Story Comments
Posted by: b-happy 7 months, 3 weeks ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-

b-happy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You a lib and you obviously don't get it. Michael Savage has never spoke violence and asked for people to be killed. Yet he is put on a list of people that have done such things. WHy?
Reply
Because he is a Conservative. THis is a an attack on free speech. ARen't the Liberals supposed to be the ones that are about Human Rights and being able to have Free Speech. This proves that what Liberals preach is a lie. Instead of supporting Savage, you Liberals support taking away free speech because he has a different point of view than you.
When ever you hear a Lib say they stand for human rights, just realize that they are talking about blacks, Mexicans and Gays. If you are a white Male Conservative then you should be banned from speaking, which is exactly what is happening to Savage.
Unfortunately for the Libs., Savage is probably one of the smartest people of our time and he will not let them get away with it. He is already suing the government of Britain.
What I don't understand is how the Liberals can agree with this ban and then stick up for someone like Bill Ayers who has actually tried to bomb people. Nobody said the Libs were smart but this one is so obvious that even they might have a clue.-

b-happy7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Oh ya and Obama just bombed a bunch of civilians in Afghanistan and not one Lib commented on that story in propeller. So not only do they want to ban free speech, they now stick up for Obama bombing civilians because he is not George Bush. WTF? You Libs. are so fing Hypocritical it's amazing.
Reply
Oh no, maybe I will be banned from Britain too because my views don't fit with theirs-

jakesguile7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Colltateral damage is ugly, no matter who the President is. I do not support the bombing of innocent civilians. If Collateral damage did occur, then something needs to be done about it.
Reply
But I won't call for impeachment for the simple reason that it was alright with you when Bush killed innocent civilians. You all said he needed full support and they weren't innocent at all.
-
-

jakesguile7 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
1. "Savage never advocated violence"
Reply
"Get AIDS and die" - Michael Savage
2. "liberals stick up for Bill Ayers"
Ummmm no... no we don't
3. "Already suing the government of Britain"
Oohhh booo hoo, a country I wasn't born in and do not live in kicked me out for hate speech I want to go there! The world belongs to the US waaaaaahh, they have no right to ban me I get to go wherever I please!~
-
People Who Liked This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment positively. Is it really that bad of a comment?
People Who Didn't Like This Comment (3)
Submit a Story
Advertisement

loading ...
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.