« Back to story "Church of Scientology Banned from Editing Wikipedia"

Comments for Church of Scientology Banned from Editing Wikipedia »

Posted By TechnologyExpert 7 months ago in Science & Technology

Wikipedia has decided enough is enough. After too many self-serving edits by the Church of Scientology, Wikipedia has decided to ban edits from IP addresses owned or operated by the Church of Scientology and its associates.

Read Full Story at technologyexpert.blogspot.com »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 6
- Display
  • 100%
    tadair9196 months, 4 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    holy cow, that's funny.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      calitennflo6 months, 4 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Here again, not but voicing my opinion...as I am totally for wikipedia, yet I would have nbanned the individuals and not the Church itself.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        aceofspades16 months, 4 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        A church founded on a science fiction book, well guess it's not too different from one based on a fairy tale

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          cleare6 months, 4 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          i don't think it's funny. scientology is a dangerous cult and i don't want them messing around with my wikis.

          i'm also concerned about the allegation in the article that the organization is trying to sanitize it's image all over the web and they have the resources to do it.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply

          1 Reply

          loading loading ...
          • 100%
            chuck-the-canuck6 months, 4 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            They can try all the sanitation they want. A disinfected turd is still a turd.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
          • 100%
            earthlingerer6 months, 4 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            "pwned"

            It's not just that they identified and stopped the perpetrators, but also that they made it into a public service announcement letting everybody in the world know how this organization operates, and that toleration is the first bad step that anyone can make when dealing with "nuts" like these.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
            Reply
            loading loading ...

            Add a Comment

            Sign In With Your Propeller Account

            Forgot your password?

            Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

            To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.