CNN Poll - Majority of Americans oppose legalizing same sex marriages »

Posted By pc25 6 months, 1 week ago in News

1 of 1

A new national poll suggests that a majority of Americans oppose legalizing same sex marriages — but there's a vast generational divide on the issue.

Fifty-four percent of people questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll released Monday say that marriages between gay or lesbian couples should not be recognized as valid, with 44 percent suggests they should be considered legal.

Read Full Story at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com »

1294 Views Share Story 77 Comments Report

Submitted By:
pc25

studio engineer, studio musician, producer

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 77 (view all)
- Display
  • 56%
    pc256 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    The CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll was conducted April 23-26, with 2,019 adult Americans questioned by telephone. The survey's sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 35%
    Wolfie20076 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Marriage should be between one man and one woman. In Canada there is a movement to legalize plural marriage. What next?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    35 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    northpost096 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    GAY MARRIAGES:

    This had been along battle over the years. The media talk about gay marriages and recent changes to laws around the world allowing gays to marry.
    People around the world and the activists are challenging the establishment and fighting for the right to marry, but what are they really fighting for?

    Is it about their rights, total acceptance of t he society and the state , equality or something more??

    What is marriage by t he way??
    We all know that Marriage is about the union of two individuals, who aimed to have a lasting and successful relationship or a bond of two people but we should not also forget that this is a social, religious, spiritual or legal issue of the union of two individuals or matrimony.

    Marriage is defined by the dictionary as an institution in which interpersonal relationships (usually intimate and sexual) are acknowledged by the state, by religious authority, or both, it is often viewed as a contract. And also there's this Civil marriage which is the legal concept of marriage as a governmental institution, in accordance with marriage laws of the jurisdiction. If recognized by the state, by the religion(s) to which the parties belong or by society in general, the act of marriage changes the personal and social status of the individuals who enter into it…
    At this point the majority cannot accept gay marriages but this doesn’t mean the issue will stop here the political and legal debate about gay marriage will continue, it will be a long battle. Except in other countries like Netherlands, Belgium, Canada, Norway, South Africa, Spain and Sweden and some electoral candidate in other countries will ride on the issue to gain votes and sympathizers..
    So lets take a look on those countries that legally recognize gay marriages. Whats the effect after they legalize it? Whats the impact in society and other institution. Did it make a difference or its still the same??
    At this point, though there are lots of people who became educated about this issue and some who recognize it but there are still people who can’t accept it socially, religiously or morally. And it so happen that the majority of people in some countries dis agree with gay marriages.

    So whats the option?? a.) more campaigns and advertisement,and information drive b.) wait after afew year and try again?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 88%
      Poulenc6 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Oh, give it up, pc.! The majority of people don't get to (vote to) deny or abrogate the rights of any group of citizens. Period.

      Stop trying to prevent the sunrise. Gay marriage is here. More states will embrace it. It will become universal. And the sky won't fall.

      Find another group to discriminate against for no reason other than their presence on the planet makes you nervous.

      Better still, don't.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      3 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 91%
      Newenglander6 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      "People who say they have a gay friend or relative support same-sex marriage," Holland notes. "Most of those who say they don't know anyone who is gay oppose gay marriage." Maybe some of you(pc25,Endoscopy,Locky12,and especially Puppy 2007) should make an effort to befriend a gay couple.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 86%
      Charlson6 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Within a generation or two, maybe gay marriages will be common throughout our 50 states if the attitudes of our younger population prevails.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Poulenc6 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        But, beavith, above, gay people have been "beaten over the head," often literally, just for being who they are for many, many years.

        Not to mention by incessant assertions of straightness, and with what straights "want to do."

        Ironic that some straight people can claim they don't want to hear anything more about or from gays when they think nothing of proclaiming their heterosexuality in a thousand ways. The mere assertion of having a girl- or boyfriend of the sex opposite one's own being one.

        So sorry that you--and your family, whom you've consulted on this matter, I'm sure--find the business of gay marriage de trop.

        But....

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        9 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 86%
        Poulenc6 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        What's your authority on that statement, stalemate? I mean, who's giving you your marching orders?

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        7 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 83%
        toph19736 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Why is it that the right consistently thinks that they can tell people how they can live? Why are they so intolerant of people that are different from them? If it's not hurting you then why bother? Do you not have anything better to do with your lives? I loathe how the right thinks they are the moral authority. Clearly that is not the case. I lose it when Republicans talk about Morals, when they would like to take away a womans freedom to choose (completely unamerican). Or as evidenced with this and the ignorant racist comments from the usual suspects.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        2 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          Poulenc6 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          You realize, libs, that in your "argument," above, you've just done what you accuse others of doing: stigmatized the opposite side.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            DaneL6 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            It doesn't matter what the people want. It matters what the courts think is best for you.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply

            1 Reply

            loading loading ...
          • 100%
            johnstontemple6 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Gays should be allowed to marry. How are they going to affect the heterosexuals. If a gay couple decides to get married, it doesn't affect my life in any way. I ask the people who are against it, why does it bother you and how do gay marriages affect your happiness. Homophobia shouldn't be tolerated just like racism. I know many gay couples who have been together much longer that married heterosexual couples. They should get the same legal benefits as the rest of us.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • 100%
              jordan116 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              The right to enter into legally recognized committments already exists. Equal rights means equal rights. You can't pass 'laws' to deny rights. You can only attempt to pass Constitutional ammendments. And should an ammendment be passed and ratified that denies one group the same right that others have, you can kiss our way of life bye bye.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              View All 77 Comments

              Add a Comment

              Sign In With Your Propeller Account

              Forgot your password?

              Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

              To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

              More News