1 in 7 Freed Detainees Rejoins Fight, Report Finds »

Posted By gamahuche 6 months, 1 week ago in News

An unreleased Pentagon report concludes that about one in seven of the 534 prisoners already transferred abroad from the detention center in Guantánamo Bay , Cuba, has returned to terrorism or militant activity, according to administration officials.
The conclusion could strengthen the arguments of critics who have warned against the transfer or release of any more detainees as part of President Obama’s plan to shut down the prison by January. Past Pentagon reports on Guantánamo recidivism have been met with skepticism from civil liberties groups and criticized for their lack of detail.

The Pentagon promised in January that the latest report would be released soon, but Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman, said this week that the findings were still “under review.”

Two administration officials who spoke on condition of anonymity said the report was being held up by Defense Department employees fearful of upsetting the White House, at a time when even Congressional Democrats have begun to show misgivings over Mr. Obama’s plan to close Guantánamo.

At the White House on Wednesday, Mr. Obama ran into a different kind of resistance when he met with human rights advocates who told him they would oppose any plan that would hold terrorism suspects without charges.

The White House has said Mr. Obama will provide further details about his plans for Guantánamo detainees in a speech Thursday.

Read Full Story at nytimes.com »

991 Views Share Story 98 Comments Report

Submitted By:
gamahuche

"I would rather be a square peg than fit in a pigeon hole" -
an essay which won me the "Lamb Essay Prize" at the Religious ...

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 98 (view all)
- Display
  • 96%
    gamahuche6 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Was this ever going to be easy? How can justice be done when it seems to be impossible to sort out the sheep from the goats? Are some of the people in Guantanamo guilty parties - undoubtedly; are the majority - probably not.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    gamahuche6 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Its rather important to read to the end of the story - the 1 in 7 claim has shrunk to this:

    "In addition to Mr. Shihri and Mr. Rasoul, at least three others among the 29 named have engaged in verifiable terrorist activity or have threatened terrorist acts."

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    21 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    CrusaderRabbit6 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    It was never going to be 'easy' to sort out this mess. The first problem is no one properly investigated claims of terrorist activities before the arrests. The M.O. was to grab anyone remotely suspect. Then sort them out later. The problem with that is that witnesses/informants get killed or displaced during all-out war. You end up with a big ******* contest. When frustration sets in then you begin to look for ways to extract information. So now no matter how many true terrorists there are we are the bad guys because of our methods.
    We will probably never know how many were truly guilty when they were captured. We can be certain that we haven't made any friends and most likely assisted in creating many more terrorists than we ever imagined.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    15 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 93%
    Jaydee406 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    You reap what you sow. After the cold war was over the US military wanted, sorry, that should be needed an enemy to justify the large amounts of money it costs to run them so they lied about the situation in the middle east. Now their just being made into honest people by their own actions.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    Progressive6 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    "unreleased" is another way of saying "leaked" report--I found it interesting that this report hit the press right before the vote to deny closing Gitmo.

    It's my understanding that one of the three recidivist terrorists did nothing more threatening than an interview in a documentary film.

    It seems the 1 in 7 rate is not much worse than the recidivism rate of the penal system within our borders in general.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      jimdoze6 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Of the 534 transferred abroad, how many remain in custody?

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      tchef6 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      This is just another huge mess caused by the Bush administration. It's going to be next to impossible to sort out.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      Spadecaller6 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Since the Bush "government" suspended Habeas Corpus for alleged terrorists, paid bounty hunters to turn in those "suspected" of terrorism and then after years of confinement in concentration camps without fair trials, challenging the safety of their release because it may yield a percentage of repeat offenders is a twist of ethical standards that is barbaric and unjust.

      I would be more surprised if those who were innocent were released after years of imprisonment would not come out hating our government for the gross miscarriage of justice that was inflicted upon them.

      The Bush administration's reign of terror broke the most fundamental laws, which date back to the Magna Carta written in 1215.

      The one question that no one really wants to address that needs to be addressed is: were legal means used to detain these prisoners. If many of them were "rounded up" as the records indicate and that their guilt was paid for through bounties, Bush and his legal "experts" are guilty of crimes for imprisonment without due cause.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      Charlson6 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      As with most of the reports about the prisoners released by our government, prior reports had conflicting statistics, confirmation of facts were for the most part non existent, unable to list the names of those released and no program to track the ones released. I just don't believe in the veracity of this leak or any subsequent report unless it can be collaborated and confirmed (which I doubt they can produce).

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        jordan116 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I have to ask; if they were released, does that mean there was no evidence of their involvement in terrorist activity in the first place? Hard to believe they were released if there were. And if there were, why were they released? So next comes the question; if they weren't, and then engaged in terrorist activity after release, why? The way they were treated while incarcerated, perhaps?

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        18 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        tehranchik6 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        1. How many of these men were 'extraordinary renditioned'? Picked up on the word of an informant?

        2. How many lies has the pentagon told over the past several years? This report does come from the pentagon.

        3. Names can't be revealed due to national security?????? give me break

        4. The slight of hand 'rejoined'. Most of these men had no charges pending. We held them because we could. Many of the men were never on the battle field. So 'rejoin' is incorrect. It's purpose is to keep you believing the guilt of the released. Why would we release guilty terrorists?

        5. If I had been 'extraordinarily renditioned' AND tortured AND held without charge for several years without charges, I might, just might, be looking for a group to fight with.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          frctm56 months, 1 week ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          this means 6 in 7 are not dangerous despite being unlawfully detained.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 100%
            frctm56 months, 1 week ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            This debate strikes me as a propaganda coup for Al Qaeda. Americans are so afraid of 200 unarmed men that we can't trust our maximum security system to hold them or our legal system to process them.

            I guess Al Qaeda has successfully transformed the land of the brave into the land of the crippled by fear. If anything, I would think that these detainees would have more to fear from their fellow inmates in our maximum security prisons than the guards at Gitmo.

            But no. Lets keep broadcasting everyday to Al Qaida how afraid we are of them. Lets remind them of how successful they have been in destroying our values and altering our culture. Let's walk down the Neocon path of fear that is disguised as toughness but promoted by aging draft dodgers who refuse to fight the war on terror with anything other than words but have no qualms about sending others to die for this and enriching themselves in the process.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply

            2 Replies

            loading loading ...
          • 100%
            Markdistinction6 months, 1 week ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            We need to stop trying to turn "terrorists" into super villains. Each year, in this country, we release thousands of common criminals who have served their terms or accused criminals where there is not enough evidence to convict. A high percentage of these return to crime. That does not mean that all prison sentences need to be for life or that we should suspend the rules of evidence and start convicting all who are accused.

            Yes the crimes of terrorists have the potential to be very serious, but they are still crimes. We must follow the rules of law. If they are accused criminals then we must put them on trial. If they are prisoners of war we must follow the Geneva Convention. We cannot make up a new category. We kept prisoners of war in this country during W.W.II. There is, in this case, a problem in knowing when the war is actually over, but remember it was the Bush Administration that called it a war. If we had kept it as the actions or a bunch of really bad organized criminals then the rules would be clear. (1). The really bad ones get convicted and sentenced to life in prison. Our prison guards and police are well-equipped to guard them and it is an insult to them to suggest otherwise. (2). The lesser criminals serve their time and are released, mostly deported to their home countries. Perhaps if we treated them fairly, they will not return to criminal activities. If they do, we arrest and try them again. (3) Those we do not convict we release into their home countries (4) Some we can release after persuading them to become informants or spies to bring us the information we need to prevent future terrorists acts.

            If we are fighting a war, it is not against the terrorists. We fought a war against Iraq that had nothing to do with 9-11. We are fighting a war against the Taliban who are extremists who supported the 9-11 terrorists, but did not themselves engage in terror in this country. El Quida are the criminals, not an opposition army. They wear no uniforms, have no real national loyalty, pervert their own religion, have a very loose organizational structure and want to do really bad things for a cause they have trouble defining. Sounds a bit like our own Mafia.

            We can handle the terrorists through our laws. Right now some in this country are using them as a weapon--a weapon of fear to support their own perverted causes. This has to stop

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply

            1 Reply

            loading loading ...
          • 100%
            mrlecher6 months, 1 week ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Wasn't this the same organization that stated that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction? And that Saddam was working with Al Qaeda and was involved in 911?

            Did they finish their report with "And this time, we are telling the truth! Honest Injun"

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply

            1 Reply

            loading loading ...
          • 80%
            tadair9196 months, 1 week ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            this headline should read

            "Pentagon Sells More Propaganda: Masses Remain Convinced that Trial is Actually a Bad Thing, Bill of Rights a Bad Thing."

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply

            5 Replies

            loading loading ...
          • 100%
            dxxy4u6 months, 1 week ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            This doesn't mean (s)hit. If Iran held you and treated you like we treated the detainees, then freed you, what would you do toward Iran? Give them Roses? Like Omaba said, we have created a mess there that will be with us for a long time. Obama is trying to use what option he has to try and bring this to an end. There is no good way. Only a BAD or WORST way.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • 100%
              FrankHummel6 months, 1 week ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              I'm sorry --- why on Earth would anyone find that even remarkable (much less outrageous)?? If YOU had been subjected to the torture / dehumanization tactics evidently experienced by many of these "detainees" at the hands of "our" marvelous people-dominators, would not YOU do LIKEWISE? And if NOT, then WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU??

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              • 100%
                mark-stevens6 months, 1 week ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                14%?? They must be doing something right, or really bad. 80% of all U.S prisoners become repeat offenders. That 14% could be
                lesson learned" or they were innocent to begin with!!!

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
                • Neutral
                  getreal16 months, 1 week ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  They know more about torture than we do. When you look back in History the middle east, had it going.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                  Reply
                  loading loading ...
                  View All 98 Comments

                  Add a Comment

                  Sign In With Your Propeller Account

                  Forgot your password?

                  Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

                  To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

                  More News