Who is most offended by calling Democrats SOCIALISTS? »
Posted By Goppy 6 months, 1 week ago in Political NewsPropeller heads, taking a cue from Messiah Rush Limabaugh, (and second in command Michael Steele) have taken to calling Democrats ... the "Democrat Socialist Party". ... . Can you guess who's most offended? ... ... ... The CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR lays it out!
Read Full Story at features.csmonitor.com »
1072 Views Share Story 154 Comments Report
Submitted By:
Ask me how Christian Conservatives reinvented Jesus!
It began in the 60's with a core group who fought hard AGAINST Civil Rights ... - and - AGAINST ...
Other Related Articles:
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentShowing 143 of 154 Comments (view all)
-

Goppy6 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
FTA ...
Reply
"With the Republican party reeling, some in the GOP think the answer to their problems could be pretty simple ..... formally rename the opposition ... the "Democratic Socialist Party" ... a strategy perhaps modeled after the very 'successful' effort to rename French fries, "Freedom fries".
LOL
. -

Goppy6 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
So who would you guess would be most offended?
Reply
Democrats?
NOPE! It's like someone jabbing you with a rubber spear ... and those doing the jabbing thinking they are hurting you.
The REAL group that is offended is .... drum roll please .... SOCIALISTS!
Socialists understand that Democrats are NOT Socialists by any stretch ... and they are OFFENDED that their Ideology is being 'besmirched' in this way.
Ah ... name calling reveals such an amazingly juvenile essence.
. -

fsev416 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Ah yes, the juvenile essence does shine through on issues such as this and what type of condiments the President prefers on his hamburgers. The bright side that I see is that as long as such issues surface we get closer and closer to mid-term elections with the Republican still looking for leadership and direction and having little chance of making any gains in the election.
Reply-

Goppy6 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
As a Centrist, I would like to feel confident that America will continue to turn their collective back to Right Wing Silliness.
Reply
But mankind has always, and will always respond to fear mongering. And NOBODY does fear mongering better than the Modern Republican party.
Plus, their domination of all Mainstream Media gives them plenty of opportunity to promote their fear.
. -
-
-

TimALoftis6 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I have noticed for a couple years now that increasingly the Republicans are referring to the Democratic Party as the 'Democrat Party'. While I am not a big fan of Chris Matthews, I am glad that this is one of his pet peeves and has made it a point to correct Republicans when they try to use the term on his show.
Reply-

bruhaha6 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I believe it's intended to imply democ - rat.
Reply
I remember hearing audio of this:
In March 2009, after Representative Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) repeatedly used the phrase "Democrat Party" when questioning U.S. Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag, Representative Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) said:
I’d like to begin by saying to my colleague from Texas that there isn’t a single member on this side of the aisle that belongs to the “Democrat Party.” We belong to the Democratic Party. So the party you were referring to doesn’t even exist. And I would just appreciate the courtesy when you’re referring to our party, if you’re referring to the Democratic Party, to refer to it as such.[32] -

simonsez6 months, 1 week ago
-
libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned12 Replies
-
beavis617bComment removed: Retracted by user1 Reply
-
-
LiliVonShtuppComment removed: Hard Banned
-

Commodore16 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Well democrats aren't going to understand it because of their arrogance. The democratic leaders want socialism and know what they're doing. The leadership also know their followers have a brain washed and drone-like mentality and are too blind to understand. Rush is right. Wake up liberals! Before it's too late.
Reply-
-

Goppy6 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Good one Commodore, I have another story concurrent to this one that is entirely pertinent to your pov!
Reply
http://www.propeller.com/story/2009/05/18/who-is-m...
. -
-
-
-

tadair9196 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day, America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened."
Reply
Norman Thomas (1884—1968) six-time presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America.-

Goppy6 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
What are you saying?
Reply
Are you saying that George W. Bush was a Socialist? Just because he proposed ... no ... DEMANDED that Congress pass his BAILOUT as quickly as possible and with as little oversight as possible?
Is THAT what you are saying?
Well, you COULD be right.
George W. Bush DOES have a history of dalliances with Socialism.
http://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=...
. -

NoWayMan6 months, 1 week ago
-
-

gamahuche6 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Viewed from across the great water it is quite embarrassing to see "sophisticated" people make such clowns of themselves.
Reply
I shudde at the political inanities of my fellow-countrymen who have only been free of Communism for 2 decades.
But from 1776 to now is one heck of a long time to barely reach political adolescence!
Democrat Party is simply wrong grammar chaps!
Democrat Socialist simply compounds the stupidity..
All references in English should use the expression Democratic Socialist - to define the difference from Communism, aka as Socialism when its used in the context of a country which was a member of the Communist bloc. -

tadair9196 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
the reason the left rejects that title is because it has such a negative stigma attached to it.
Reply
like, if somebody said i was "ignorant" on the subject of astronomy. well, that's true. i don't know a darn thing about astronomy. but, i might get offended if somebody called me that, even though it was merely a statement of fact.
another reason is that many on the left simply do not know what socialism means. they think it is an attack word, or some arbitrary statement. socialism is when you take money from somebody, and give it to somebody else. this country already has tons of socialistic programs. schools, post office, etc, etc. fundamentally, it's an altruistic theft. and many people think it is appropriate to take money from people in the name of schooling, or medical care, or what not. but that's socialism. so, we should start coming clean with our thoughts.
the last reason, is that the left has noticed that obama isn't doing anything much differently than bush. so, how did bush avoid this title? the bankster bailouts that bush and cheney passed on their way is precisely what geithner is doing today. geithner is an ex-kissinger aide, by the way. they worked together for 3 years. so, things are going exactly to plan here, folks. -
-
-

Goppy6 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I would LOVE to ... NOT say that.
Reply
But Klarissa ... it's the Modern Republicans THEMSELVES that are shoving their Doctrinaire Movement down America's throats.
Why do you point your finger at me?
I'm as outraged as you are at the Modern Republicans audacious attempts to narrow what they stand for ... and their aggressive attempts to destroy all who disagree with them.
I would suggest that you direct your suggestions at Rush Limbaugh, FOX, SBC, and the hundreds of Right Wing Media outlets who persist in positioning the Republicans as uniquely DIFFERENT from Traditional Republicans.
If you are who you say you are, a woman of a certain age, then you KNOW that the Modern Republican Party bears little resemblance to the Republican Party of Barry Goldwater.
They THEMSELVES want to be known for their narrowed beliefs.
.
-
-
-

Icantwait6 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
My Fellow Americans: Goppy just goes on and on with his lame rants. The World Loves Rush Limbaugh more than the Country Loves Obama. Rush tells the truth, Obama does not know what the truth is and don't care. Rush respects human life. Obama wants you to kill your babies. He wants you to abort their life even after they are officially born. By a needle to their head or by pulling their brains out through their nostrils. I just call the Democrats, Damocrats which is more appropriate since they are not intelligent enough to be Socialist. Rush wants people to become rich and enjoy life. Obama wants everyone to stay the same. He don't care what your goals or capabilities are he just wants you to work and give to those that do not work. Rush thinks this is the Greatest County on Earth. Obama doesn't even like it enough to say a good word about it. Yet, Goppy dislikes Rush and likes Obama. That tells you what type of person he really is and to me that is Anti American. Yes, Rush is a True American, Obama a True Kenyan. So, who should we really listen too? Me The Real American
Reply-

Goppy6 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Thanks for your contribution to my story.
Reply
It does more to validate my point than anything I could proffer.
To all rational readers ... I give you ... icantwait ... this is the kind of person that is attracted to the Modern Republican Party.
. -

Dave596 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The first thing you are incorrect about is Limbaugh. There is a whole lot of the world that has no idea who Rush Limbaugh is. I can state that as fact since I have many friends in the UK and Italy. The simple fact is the world at large does not care about Rush Limbaugh.
Reply
"Obama wants you to kill your babies. He wants you to abort their life even after they are officially born." That is direct quote from your post. I would like you to prove that. If you can not show direct evidence then it is obviously an out right fabrication. If you would like clarification of that It is my considered opinion that you lie. That is the second and probably worst thing about your post.
As for the rest the of screaming semi intelligible rant well you just make no sense at all. As for listening to you I fear this nation would be in much more trouble than we have if we did that.
My last thought is that you should probably seek professional anger management guidance.
-
-
-

Dave596 months, 1 week ago
-

Dave596 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
On a more serious note. The fact that we band together to have a government makes us socialist. That would be a basic definition.
Reply
The fact that we have highways, stop signs and traffic signals means we have socialized enough to pay for something for the common good. The fact we have fire fighters and police departments means we are socialist enough to want protection from burning to death or being mugged. Oh yeah and the water department. It may be privately held but is regulated by the Government so we don't get sick from our drinking water. All of these functions are by definition socialist. I want to know just what in our society is not social? People band together for the good of all. That is what Government is. Anyone who benefits from driving on public highways,walking on public side walks under streetlights payed for by public funds is being a socialist. If one does not want to pay taxes and be a "socialist" then I suggest they may never drive on a highway, use a side walk, or any other public facility ever. This would include, social security, calling the police or fire department or going to a park or even a public drinking fountain.No more 911 for emergency. You pay nothing you get nothing. So to anyone one who has used any of the fore mentioned things then you are just as much of a socialist as I am.-

Georgia506 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
We do not "band together to have a government." At least that was not the intention of the founding forefathers. Their dream, their experiment, their hope was that the federal government of the United States would derive its just power from the consent of the governed.
Reply
Taxing people after they die and before they're born...well...let's just say such a spectacle never even occurred to King George and his Parliament, and no such spectacle was included in the "taxation without representation" indictment by the Colonies. We owe the English Crown an apology.
-
-
-
-
HMMaceComment removed: Spammer, Hard Banned
-

Goppy6 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The only problem I have with your post is this line ... "All Democrats are no more Socialist than all Republicans are Neocons."
Reply
While it's true that NO Democrat is a Socialist ... SOME Republicans ARE Neo-Cons ... and proud of that label - given that many have actually signed their 'manifesto'.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinc...
.
-
-
SoSoJoeComment removed: Hard Banned
-

Icantwait6 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
My Fellow Anti American: So, Goppy, you are a Centrist. Middle of the road kind of person. Yet, you take the side of Obama who is so far left they call him lefty. Middle of the road person are you? Yet, you can't understand why real Conservatives find your Love, Obama, a Commy. Yes, when you don't have an honest opinion of right and wrong I guess Centrists is the place to be. Not enough courage to take a side that is Patriotic but would prefer to pretend to be Socialist. Yeh, and you know people in the UK, and Hollywood, and the Kremlin and yet you spend your long dreary days behind your keyboard. Well, Mr Centrist keep defending your middle of the road vierpoint no one really cares or are impressed. Just say anything you want because after all no one will argue with you because there are no arguments for the Middle Of The Road. By the way are you on a solid yellow line or a yellow broken one. Doesn't matter it is still yellow. The Real American
Reply
More News
Politics Daily
The Young Americans the United States Is Sending to War
Will Sarah Palin Ever Be President? A Guide to the Predictions
Obama Faces Pushback From His Own Party on More Troops for Afghanistan
Police Spying On Protesters Stirs Outrage in Britain
Melinda Henneberger on 'Hardball': Obama's Afghanistan Announcement
Submit a Story
Advertisement

Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.