Story Comments

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

On Limbaugh's biography on Wikipedia, not only was he a college dropout, his own mother admitted he flunked "everything," including ballroom dancing.

Come on all you cons, Limbaugh doesn't have the intellectual capacity to debate a kindergartner. He has the gall to question an intellectual powerhouse like Sotomayor.

Rush is an entertainer. He says things to entertain people. He doesn't say things to enlighten people or to give moral guidance to the country. He is not a philosopher, he is not a teacher, he is not a moralist, he is not an ethicist. He is not even a politician.

How in the world did the Republican party grant him so much power to lead and influence the entire partY?

Arianna Huffington, Keith Olbermann, and Michael Moore may say and write things that I agree with and are entertaining, but I do not let them guide my own thinking and philosophy. They do not guide the Democratic Party. If one of them were to run for office, like Al Franken, then I would have to decide if the entertainer or commentator is worthy of my vote and support and worthy to be a leader.

1 Reply