« Back to story "Red Cross Says "US Strike Kills Dozens Of Civilians""

Story Comments

Posted by: gamahuche 7 months, 2 weeks ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 100%
    gamahuche7 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    This sounds like the perfect way to lose hearts and minds for ever!
    When will they ever learn..

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    6 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 67%
      b-happy7 months, 2 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      THe Messiah Obama says : thou shall protest George Bush bombs but thou shall embrace the bombs of O Bomb A.

      O Bomb A Civilians.

      Where are all the protesters? You were here when Bush was president you weasels. Michael Savage was right again. A Bomb with a D on it is a good. A Republican Bomb is Baaaaaddddd.... We don't call you sheeple for nothing.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      4 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        sinophil497 months, 2 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        b-happy - Why didn't GW Bush finish the job when he sent our forces into Afghanistan in the first place? Remember Osama bin Laden was on the run, hiding for his life in caves. The al Qaida organization was decimated. Remember the playing cards with the top al Qaida leaders on the cards who were systematically being hunted down and eliminated?

        Why in the world did Bush suddenly stop the hunt and divert his attention to Iraq??

        Iraq had no connection to the 9/11 attack. Saddam despised Osama bin Laden and kept him at arm's length. Saddam had no WMD's. Osama bin Laden was and still is the most dangerous terrorist in the world, not Saddam Hussein.

        Now al Qaida has regrouped and replenished their command and their forces. The Taliban is reclaiming the countryside of Afghanistan and the government has little power outside of Kabul. The poppy harvest last year was a record and supplies funding for both al Qaida and the Taliban.

        What an idiot Bush was to abandon the hunt for OBL. Why didn't he "stay the course" in Afghanistan? Now we are seeing the consequences of his monumental error. Obama has no choice but to finish the job of killing OBL.

        I am not saying that killing civilians is to be brushed aside or covered up. I am saying that much of this accidental killing could have been avoided if Bush had killed OBL while he was holed up in the mountains AWAY FROM CIVILIANS.

        Back then, most of the civilian population, the villagers, had no love of the Taliban, their imposition of Sharia, and the presence of al Qaida. Now that the terrorists have intermingled with or are hiding among civilians, the casualty rate will go up and cause even more hatred against USA.

        I repeat. Bush made a monumental error in letting OBL live.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
      • 67%
        Endoscopy7 months, 2 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        How do you identify which are the targeted people and which are the civilians. They all dress the same. This is idiocy.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...

      Post Reply

      You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

      People Who Liked This Comment (3)

      People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

      No one voted this comment negatively.