Story Comments
Posted by: GWHayduke 7 months, 2 weeks ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
85%
GWHayduke7 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Sooo, you have one person from the Democratic party with knowledge of waterboarding, and its blowing up in their face?
Reply
Odd logic.
When you have a President, VP, Sec of State, Sec of Defense all authorizing and or approving of torturing people who may or may not be guilty of crimes and you want to point the finger at someone with 'knowledge" of the act and pretend that THIS is the crime?
Is this 15th century Spain?
Naw, just another pc25 article pulled from the depths of an extreme right wing blog.
BTW, I propped the story on its premise, but found the rationalization to be typical false partisan hackery.
Must have been a high school term paper that found its way to hotair.-
73%
beavith17 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
not at all.
Reply
amazingly, this is the same paint brush that painted Gingrich for being the homewrecking hypocrite that was stridently bloviating about Clinton and Lewinsky.
only its worse.
Pelosi gets caught bloviating about the same national securty issue that she had full knowledge of.
its called the paintbrush of hypocrisy. Gingrich was a social hypocrite. Pelosi is a national security hypocrite. in the great scheme of things, Pelosi should, at minimum, be fired.
if the witch hunt 'Truth Commission' actually DOES get formed, Pelosi gets to join the gang.-
90%
GWHayduke7 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I fully support the elimination of ANY legislative member who deliberately misleads the constituency.
Reply
But dunking Pelosi (or anyone else) into the water and claiming she is a witch because she can swim is ineffective.
Present the facts and do something about it.
Hotair.com is hardly, no, not even remotely an objective source of information - I'll take Fox News before some slanted blog, thanks.-
-
86%
mesodude7 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"this isn't about slanted reporting.
Reply
its those rarest of rare cases: it is what it is."
--What makes you think you have all the facts when classified documents are involved and we know the CIA's word is less than impeccable? Exactly... You *don't* have all the facts and when that's proven, you'll have one of your usual chickenhearted non responses. This is far from an open and shut case and you people really must be braindead if you think anything has been proven about Pelosi.
-
-
-
83%
mesodude7 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"amazingly, this is the same paint brush that painted Gingrich for being the homewrecking hypocrite that was stridently bloviating about Clinton and Lewinsky."
Reply
--Except, it *isn't* amazing because you don't have all the facts. You've only convinced yourself you do. This will end very badly for the GOP. It's going to be a major con cryfest. ;-0
-
-
80%
slate7 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Sooo, you have one person from the Democratic party with knowledge of waterboarding, and its blowing up in their face?
Reply
It's odd logic to think that there is anything in DC that only ONE person knows, I mean have you seen all the times the print media printed top secret things in the past?-
80%
mesodude7 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"It's odd logic to think that there is anything in DC that only ONE person knows, I mean have you seen all the times the print media printed top secret things in the past?"
Reply
--It's odd logic to pretend that the CIA couldn't possibly be wrong and that this administration has clean hands and didn't destroy the Justice Dept and "lose" millions of email messages and White House logs, slate. That's odd (and partisan) logic. -
-
-
-
-
67%
pc257 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
--Well, then it's settled...Oh wait...It's not. You're speculating. 100%.
Reply
why don't you speculat on why Obama wont declassify the documents as Cheney requested.........my speculation is wont look too good for the DEMS......according to Cheney there iss nothing in them that would compromise the security of the US...Obama already did that several weeks ago against the wishes of his own CIA director
-
-
-
-
loading ...
engineer
donald51
spkguy
Beau7890
mesodude
lvrofwolves
TheRealizer
bluetexasvalley
9critters
CactusAnnie
DaneL
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.