Scientists Discover Alternative Way to Make Plastic »

Posted By IsraGeek 6 months, 1 week ago in Science & Technology

Scientists at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory have discovered a way to transform plant cellulose into plastic in a single step. Although the process is expensive, it offers a better alternative to the current process which involves oil.

Read Full Story at inhabitat.com »

431 Views Share Story 7 Comments Report

Submitted By:
IsraGeek

I am a thirty-something (on the low end of the thirties) "hi tech" professional from Tel Aviv, Israel. Although I am in the twilight of ...

Other Related Articles: All »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 7 (view all)
- Display
  • 100%
    Mikunited6 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    It would be wonderful if this worked on a commercial basis.Our reliance on oil for fuel and plastics is the single most destructive force human kind has unleashed on the environment.It is obvious anyway,that as oil becomes more scarce, over the next 2 or 3 decades,replacements need to be found.This process sounds most promising---Thanks for the share

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      Jeboba6 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I'm all for that! ANYTHING to reduce the need to buy oil from radical buttheads from the middle east! We could drill a million new wells offshore, in Alaska, etc. and it wouldn't make a dent in the supply. But THIS! Hot damn!

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        calitennflo6 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I still like glass...and I like paper...both together works to...plastic is good in beams or furniture...sounds like good news.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          CHAM6 months, 1 week ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Jeboba. Those Radical Buttheads in the middle east actually own the oil, don't you think?

          But as to the amount of oil available to the United States, the Bakken Field in the Dakotas and the Green River Field in Colorado and surrounding states has an estimated reserve of 2.5 Trillion barrels. At our use of 20 million barrels per day, those 2.5 Trillion barrels, if all could be recovered, would last the U S for the next 342 years at the curent rate of usage.

          Course in this time of poor economy, Royal Dutch Shell (doesn't sound like an American Company to me ) has the rights to develop most of Green River.

          And that doesn't count the coal reserves that could fuel us at our present rate for upwards of a thousand years. Then there's Solar, GeoThermal, Wind, etc. etc.

          But I am glad they found a better way to make plastic - without oil.

          And it would be nice if American Companies, or even better yet, the American people were given title to the reserves.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply

          1 Reply

          loading loading ...
        • 100%
          CHAM6 months, 1 week ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Pokydoke. What you say is correct. But it doesn't mean it can't be done. And what irks me the most is who gets the license to do the extraction.

          It reminds me of the time during Nixon when $20 Billion was taken from the American taxpayer to develop a Coal Slurry that would stay in suspension in tank farms and could be piped.

          The problem was that in the early 30's some American Companies developed this very technology and placed it into service in south Africa in 1934.

          A homogenized slurry was refined with de-sulfurization here in the U S after Nixon's $20 Billion disappeared with nothing to show for it. The company I worked for put de-sulfured "Clean Coal" on the market in the 80's.

          Do you hear the howl now that there is no such thing as clean coal?

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          View All 7 Comments

          Add a Comment

          Sign In With Your Propeller Account

          Forgot your password?

          Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

          To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

          More News

          Submit a Story

          Advertisement

          Story Tags ?

          plastic environment oil science

          Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

          Dropping This Article

          No one has dropped this story.

          Groups Watching This

          No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

          Also Submitted By

          No one else has submitted this story.