Radio host Savage seeks Clinton's help over ban »

Posted By Radiofreeeuropa 5 months, 3 weeks ago in News

In an unexpected twist, sharp-tongued, conservative talk show host Michael Savage, who in the past savaged Hillary Clinton as a "dangerous human being" and "fraudulent huckster," has asked her for help after being banned in Britain.

Read Full Story at sfgate.com »

795 Views Share Story 54 Comments Report

Submitted By:
Radiofreeeuropa

All progress comes from unreasonable people.
Rats live on no evil star!
Wasilla: All I saw...
Sorry, just palindroming around with terrorists.
Are you still ...

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 54 (view all)
- Display
  • 100%
    Radiofreeeuropa5 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    The irony is enormous.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 94%
    gamahuche5 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I've never, ever been exposed to any of these people - nor of course would I expose myself to them!
    But listening to the BBC World Service news the other night they played a brief clip and it was just lunatic raving.
    Something like Hunter Thompson on some VERY nasty drugs, perhaps.
    He doesn't have a prayer of getting into the UK.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    myfairlady5 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    The U.K. has been able to ban people who promote hatred, terrorist activities and serious violence since 2005.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    13 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    ADAGUY5 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I say hang the s.o.b. out to dry!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    Charlson5 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    "He vowed Thursday that his representatives will appeal to the White House if necessary to seek redress - and said he intends to file a lawsuit against Smith herself later this week, charging her with defamation of character."

    Ah, good luck with your White House appeal. lol. And how can he sue for defamation of character? He has no character to defame.

    But, be it as it may, I do not favor bans unless the individual or groups committed felonies and I do not favor censoring another's views because they are offensive.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    9 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    dandt16125 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Let the Ban continue.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    dunkirk5 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    "especially since it involves a violation of international treaties signed by both the United States and Britain, Thompson said."

    Based on the Neo's trck record with that I'd think he doesnt have a leg to stand on arguing that one. I guss tho Britain as decided it doesn;t want unsavory characters who do nothing but spread dissent in the country.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      StevieGee5 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      He has a right to free speech. When you exercise that right you need to think out the consequences of what you say BEFORE you say it. Any country can deny entrance to anybody for any or no reason. We deny entrance to thousands of Mexicans every year just because they're Mexican.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      antibrainwasher5 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      The British Home Office, in making the announcement last week banning the 16 individuals, said Savage's radio show constituted "engaging in unacceptable behavior by seeking to provoke others to serious criminal acts and fostering hatred which might lead to inter-community violence."

      Newmann said last week that "the U.K. has been able to ban people who promote hatred, terrorist activities and serious violence since 2005. During this time, 101 people have been excluded for unacceptable behavior, including animal rights extremists, right-to-life, homophobe and far-right extremists, as well as those who advocate hatred and violence in support of their religious beliefs."

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      jimsit5 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Keep the bastard banned. Banning him from the USA would suit me just fine. These radical right wing talk show hosts are nothing but meglo-maniacs. They don't care how much damage they do. All they care about it getting attention, kinda like 2 year olds.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Radiofreeeuropa5 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        The companies that give these hatemongerers platforms are more at fault than the idiots who actually preach such nonsense.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        2 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        tehranchik5 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        1. Can not stomach savage. The name fits him well.

        2. Banning and barring someone for their beliefs is not road anyone should travel. This will drive the wedge in deeper. Separate us further.

        3. This could be the HUGE dose of karma he's needed for a long time. Spewing vileness to the public will get you into trouble from time to time. Seems like MS's time is here and now.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          DarkWizard5 months, 3 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          I see the extreme right is getting the recognition they deserve!

          Good luck with that international lawsuit for defamation there Savage! Like most extremists, you're on the losing end of this one!

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            Georgia505 months, 3 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            There must be a rule in the UK: "No nation may do to another nation what we've done to Eire."

            Or is it "what we've done to India"?

            It's hard to keep British colonial abuses straight.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            View All 54 Comments

            Add a Comment

            Sign In With Your Propeller Account

            Forgot your password?

            Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

            To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

            More News