« Back to story "Illinois civil union bill advances | News Story on 365gay.com"

Comments for Illinois civil union bill advances | News Story on 365gay.com »

Posted By david_nwpa 7 months, 1 week ago in Political News

(Springfield, Illinois) A bill giving gay couples the right to form civil unions in Illinois is moving closer to a vote on the House floor, but time is running out.

Read Full Story at 365gay.com »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 8
- Display
  • 100%
    david_nwpa7 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Civil unions will not advance this year in Illinois. The legislative strategy there is just not strong enough yet to get this issue passed. In like manner, it does not seem likely that the cons will get enough votes to ban same-sex marriage. What bothers me most is that this issue should not be open to the voters. What if the existence of the Republican party were put to a vote? Would they be banned based on their minority status?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      mcgrievysr7 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      david_nwpa---- "What bothers me most is that this issue should not be open to the voters"

      Good point. I agree.

      "What if the existence of the Republican party were put to a vote? Would they be banned based on their minority status?"

      How can we get this on the ballot? :-)

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        dandt16127 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I completely agree. This should NOT be up to the voters.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          mcgrievysr7 months, 1 week ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          dandt1612----Hey, T, good to see you.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
    • 100%
      lvrofwolves7 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I've always said this issue shouldn't even be up for a vote.
      It is so blatantly unconstitutional, I don't understand why there are those who can't see that, it's downright unAmerican.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        wtagg7 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        It is an instance of where the church is too far entwined into our governmental processes. Marriage is a secular civil agreement between two people. If the church doesn't want to recognize or denigrate a marriage between two individuals, for whatever reasons, that is their business, but they have no business in preventing an agreement between two individuals.

        It is a slippery slope to other areas that the church can determine in the secular civil world. Who is allowed to have children, whether one can be buried or cremated, etc..........

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          lvrofwolves7 months, 1 week ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          if this shows up twice...sorry

          I agree and I'd be ok if every church in the USA didn't want to hold a wedding for homosexuals, I mean it would be sad, but their choice. All religion is choice, and everyone is entitled to that.
          But our laws and rights are not a choice and to have our own government deny any group legal agreement which a marriage is when it comes right down to it, it's just wrong to deny it.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        Boris20094 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Democracy. The people have the right to do everything, including unisex marriage. I not against it.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply
        loading loading ...

        Add a Comment

        Sign In With Your Propeller Account

        Forgot your password?

        Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

        To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.