space in the same building, including America Coming Together (ACT), America Votes, and the Partnership for America's Families.

    The clustering of these groups in a building owned by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) is significant.

    The MPAA has long enjoyed a close relationship with the Democratic Party; many high-ranking Democrats have transitioned comfortably from government jobs into glamorous posts in the MPAA's upper management. "

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    4 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 69%
    Klarissa6 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    As of August 2004, the husband-wife team of George Soros and Susan Soros had contributed $13,120,000 to Shadow Party groups and operations, second only to Soros' longtime friend and collaborator, insurance mogul Peter B. Lewis ($14,175,000).

    The third leading donor was Jane Fonda ($13,085,750), followed by Hollywood producer Stephen Bing in fourth place ($9,869,014). Other major funders of the Shadow Party include the Tides Foundation and the Open Society Institute.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 56%
    Klarissa6 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    "Wall Street billionaire George Soros is the Shadow Party's principal founder and mastermind. Clear hints of Soros' intentions began to appear as early as the 2000 election. It was then that Soros (shouldering about one-third of the cost) sponsored the so-called "Shadow Conventions." Organized by author, columnist, and socialite Arianna Huffington, the Shadow Conventions were media events designed to lure news crews from the real party conventions that year. Huffington held her "Shadow Conventions" at the same time and in the same cities as the Republican and Democratic Conventions, in Philadelphia and Los Angeles respectively, and featured leftwing critics of mainstream politics.

    The Shadow Conventions promoted Huffington's view that neither Democrats nor Republicans served the interests of the American people any longer. In Huffington's view, U.S. politics needed a third force to break the deadlock."

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 59%
    Klarissa6 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    "One of Soros' stealth PACs was an anti-gun group called The Campaign for a Progressive Future (CPF). This group sought to neutralize the influence of the National Rifle Association (NRA), by targeting for defeat any political candidate, at any level, who the NRA endorsed.

    Soros personally seeded CPF with $500,000. During the 2000 election, CPF funded political ads and direct-mail campaigns in support of state initiatives favoring background checks at gun shows.

    Soros used other 527s to agitate in favor of pro-marijuana initiatives which appeared on the ballot in various states that year.

    Donors to Soros' stealth PACs during the 2000 election cycle included insurance mogul Peter B. Lewis and InfoSeek founder Steven Kirsch, both of whom would turn up as major contributors to Soros' Shadow Party during the 2004 election season. "

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 56%
    Klarissa6 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    "To develop the Shadow Party as a cohesive entity, Harold Ickes undertook the task of building a 21st-century version of the Left's traditional alliance of the "oppressed," the disgruntled, and the "disenfranchised." He formed a coalition of pro-abortion activists, leftwing minority groups and leftwing labor unions.

    By the time Ickes was done, he had created or helped to create six new groups, and had co-opted a seventh called MoveOn.org. Together, they constitute the administrative core of the Shadow Party.

    They are: America Coming Together; America Votes; the Center for American Progress; Joint Victory Campaign 2004; The Media Fund; MoveOn.org; and the Thunder Road Group."

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    4 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 56%
    Klarissa6 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    "As of 2004, an alphabetical list of Shadow Party groups included the following:
    Air America Radio;
    America Coming Together;
    America Votes;
    American Constitution Society;
    American Federation of Labor - Congress of Industrial Organizations;
    American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees;
    American Federation of Teachers;
    Anshell Media;
    Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now;
    Association of Trial Lawyers of America;
    Band of Progressives;
    Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence;
    Campaign for a Progressive Future;
    Campaign for America's Future;
    Center for American Progress;
    Clean Water Action;
    Communication Workers of America;
    The Constitution Project;
    DASH PAC;
    Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund;
    Democracy for America;
    Democratic Governors Associations;
    Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee;
    Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee;
    Dog Eat Dog Films;
    EMILY's List;
    Environment 2004;
    Gore/Lieberman Recount Committee;
    Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union;
    the Human Rights Campaign;
    INdTV;
    International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers;
    Joint Victory Campaign 2004;
    Laborers International Union of North American;
    League of Conservation Voters;
    New Democrat Network;
    The Media Fund;
    Media Matters for America;
    Million Mom March;
    Moving America Forward;
    MoveOn.org;
    Music for America;
    National Association for the Advancement of Colored People;
    NARAL Pro-Choice America;
    National Education Association;
    National Grassroots Alliance;
    National Jewish Democratic Council;
    National Treasury Employees Union;
    New American Optimists;
    New Democrat Network;
    Partnership for America's Families;
    People for the American Way;
    Phoenix Group;
    Planned Parenthood;
    Pro-Choice Vote;
    Service Employees International Union;
    Sheet Metal Workers International Association;
    Sierra Club;
    The Thunder Road Group;
    United Food & Commercial Workers Union;
    United Progressive Alliance;
    USAction;
    Vagina Votes;
    Voices for Working Families;
    Vote for Change;
    Young Voter Alliance;
    and 21st Century Democrats."

    This amounts to a lot of money avoiding public notice.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    11 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 41%
    Wolfie20076 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    That's a real ugly list, Klarissa but thanks for posting it we need to know who our friends are and our enemies. I'm going to keep this for future referral.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    flyonthewallzz6 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Hello Klarrisa:
    I had to prop this story, out of respect for the research you put into it.
    No doubt, there are folks working behind the scenes with big money behind them.
    Both sides are putting up deceptive smoke, and it is difficult to see through it.
    I do not think that legalizing Marijuana or taking away folks guns, stand a snowballs chance.
    I support the pot thing, and would probably smoke some again if it became legal. (It has been years)
    And I would probably buy my first gun if they where outlawed. My brother and many of my friends own a bunch of them and they would probably be willing to trade something for one of them.
    I don’t know diddly about George Soros or what motivates him, or if he has in any way influenced my opinion.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    12 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 67%
    aceofspades16 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Klarissa - your post has made me proud to be called a leftist by some of you reactionaries. In many countries the left hand is considered the unclean one because it is used to wipe the ass. I'm proud to be a"lefty" - wiping away your ****

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    14 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    flyonthewallzz6 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I do not like being considered the “enemy”. And I take the time to try to understand the point of view from the right.
    I get so confused though sometimes:
    I have crossed picket lines and had major issues with trade unions, but I do not understand how they are equated with “socialism”.
    This is a spread sheet from the IRS, (sorry for the tangent).

    http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/04co16ccr.xls

    “RETURNS OF ACTIVE CORPORATIONS, FORM 1120”
    According to this sheet Salaries and wages make up less than 10% of all business receipts, and less than 6% for the manufacturing sector.
    So it appears to me that when we buy a product we spend less than .10 cents on the dollar for the labor to make it. We pay more for “other Deductions”.
    The way I read these numbers: is that if all folks where to cut their pay in half, industry could afford to cut the cost of their product by .5 cents on the dollar.
    I hope someone takes the time to check my numbers.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    13 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 94%
    tchef6 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    The Republican party has probably just as many groups and think tanks on their side all pushing their agenda. This list is just a pointless effort to push a conspiracy theory.

    Why don't you do something positive? How about spending some time working on what's wrong with your party and trying to make them relevant again? Instead of helping to push them more and more into obscurity.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 40%
    Klarissa6 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    tchef - This has nothing to do with a conspiracy theory.

    It had to do with action groups supported with a lot of money, that never appear on donor lists.

    It is their right to have these groups.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    13 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 50%
    Klarissa6 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Now, why in the world would these people donate this much money??
    George and Susan Soros $13,120,000
    Peter B. Lewis $14,175,000
    Jane Fonda $13,085,750
    Stephen Bind $ 9,869,014

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    deathray6 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    because getting to public opinion is expensive?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      truthiness6 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      as near as I can tell this article describes a group of wealthy political activists exercising there political rights in the same way groups like the NRA and PNAC do on the right.

      if one wanted to make an argument that all this money influencing our political system, on all sides, is negative corrupting influence and should be stopped.. I would whole heartedly agree.

      but arguing that there is something nefarious about the left, while the right is wholesome is.. well.. silly.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 40%
      Klarissa6 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I still think that trying to control contributions is ridiculous.

      Just let everyone contribute what they want, but it has to made public on a continuing basis.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      6 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      truthiness6 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I think the only access to the public for those campaigning should be equal time on public access communications.

      limit it to that and you eliminate the need for currency influx or the advantage gained thereby.

      when someone spends 1 mil for 150 k job.. what do you expect but corruption?

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 33%
        lloydm656 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        George Soros is not a politician,the democrats take his money,but don't care for him personally.I don't know why it hasn't happened yet,but I believe he is a marked man.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 67%
          Ratskii6 months, 3 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          For most of my life it was the republicans who far exceeded the democrats in fund raising. The term, shadow government, originated with Ronald Reagen when it was shown that a group under him was making policy decisions without his knowledge.

          Now the democrats, for a change, manage to out fund raise the republicans and there is much weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth.

          By the way Klarissa, another thing you might want to research: The influence of the right wing think tank, Freedomworks and its wealthy contributors, in organizing the tea parties.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply

          1 Reply

          loading loading ...
        • 75%
          frctm56 months, 3 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          You mean that people behind closed doors are trying to influence legislation and promote an agenda. This is supposed to be news to us? The right dominates in terms of political think tanks. In terms of politics, money equals power and its no secret that corporate America has the best access to our legislators of both parties.If there is something sinister at work here, you can't very well disparage this sort of thing on the left without conceding that the right is equally guilty.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 80%
            frctm56 months, 3 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            One thing that surprised the Right was the efficiency of grass roots campaigning as demonstrated by Obama's team which so far they are unable to match. The Republicans were blindsided by this in the last election. This is the David which toppled the Goliath of big moneyed donors on both sides of the political fence. The internet was a catalyst for true populism.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            View All 118 Comments

            Add a Comment

            Sign In With Your Propeller Account

            Forgot your password?

            Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

            To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.