Senior creditors: Chrysler deal violates 5th admendment »

Posted By k9kssr 7 months, 3 weeks ago in News

1 of 1

If the Obama administration expected the senior creditors of Chrysler to fold their tents under political pressure, they may have gotten a rude shock today.  Thomas Lauria, who accused the White House of threatening the creditors withn humiliation at the hands of the White House press corps, has filed a motion to halt the administration’ s machinations on behalf of the UAW in the Chrysler bankruptcy.  Lauria and his allies claim that the Obama administration has violated the Constitution in their bid to devalue the senior creditors’ holdings on behalf of junior creditors, and have some precedent to support the allegation.

Read Full Story at hotair.com »

240 Views Share Story 11 Comments Report

Submitted By:
k9kssr

Who Also Submitted: All »
Other Related Articles: All »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 11 (view all)
- Display
  • 78%
    Wolfie20077 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    There is no doubt that many of Obummer's actions have been unconstitutional. Finally some folks with the guts to stand up to the tyrant. I suppose this means Lauria and his clients are going to be ravaged by the White House press corp dogs. Sic um' Stephonopolis, you junk, yard dog, you!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 78%
      nostalgia7 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      FTA:
      The Supreme Court long ago recognized, however, that a secured creditor’s interest in specific property is protected in bankruptcy under the Fifth Amendment.

      Fifth Amendment:
      No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

      But gee whiz! What do you expect - it's only the constitution
      The far left doesn't have to rely on that antiquated document when it stands in their way

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 78%
        pc257 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Obama the constitutional scholar......LMAO

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 78%
          pc257 months, 3 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Chrysler Bankruptcy - Like a bad gangster movie

          http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039=co...

          Goldman Sachs Foreshadowed UAW’s Chrysler Coup: Kevin Hassett

          May 4 (Bloomberg) -- I feel like I have seen this bad gangster movie before.

          In the opening scene, a naive investor buys some bonds, explaining to his staff that they are a sound investment secured by hard assets. Even if the company goes under, the investor explains, bond investors stand to get about 80 percent of their money back.

          The next day, a government official calls and offers to buy up the bonds at 33 cents on the dollar, while giving controlling interest in the company to the labor unions. The investor refuses. That night, a man shows up at his home.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 80%
            k9kssr7 months, 3 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            I'm glad they are filing suit....I can't see why the auto makers are being treated so differently from how the bankers have been handled.....although I don't agree with the fact some of them are trying to pay back the bailout and the administration is refusing to take it. Definitely a double standard.

            US citizens have their rights violated, but Chevez and his ilk are fawned upon.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply

            1 Reply

            loading loading ...
          • 0%
            antibrainwasher7 months, 3 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            What a shock, the lockstepping circle whankers are barking and whining that some rich guy is losing money.

            You cons don't care about jobs, or the thousands of workers who would depend on welfare if their jobs disappeared, no you are, as usual, defending the rights of casino capatalist billionaires who would lose their gambling money.

            The one and only principle of the repugs: make the rich richer. And none of you blithering morons are rich, you're just mindless brainless dil-do heads, following your masters at faux noise, bending over for Saudi Oil Sheiks and Foreign national anti american billionaire moguls like your messaih Murdock and your Bloviating Pedophile savior, Oxy Limpballs, the leader of the party of cons.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply

            1 Reply

            loading loading ...
          • 100%
            Klarissa7 months, 3 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            The people who would be hurt if the union owned 45%, Obama owned 45%, and the stock and bond holders owned 10% would be the every-day investor who has his/her money in retirement funds that hold automobile stock.

            Of course, if the union owns as much as Obama, they will have to split the cost of the warranties.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply

            1 Reply

            loading loading ...
          • 100%
            ranchhasawhiteass7 months, 3 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Been a hearing stuff about the White House given out threats to the investors . Come to think about it Obama is beginning to get on my nerves. In the WH 100 days and spent 100million in that amount of time.
            I ain't gonna buy no more Chrysler products.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            View All 11 Comments

            Add a Comment

            Sign In With Your Propeller Account

            Forgot your password?

            Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

            To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.