My dear American neighbours »
Posted By greenmac 5 months, 1 week ago in Health & FitnessThis is an interesting comparison. On the issue of wait times....it depends on geography and what the issue is. Personally I have no problem waiting a few weeks for a check up and I have never had a wait time for anything of a serious nature. Not having the thoughts of high medical costs far out weighs any wait time I may encounter. In the US I understand wait times are also an issue based on geography and medical bankruptcies are common.
Read Full Story at cbc.ca »
491 Views Share Story 30 Comments Report
Submitted By:
Ok..Ok....This is where I say something great about myself.....hmmmm. I like daylight and night time as well. How am I doing so ...
Who Also Submitted:
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 30 (view all)
-

greenmac5 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I am quoting one of the responses from this article....I believe it sums it up for me.
Reply
"Having been given superlative service during my treatment of cancer, I can only say that had the added stress of worrying about paying for it all been dumped on me at the same time that I was struggling to survive this hideous disease, it would have been quite unbearable. That is one huge difference with our systems and a very big one. Worry and stress do not help one get better. Plus, with a health care system in place with access for all, I believe I read that countries with these systems tend to have check-ups more frequently, thereby catching potentially dangerous diseases much earlier meaning more successful outcomes becuase of much earlier treatment." -

Charlson5 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"If you have money or gold-plated coverage, you're probably better off here the way things are now."
Reply
"If you can't afford insurance or you're a working stiff struggling to pay your premiums, you're probably better off in Canada."
That, my friends, is what's wrong with the American health care system. The rich benefits from it and the poor and middle class suffers. No equity nor empathy for those who can't afford health care or it's insurance.-

BB645 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I'm confused by this article. In Canada there is no private health care insurance. It's against the law.
Reply
As to bills from your health care, if you have a PPO or HMO, you won't see them either. I think if the USA creates a national health care system, we the employers should be able to offer our own health care and permit our people to opt out. Many of our key people have come from nations with national health and they're not big on it. They prefer selecting their own doctors and going to their own centers of excellence.
If you want private insurance you should be able to buy it. If you want national health, you should buy it. Let the consumer make the choice. Oh, that's the problem you don't want to pay for your own health care, you want someone else to. As a taxpayer, you're going to pay for it. Either to a company or the government. Nothing is ever free.
-
-

Beau78905 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This seems a fair look at the Canadian healthcare system. But it can't be compared to anything likely to come of American healthcare reform--no one here who's actually in a position to implement reform is asking for a single-payer system like Canada's.
Reply -

lvrofwolves5 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
My best friend and I were just talking about this a few hours ago, if she or my Son (both have no insurance) got something like cancer, they would get care, AFTER, no pretesting no screening, most likely no biopsies etc...just wait till you need to go to ER because you are sick as hell, take off work, no pay that day etc...and some can't even go then because they can't afford to miss work, can't afford even 1 Dr visit.
Reply
her Mom was complaining about national health care, she doesn't want it, but then on the other hand she was bitching about having to pay almost 300.00 of the 10,000 her recent, screening, testing, biopsy and ex rays cost, and 300.00 was her co pay.
Some will bitch regardless I guess. -

chuck-the-canuck5 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
No system is perfect, but I wouldn’t trade our system for any system on earth.
Reply
I suffered a heart attack a couple of month ago and received the best of care. Not only have I fully recovered, but my family and I have not been left bankrupt trying to pay the bills.-
-

Dionys5 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"No system is perfect, but I wouldn’t trade our system for any system on earth."
Reply
I hear you. I have a friend here in the US who was a dual citizen US/Canada. He had to have bypass surgery and had what is considered good health coverage here in the US. That said he would have had to wait 2 years, possibly dying in the process of waiting, in the US and ended up paying more than 45k (at first glance, likely more) -- leaving his family in debt. He decided to go the Canada route, got scheduled in under 6 months and wasn't left with any bills other than travel to Canada. He decided to stay after he realized just how 'unamazing' America is compared to how it sells itself in the world.
-
-

wtagg5 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Here is a personal story about care here in the States.
Reply
My father was going through radiation treatment for lung cancer at a significant hospital in Cleveland Ohio. Let's call it the most significant hospital in Cleveland. Heck one of the most significant in the country, if not the world. Anyway, they burned his back with radiation. Third degree. This necessitated that they treat the burn with 200 dollar treated pads twice a day. They attempted to charge my mother for this treatment. She got the first bill after his death, partially caused by the radiation. 21 days, twice a day, times $200.
After arguing with them for almost a week, they decided that it would be best to remove those charges, but without providing a reason or rationale for removing them. My guess is to provide plausible deniability in any potential lawsuit.
When we mentioned this to the primary care doctor on the last day of his life, she said that was impossible, that the hospital would never do such a thing. She was removed (reassigned) from his care that same afternoon.
There is such that can be improved in our current system. Not sure if a government health care is the answer, but health care insurers and providers do not want the ability to over or double charge taken away from them. The least we need to do is simplify the process so that all the accounting smoke and mirror tricks can be reduced or eliminated. Unfortunately, this is not a strong area for the US government historically.-

BB645 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
My cousin lives in Calgary, Alberta Canada. In 1994 she was diagnosed with Acute Arteriosclerosis. She was told in no uncertain terms, bypass surgery was required ASAP. Since she wasn't experiencing any pain, she was told to go home and they would set up her surgery. When her primary called, she was told the next spot available would be in around 3-4 weeks and that she should consider "other" options. Being a person of means, she booked medical transport to Mayo and had the surgery done in 3 days. She paid for it entirely by herself. By the way it was a quadruple bypass procedure.
Reply
The good news, she's doing very well. The better news, she's formed a company that does this for others. They make the transport arrangements and assist in finding the best centers for treatment. Again, this is for people who can afford the treatment. It's usually cash up front. But in a nation that rations care and banned competition, it's a very viable option. I support our current system and am very much against a national health plan.
-
-

Eagle_Eye5 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Any thing would be better than what is here in America, the current government care "Medicaid, Medicare" really sucks...and millions suffer from it....most people don't realize that to the government you are just a number and expendable, your not important and you don't matter unless you have a lot of money.
Reply
My families experience with insurance versus no insurance is sad, my brother who lost his job was in severe pain and admitted to the hospital.....I'll give names of these Health Care givers so you know what to expect.....Orlando Regional.. and after a CAT scan there was a spot on his Pancreas. Because he had no insurance the hospital discharged him after 5 days even though he was in severe pain. I suggested he come up to Shands ER since he was in such horrible pain and they referred him to one of their top Pancreatic Doctors who then denied seeing him because he was out of service area...again more valuable time lost.....I told him not to go back to Orlando Regional but go to Florida Hospital because they were run by the Seven Day Adventists, not government, and are more interested in saving lives and care giving than money. Bingo, he was admitted, they did more tests and he has Pancreatic cancer which has spread. Had he gotten help the first time it wouldn't of spread and he wouldn't be where he is right now, fighting for his life.
Then there is myself....I thought since I was near Shands and established as a patient we could drop me from my husbands which costs us $350. per month and I could go back to Medicaid. Well to make a long story short Medicaid denied the surgery I need to fix my slipped disks in my neck so now I have to wait till January when I can get back on to my husbands to have the artificial disk replacement for my neck. This time though I will go to a "Private" Neurologist for the surgery, Shands will not make one cent on me for what they have done. When I had hubby's pricey insurance I saw the top Doctors, the "Professors" of medicine, now I get the low man on the totem pole flunkies.
Every American should have the right to good health care, not just those who can afford pricey insurance. If we had good preventive care then there would be a difference in our Health Care system, but as long as the all mighty dollar rules Medicine the wealthy get wonderful care and the poor get nothing unless they are diagnosed with a fatal illness.....
Then there is the Pharmaceutical companies, that is a whole other rant but it is pretty much the same, the all mighty dollar.
/end of medical rant, whew, I feel better now, thanks greenmac!!-

Endoscopy5 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Well Obama wants to give everybody the dumbed down Medicare/Medicaid type of health care. It is what Daschle wrote in his book and what the Democrats are using as a template for health care. Cost effective and safe instead of effective and safe. That extra word means that the older you get the less cost effective a procedure is. Also if one procedure is cheaper than another you must use the cheaper one even if it is not good enough. If the procedure is too costly you do not get it even though it will save your life.
Reply
-
-

thesatyr015 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Funny,not a single one of my friends in Vancouver have anything good to say about Canadian health care. They only use Canadian health care for minor things. When they have something more serious they go down to Washington State for medical care.
Reply -
Submit a Story
Advertisement

Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.