« Back to story "Gore Vidal on Why Ayn Rand Sucks and Literary Criticism - Esquire"

Story Comments

Posted by: alakazam 7 months, 1 week ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 100%
    alakazam7 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    She was essentially the creator of a form of quasi-nihilism who believed men could achieve a self realized godhead.

    The problem is that the path she presented was essentially amoral. She believed in stomping on the faces of an imaginary "lesser man" to reach the top of the pile.

    A lot of her work isn't fiction and smacks of pure totalitarianism. She tried to "pretty it up" with the term "objectivism" .

    She presented the idea that there were "Supernormals" who were the rightful masters of civilization...that all the good things that free men should expect proceed not from natural right but from the benevolence of Masters properly served. It's a slavers dream. Particularly since all her "supernormals" don't have a scrap of ethics and could care less if the world burns if they aren't getting their every whim of control and scrap of cash out of the deal.

    In some places she is worshiped like a god.

    http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=in...

    It's really pleasant on the surface but the depths plumb into pure darkness.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      Radiofreeeuropa7 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      That about sums it up !

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Natureboy7 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        "She presented the idea that there were "Supernormals" who were the rightful masters of civilization...that all the good things that free men should expect proceed not from natural right but from the benevolence of Masters properly served. It's a slavers dream. Particularly since all her "supernormals" don't have a scrap of ethics and could care less if the world burns if they aren't getting their every whim of control and scrap of cash out of the deal."

        Much like the neoconservative philosophy of Leo Strauss.

        In both cases, merely sociopathology remade as a virtue.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...

      Post Reply

      You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

      People Who Liked This Comment (4)

      People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

      No one voted this comment negatively.