« Back to story "Galilee communities: We're not racist, we just don't want Arabs - Haaretz - Israel News"

Comments for Galilee communities: We're not racist, we just don't want Arabs - Haaretz - Israel News »

Posted By dissent 6 months, 2 weeks ago in News

Residents of the Misgav bloc of communities in the Galilee consider themselves to be liberal, peace-loving people who support coexistence with their Arab neighbors and even root for Bnei Sakhnin, the soccer club based in a nearby Arab town considered a prominent symbol of that community. Which is why they were shocked this week when proposals raised at local council meetings to accept only applicants who shared their Zionist principles drew negative headlines and criticism for alleged racism.

"The label upsets me," South Africa-born lawyer Michael Zetler, who founded the Misgav community of Manof in 1980 with other immigrants from what was then an apartheid state, said Thursday. "It hurt me. I am not a racist."

Although few people will say so, the panic that spurred the submission of the controversial proposals are related to the High Court of Justice's ruling two years ago that upheld the right of Ahmed and Fahina Zubeidat, an Israeli Arab couple, to buy a house in the exclusively Jewish community of Rakefet notwithstanding the local admissions committee's objection.

Since then, some residents of Jewish communal settlements in the Galilee fear that the region's substantial Arab population might seek to buy property in their communities, where the standard of living is far higher, causing Jews to move out. In some areas of the Galilee this has already taken place:

Read Full Story at haaretz.com »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 153
- Display
  • 100%
    Candida6 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    FTA: "Since then, some residents of Jewish communal settlements in the Galilee fear that the region's substantial Arab population might seek to buy property in their communities, where the standard of living is far higher, causing Jews to move out."

    Interesting. Sounds like block-busting to me. I wonder how those Arabs would "cause" the Jews to move out. Perhaps the same way black families used to "cause" the racist white families to move out of whole city blocks.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
    Reply

    98 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 33%
      Thinker226 months, 2 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      >Sounds like block-busting to me. I wonder how those Arabs would "cause" the Jews to move out. Perhaps the same way black families used to "cause" the racist white families...

      No, dear... You should look much closer. You should look for the ways the Arabs caused the Jews to move out of Gaza, Hebron, Bethlehem, Nablus, Ramallah... You know that not a single Jew lives in those and many other cities and towns with the Arab majority, don't you?

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
      Reply

      29 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 80%
        AnteUp6 months, 2 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Well, there you go again, Thinker22, trying to smush it all together.
        There are ISRAELI Arabs living IN Israel - NOT the Occupied Territories.
        Then there are Arabs who live in the Occupied Territories, Gaza and the West Bank.
        And please DON'T bring up Sharon's removal of the settlements from Gaza - if it is still totally CONTROLLED by Israeli forces................then it is still OCCUPIED.
        The Arabs in the Occupied Territories are waiting for their sovreignity to
        be finalized while those living within Israel should be entitled to the rights of
        any other Israeli - and why not?
        Yeah - those Arabs - they just get everything they want - huh, Thinker?
        Got the world on a string..........? Get real.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply

        26 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • 50%
          Edmar146 months, 2 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Gaza is not controlled at all by Israel, and is not occupied territory. The borders between Gaza and Israel are controlled as are most borders in the world. Israel is under no obligation either domestically or under international law to allow a single non-Israeli citizen to enter into Israel. Israel does not, under any international law, have to allow goods or services to enter Gaza through Israel. And Israel does not have to live up to a different standard than arab countries or any other countries in the world have to live up to. For years, East Berlin controlled the border with West Berlin and prevented exchange of population and goods. Yet East Berlin hardly "occupied" West Berlin. The same was true with East and West Germany, and a hundred other countries. Gaza is not controlled by Israel. Hamas controls Gaza. Israel controls it's border with Gaza. That is not occupation according to any international law.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply

          14 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • 75%
            dissent6 months, 2 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Gaza is not controlled at all by Israel, and is not occupied territory. The borders between Gaza and Israel are controlled as are most borders in the world.

            israel however completely controlling gaza's coastline and airspace in addition to its borders then marching in for a massacre every once in a while against a people who have no military makes it completely unlike "most borders in the world" and therefore suspiciously not unlike occupation

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
            Reply

            10 Replies

            loading loading ...
            • 100%
              Thinker226 months, 2 weeks ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              > israel however completely controlling gaza's coastline and airspace in addition to its borders...

              Yes, it does... Don't you think that it is pretty reasonable during a war?

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
              Reply

              3 Replies

              loading loading ...
              • 100%
                Edmar146 months, 2 weeks ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                I can guarantee without a doubt that if your neighbor fired rockets at your house and yard, you wouldn't wait 8 years to call in the police to stop it. And if they were not successful in stopping your neighbor, you would take whatever steps you felt were necessary to stop it yourself. I don't know what planet you live on, but most human beings won't wait 8 years to stop an aggressive act that continues on and on. Israel did what any other country would have done, except that no other country in the world would have called their neighbors on their cell phones to get out of Harm's way. Please tell us when and how many times Hamas called the people of Sderot or Ashkelon on their cell phones to let them know that the rockets were going to be fired. You continuously play the Poor Palestinian game. They did it to themselves by firing the rockets and used their own populated areas as a launching pad. Israel never marched in for a massacre. They waited 8 years and then said "enough".

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
                • 50%
                  AnteUp6 months, 2 weeks ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  Yeah - but why did it continue in full force during the year long
                  cease fire?
                  IMO, to crush, to disable, and to punish an entire region. That and
                  to ratchet up the tensions just a little bit more. It is a dangerous game
                  they have been playing, risking their own citizens and causing not
                  just a little enmity toward us, because of our unwavering support
                  for Israel.
                  When the kindling finally blossoms to a real live inferno, then
                  Israel points to "Arabs acting badly" and says to the world ....SEE!
                  What can you do with them? They want to exterminate all Jews!

                  The story is wearing thin, Thinker22.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                  Reply

                  1 Reply

                  loading loading ...
                  • 100%
                    Thinker226 months, 2 weeks ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    > ...why did it continue in full force during the year long
                    cease fire?

                    For several reasons, Ante. First, a cease fire in just that, cease of fire having nothing to do with changes in strategy and deployment of the forces.

                    Second, you may not know it but the "year old cease fire" ended two days after its beginning because Palestinians decided to launch several Kassam rockets into Israel.

                    Third, because more than 90 such rockets were launched into Israel during the so- called "year long cease fire".

                    >Israel points to "Arabs acting badly" and says to the world ....SEE!
                    What can you do with them? They want to exterminate all Jews!

                    Did you read the Hamas Charter lately, Ante? If not read it. I can guarantee you that it's not the Israelis who wrote this facinating document:

                    http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                    Reply
                    loading loading ...
                • 67%
                  Candida6 months, 2 weeks ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  The people of Gaza are under an invisible Israeli dome from which bombs drop every once in a while.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                  Reply

                  3 Replies

                  loading loading ...
                  • 50%
                    Edmar146 months, 2 weeks ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    The people of Israel are under an invisible dome from which rockets are fired into their cities on a regular basis.

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                    Reply

                    2 Replies

                    loading loading ...
                    • 100%
                      Candida6 months, 2 weeks ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      Israel is under a dome? Who controls their air space? Who controls their borders?

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                      Reply

                      1 Reply

                      loading loading ...
                      • 100%
                        dissent6 months, 2 weeks ago

                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                        exactly. israel has OUR f16s and OUR apache helicopters and ALL of palestinian airspace. the palestinians have home-made high-school project rockets, some tunnels and a checkpoint queue. how dare they

                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                        Reply
                        loading loading ...
                  • 67%
                    AnteUp6 months, 2 weeks ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    Right, dissent - That's probably why Israel calls them ROUTINE incursions.

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                    Reply

                    1 Reply

                    loading loading ...
                    • 100%
                      dissent6 months, 2 weeks ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      israel arent occupiers, they're more like.... consultants.

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                      Reply
                      loading loading ...
                  • 50%
                    AnteUp6 months, 2 weeks ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    OMG! Edmar14 -

                    BORDERS?? Like the sand on the beaches that form the Gaza coast
                    is their western border? The Israelis completely control access to Gaza
                    from the Mediterranean - that's inbound AND outbound. You are a fisherman
                    from Gaza? Of course you can fish in your own stretch of the ocean .........
                    but keep in mind - you WILL be risking your life!
                    You later reference international law. How much of the Mediterranean
                    is - according to international law - supposed to belong to Gaza?
                    How many miles might they claim for their use - IF it weren't being
                    controlled by the Israeli government?

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                    Reply

                    2 Replies

                    loading loading ...
                    • 100%
                      Edmar146 months, 2 weeks ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      If the people of Gaza want it to be different, they need to negotiate a better deal. For 30 years there was no need for a fence, border crossings, barrier etc. The people of Gaza worked and played in Israel. Then came the Intifada and the suicide bombers. They did it to themselves. And if you and they aren't smart enough to see that, then they deserve what they get. Today, four Gazans tried to blow up Israeli soldiers using horses as disguises. When the Israeli army saw that the men were planting explosives, they fired at them and killed all four. This is what came out of Gaza, and I quote: "Ismail Haniyeh, who heads Gaza's Hamas government, praised the militants as "martyrs" and said the violence confirmed Israel's "aggressive intentions" toward the Palestinians." Just who started the aggression by planting bombs? I'm embarrassed for the Palestinians that their leaders would make a statement of that kind. It's obvious that no one in Gaza can take any responsibility for their actions, including the government. And you want a Palestinian state? EARN IT.

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                      Reply

                      1 Reply

                      loading loading ...
                      • 100%
                        Candida6 months, 2 weeks ago

                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                        Edmar14: "If the people of Gaza want it to be different, they need to negotiate a better deal."

                        On their knees.

                        "When the Israeli army saw that the men were planting explosives, they fired at them and killed all four. "

                        Where were they planting the explosives? In Gaza or in Israel? If it was in "independent" Gaza, how would they blow up Israeli soldiers there? If it was in Israel, how did they get into Israel with horses and the explosives?

                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                        Reply
                        loading loading ...
                  • 100%
                    Thinker226 months, 2 weeks ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    > There are ISRAELI Arabs living IN Israel - NOT the Occupied Territories.
                    Then there are Arabs who live in the Occupied Territories, Gaza and the West Bank...

                    ...but there are no Jews there. This brings us back to my original question: Do you know that there are Arabs living IN ISRAEL but there are no Jews living under Palestinian Authority or in Gaza?

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                    Reply

                    10 Replies

                    loading loading ...
                    • 100%
                      AnteUp6 months, 2 weeks ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      According to the news - Hamas is in charge in Gaza...whatever.

                      I cannot imagine an Israeli citizen who would CHOOSE to live in Gaza -
                      but when they did have settlements there?
                      From the Jewish Virtual Library online article about the settlements
                      of Gaza:
                      The largest group of settlements is the Katif bloc, located along the southern Gaza coastline. These settlements block access to the coast from the major Palestinian cities of Khan Yunis and Rafah and cement Israeli control on the Egypt-Gaza border. Another group of settlements (comprising Elei Sinai, Dugit, and Nisanit) are located along Gaza's northern border with Israel, expanding the Israeli presence from the city of Ashkelon (inside Israel) to the edges of Gaza City (the Erez Industrial zone is part of this bloc). Netzarim, Kfar Darom, and Morag are strategically located in the heart of the Gaza Strip (along a north-south axis), creating a framework for Israeli control of the area and its main transportation route, and facilitating Israel's ability to divide the Gaza Strip into separate areas and isolate each area's inhabitants. In addition, the settlements control prime agricultural land, some of the area's main aquifers, and approximately one-third of the total Gaza coastline.

                      Must have been great having them as neighbors - because even
                      then................it was all about CONTROL. Control BY and FOR the
                      benefit of Israeli Jews - only tough love and living conditions for
                      Palestinians.

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                      Reply

                      2 Replies

                      loading loading ...
                      • 100%
                        Edmar146 months, 2 weeks ago

                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                        The interesting part of your post is that Israel removed all of the settlements and all of it's military from Gaza in 2005 as a gesture and to see if they could build a government that could rule them effectively and in peace. Had the people of Gaza run with the ball, they would have set an example by which Israel would have separated themselves from the West Bank as well. But as you can see, the people of Gaza destroyed the most advanced greenhouses in the world that were left to them and they allowed Hamas to gain control. Instead of peace and prosperity, the Gazans got a militant government and Israel got rockets fired into it's cities. And you can't understand why Israel won't give more? You can't be that stupid!!!!

                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                        Reply
                        loading loading ...
                        • 100%
                          Thinker226 months, 2 weeks ago

                          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                          >I cannot imagine an Israeli citizen who would CHOOSE to live in Gaza -
                          but when they did have settlements there?

                          Can you imagine Arab citizens who would CHOOSE to live in Israel? If so it, probably, means that Arabs live in Israel much beter (and safer) than Jews in Gaza. Yes, there were Jewish settlements in Gaza and the Arabs made it look like those settlements were the only reason for Arab violence... just like they make the settlements in the West Bank look like today. Settlements were removed from Gaza and the violence did not stop... but 1.4 million Arabs still live in Israel.

                          > Must have been great having them as neighbors - because even
                          then................it was all about CONTROL. Control BY and FOR the
                          benefit of Israeli Jews - only tough love and living conditions for
                          Palestinians.

                          There are no settlements in Gaza anymore. There is no Katif bloc, located along the southern Gaza coastline; there is no Elei Sinai, Dugit, and Nisanit located along Gaza's northern border with Israel; there are no Netzarim, Kfar Darom, and Morag strategically located in the heart of the Gaza Strip... Don't you rejoice, Ante? Aren't you happy for the Palestinians of Gaza? What are you complaining about?

                          On the other hand, there are 1.4 million Arabs living in Arab settlements (sorry, Arab towns and villages) in and around Jerusalem, in the Galilee and the Northern part of Israel facilitating Arab ability to divide Israel into separate areas, etc. Wold you understand Israelis willing to get rid of them just like the good people of Gaza were willing to get rid of the Jews?

                          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                          Reply
                          loading loading ...
                        • 100%
                          Candida6 months, 2 weeks ago

                          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                          Thinker22: "Do you know that there are Arabs living IN ISRAEL but there are no Jews living under Palestinian Authority"

                          Slippery, slippery, as usual. You didn't say West Bank, you said "under Palestinian Authority" because you know very well that lots of Jews live in the West Bank, but not only their settlements but even their roads are taken out of the control of the Palestinian Authority making life for the Arab population a living hell.

                          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                          Reply

                          6 Replies

                          loading loading ...
                          • Neutral
                            Thinker226 months, 2 weeks ago

                            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                            >You didn't say West Bank, you said "under Palestinian Authority"...

                            Yes, I did, Candida. You see, 1.4 million Arabs live under ISRAELI Government but no Jews live under Palestinian government... and nothing was "taken out of the control of the Palestinian Authority" as the Palestinian Authority was created less than 15 years ago and since then authority was only GIVEN

                            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                            Reply

                            5 Replies

                            loading loading ...
                            • Neutral
                              Candida6 months, 2 weeks ago

                              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                              No new settlements in the past 15 years?

                              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                              Reply

                              4 Replies

                              loading loading ...
                              • Neutral
                                Thinker226 months, 2 weeks ago

                                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                > No new settlements in the past 15 years?

                                Yes, no new settlements built on lands given to the Palestinian Authority during the last 15 years... but,as usual, feel free to PROVE ME WRONG by showing an example of a new settlement built on lands taken FROM the Palestinian Authority.

                                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                Reply

                                3 Replies

                                loading loading ...
                                • Neutral
                                  Candida6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                  "Israel opened the way for possible expansion of the Efrat settlement by taking control of a nearby West Bank hill of 423 acres. "

                                  "Yesh Din, an Israeli human rights group involved in the Efrat expansion case, said Monday that over the years Israel's government has assigned almost all areas designated as state land to settlements. The group said that is a violation of international law, which requires an occupying power to act for the benefit of the local population. "

                                  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic...

                                  "Israel's expansion of settlements into Palestinian territory is an "illegal move" that undermines Middle East peace, says Canada's foreign affairs minister."

                                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                  Reply

                                  2 Replies

                                  loading loading ...
                                  • Neutral
                                    Candida6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                    Here is the link for the second quote:
                                    http://www.vancouversun.com/News/Expansion+Israeli...

                                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 10) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                    Reply

                                    1 Reply

                                    loading loading ...
                                    • Neutral
                                      Thinker226 months, 2 weeks ago

                                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                      Let me repeat my statement above, Candida:

                                      > No new settlements built on lands given to the Palestinian Authority during the last 15 years... but,as usual, feel free to PROVE ME WRONG by showing an example of a new settlement built on lands taken FROM the Palestinian Authority.

                                      Please free to show that the lands for Efrat or any other settlements were taken FROM the Palestinian authority. Such lands BY DEFINITION are ONLY lands that were given to the PA in accordance with the Oslo Accords or other official agreements between Israel and the Palestinians. These are NOT all lands that are not officially considered Israeli lands.

                                      Some people (including Canadian ministers) refer to all lands beyond the cease fire lines of 1949 as 'Palestinian territory'. This is wrong and misleading. Not all lands that ARE NOT part of Israel ARE 'Palestinian lands' just like not all lands in your street that do not belong to your neighbor are YOUR lands.

                                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 11) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                      Reply
                                      loading loading ...
                      • 50%
                        AnteUp6 months, 2 weeks ago

                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                        Thinker22 ~
                        You state that not a single Jew lives in Hebron?
                        The world is overflowing with video reports on the treatment of Palestinians
                        and international monitors in Hebron at the hands of their Jewish neighbors.

                        How could you say that?

                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                        Reply

                        1 Reply

                        loading loading ...
                    • Neutral
                      most_reasonable6 months, 2 weeks ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      "Since then, some residents of Jewish communal settlements in the Galilee fear that the region's substantial Arab population might seek to buy property in their communities"

                      Selling to a Jew in the Middle East, especially in the West Bank and Gaza is a death sentence.

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                      Reply
                      loading loading ...
                    • 100%
                      Candida6 months, 2 weeks ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      FTA: "When we decided to move to Manof, we sought a community that chose similar basic principles to our own, such as good education for children, culture, celebrating a Jewish communal lifestyle and protecting the environment," a woman from Manof said. "We joined this community knowing it is founded on these values."

                      This is like saying that "When we decided to move here, we sought a community that chose similar basic principles to our own, such as good education for children, culture, celebrating a Christian communal lifestyle (or white European heritage) and protecting the environment. We joined this community knowing it is founded on these values."

                      Doesn't she see how wrong such a statement is, or is she unable to look at it from any other perspective than her own?

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                      Reply
                      loading loading ...
                      • 100%
                        Candida6 months, 2 weeks ago

                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                        FTA: 'Which is why they were shocked this week when proposals raised at local council meetings to accept only applicants who shared their Zionist principles drew negative headlines and criticism for alleged racism.
                        "The label upsets me," South Africa-born lawyer Michael Zetler, who founded the Misgav community of Manof in 1980 with other immigrants from what was then an apartheid state, said Thursday. "It hurt me. I am not a racist." '

                        He wants to practice apartheid and it upsets him if someone calls him racist? How would he feel if he were excluded from a desirable community because it only accepted Muslims, or Christians, or Asians? I've had a Jewish friends who was offended by the Christmas celebrations in the office because she "felt excluded" even though everybody was welcome and the celebrations had no religious connotations.

                        Don't these people realize that in many European countries before WWII people sometimes used the same justifications for excluding Jews from certain professions, places or activities? It was wrong then, so why do they expect others to like the same discrimination?

                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                        Reply

                        34 Replies

                        loading loading ...
                        • 100%
                          LumFan6 months, 2 weeks ago

                          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                          Sounds to me like the first suburbanites from the US back in the day, when they were moving away from the African-Americans by saying that they wanted to be with their own kind. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

                          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                          Reply

                          23 Replies

                          loading loading ...
                          • 0%
                            cheif6 months, 2 weeks ago

                            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                            I agree...why is there comfort in living with people who look like you and have similar cultural experiences? It's been going on since there were people. In spite of all the social engineering done by our federal government, we now have more separation of the
                            races than before it began...by choice. Black people finally realized their children won't get smarter by sitting beside a white child, that's why they now have all black schools in areas
                            where they were formally integrated. They made a choice. These Isralies are making
                            choices to live with their own people; not being racists. I'll bet if they integrate the neighborhood, the Arabs will still congregate with their own; same as the Jews.
                            It's not a racist problem...it's a human one. Understand it and live with it.

                            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                            Reply

                            8 Replies

                            loading loading ...
                            • 100%
                              dissent6 months, 2 weeks ago

                              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                              it may be 2009 but there are still people dusting off the same old lame, ignorant and dangerous arguments from the deep south 1955 or apartheid south africa 1975.

                              this is the inertia to progress. these days most racists are smart enough not to admit it. take the liberal jews of galilee in this article for example

                              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                              Reply

                              1 Reply

                              loading loading ...
                              • 75%
                                Natureboy6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                Except for the players being Ashkenazim vs Arab, this could be plenty of places in the U.S., with financially secure white "liberals" freaking out as the black and the brown gradually appear in their neighborhoods and schools.

                                Liberals often have benign intentions towards minorities and the underclasses, but prefer them at a distance.

                                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                Reply
                                loading loading ...
                              • Neutral
                                Edmar146 months, 2 weeks ago

                                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                It doesn't have to be a negative experience to want to build a community with people of the same ethnicities and culture. You are claiming that in all cases it's wrong and that just isn't correct. Who are you to judge what the comfort level of other people should be? There's nothing wrong with the Little Chinas and Little Italys of the world. They add culture to our cities. I love going into Little Italy for a good Italian meal. And I don't feel the least bit outraged that the people still want to live within their own ethnic group. It's not necessarily a bad thing.

                                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                Reply

                                3 Replies

                                loading loading ...
                                • 100%
                                  alamintalib6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                  You are right, unity for the most part is a great ting to see. many of the communities had to form to protect themselves from racism and acts of violence.

                                  Just personally, if someone enjoys our company or community and wishes to be a part of it............welcome!

                                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                  Reply
                                  loading loading ...
                                  • 100%
                                    dissent6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                    jews moving out because arabs are moving in... tell me how this is not a "negative experience"?

                                    okay, maybe you're having a little trouble empathizing... so let's put it another way, how would YOU feel if aryans move out because jews are moving in?

                                    would that be "adding to the culture of our cities"? would you not "feel the least bit outraged that the people [aryans] would want to live within their own ethnic group"?

                                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                    Reply
                                    loading loading ...
                                    • 100%
                                      Candida6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                      Edmar14: "There's nothing wrong with the Little Chinas and Little Italys of the world."

                                      No there isn't. The problems start when they want to keep others out and formulate policies to do so. As long as people seek out the company of those similar to them voluntarily, I don't see anything wrong with it. In the park in my neighborhood, Hindus tend to picnic with other Hindus, Chinese with other Chinese, Muslims with other Muslims, but they don't try to keep the other groups out of the park. When any group blocks others from entering an area, profession, place, etc., then it's wrong, wrong, wrong!

                                      It wasn't that long ago when you could see signs in restaurants: "No Jews or dogs allowed." It should never happen again to any group.

                                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                      Reply
                                      loading loading ...
                                    • 100%
                                      AnteUp6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                      The parents of African American children did not want their children
                                      to be integrated into the educational system to rub elbows with caucasians -
                                      they wanted their children to have EQUAL opportunities.
                                      Inner-city schools and rural southern schools were never maintained
                                      and staffed as schools in caucasian neighborhoods.

                                      You state: Black people finally realized their children won't get smarter by sitting beside a white child, that's why they now have all black schools in areas
                                      where they were formally integrated.

                                      I think African Americans always knew that their children wouldn't get
                                      smarter from sitting next to a white child - assinine!
                                      That some previously integrated schools are mono-racial now?
                                      Maybe the finding is being shared more evenly between the schools,
                                      or districts, or just maybe they don't like their children being bussed.
                                      Bussing as a solution was a very controversial issue for parents
                                      of ALL ethnicities because of the amount of TIME and the DISTANCE.

                                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                      Reply

                                      1 Reply

                                      loading loading ...
                                      • Neutral
                                        AnteUp6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                        oops! .................FUNDING - not "finding".............my mistake

                                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                        Reply
                                        loading loading ...
                                    • 100%
                                      bluetexasvalley6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                      LumFan, so good to see you! (((LumFan)))

                                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                      Reply
                                      loading loading ...
                                      • Neutral
                                        Thinker226 months, 2 weeks ago

                                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                        > Sounds to me like the first suburbanites from the US back in the day, when they were moving away from the African-Americans...

                                        Did African-Americans planted bombs in their backyars then? Did African-Americans shoot their children in the head? If they did (like the Arabs are doing in Israel) then, maybe, American suburbanites can somehow be understood...

                                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                        Reply

                                        12 Replies

                                        loading loading ...
                                        • 100%
                                          Candida6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                          Are all Arabs terrorists?

                                          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                          Reply

                                          8 Replies

                                          loading loading ...
                                          • Neutral
                                            Thinker226 months, 2 weeks ago

                                            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                            No, not all Arabs are terrorists. There are many peaceful non-violent Arabs and no one has any problems with them. It's the violent murderous fanatics we have a problem with.

                                            I can assure you that not all Japanese were kamikazes and not all Germans were Nazis during WWII. Nevertheless, neither the Japanese nor Germans were welcomed into American neighborhoods at the time.

                                            it took some time for the Germans and the Japanese to regain the trust of their American neighbors. It will take some time for the Arabs as well to gain the trust of Israeli Jews AFTER elimination of terrorist organizations and establishment of peace in the Middle East.

                                            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                            Reply

                                            7 Replies

                                            loading loading ...
                                            • 100%
                                              AnteUp6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                              AND those living in Judea and Samaria?

                                              If they are GOOD Palestinians can they have their homes,
                                              and live their lives unmolested, Thinker22?
                                              Oh - and can they PLEASE continue to farm their
                                              land and tend their flocks on THEIR land, Thinker22.

                                              Might be an impediment to the "natural growth" of the
                                              people CHOSEN for that land - huh Thinker22?

                                              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                              Reply

                                              6 Replies

                                              loading loading ...
                                              • Neutral
                                                Thinker226 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                >If they are GOOD Palestinians can they have their homes,
                                                and live their lives unmolested...

                                                But of course! To do that they'll have to NEGOTIATE a peace agreement with Israel and comply with its terms.This (still non-existing) peace agreement will, among other things, define the exact borders of THEIR land where these GOOD Palestinians will be able to tend their flocks unmolested. Unfortunately, without a peace agreement no one knows where THEIR lands are.

                                                Is it clear enough, AnteUp?

                                                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                Reply

                                                5 Replies

                                                loading loading ...
                                                • 100%
                                                  AnteUp6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                  Re: Is it clear enough, AnteUp?............................No.
                                                  Why would the Palestinians need a peace agreement to know where their
                                                  lands are - IF they have DEEDS?
                                                  Because Israel will not acknowledge the legitimacy of Palestinian deeds?

                                                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                  Reply

                                                  4 Replies

                                                  loading loading ...
                                                  • Neutral
                                                    Thinker226 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                    IF they have DEEDS they should bring these deeds to the Israeli court and demand compensation in each and every case the property defined in those deeds was taken from them.

                                                    The fact, however, is that THEY DO NOT HAVE DEEDS as prior to 1948 the Palestinians (or Arabs as they were referred to) collectively owned only 11% of the land in Palestine. These 11% is the maximum they can have DEEDS for.

                                                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                    Reply

                                                    3 Replies

                                                    loading loading ...
                                                    • 100%
                                                      AnteUp6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                      Re: prior to 1948 the Palestinians (or Arabs as they were referred to) collectively owned only 11% of the land in Palestine.

                                                      Well NOT according to this source:

                                                      http://www.palestineremembered.com/Acre/Maps/Story...

                                                      The source for this map is Village Statistics (Jerusalem:Palestine Government 1945).
                                                      It was subsequently published as United Nations map no. 94(b) in August of 1950.

                                                      Percentage of land ownership as of April 1943:
                                                      Palestinian & other: 94.22% Jewish: 5.8%

                                                      As of 1947, Jews in Palestine owned UNDER 7% of the Palestine's lands?

                                                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 10) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                      Reply

                                                      2 Replies

                                                      loading loading ...
                                                      • 100%
                                                        AnteUp6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                        Then again, Thinker22, if you go to: zionism-israel.com, you can find the following
                                                        explanation:

                                                        This map, prepared by the UN "Subcommittee on the Palestine Question" purports to show that Arabs owned most of the land in Mandatory Palestine. Arab landownership is deliberately exaggerated by dividing the land into "Jewish" and "non-Jewish" ownership. However, the land included under "non-Jewish ownership includes government lands. For example, the map shows that "Jews" owned less than 1% of the land in the Beersheba district. In fact, nearly all the land in the Beersheba district was government owned land that belonged to the British mandate, and should have been made available for Jewish ownership under article 6 of the League of Nations mandate. In any case, "Arabs" did not own this land. From the map, we can also learn that the eventual outlines of "Green Line" Israel (borders of 1949 armistice) closely followed the pattern of Jewish land ownership. In the West Bank, Jews owned less than 1% of the land, and in Gaza about 4%. Small areas of land abandoned in 1948 were recaptured in the 1967 Six day war. See also The Land Question in Palestine

                                                        I love "purports to show ", and, "should have been made available for Jewish ownership"

                                                        Somebody is very busy re-writing history and I don't think we will ever agree on
                                                        just whom that might be.

                                                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 11) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                        Reply

                                                        1 Reply

                                                        loading loading ...
                                                        • Neutral
                                                          Thinker226 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                          Yes, this is exactly how the misinterpretation of the land ownership in Palestine was created: show the lands owned by the Jews (about 8%) and then ASSUME that everything else belonged to the Palestinian Arabs. The very same logic can be applied in a claim that if your negibor across the street owns 2% of the land in that street then the remaining 98% of the street belong to YOU. Nice, is not it?

                                                          Here is another statement from the same source you can use as well:

                                                          A map that is often presented in pro-Palestinian accounts enhances the impression that Palestine had belonged to the Arabs and had been "stolen" by the Jews. The map was prepared by a subcommittee of the UN and shows "Jewish" and "non-Jewish" land ownership in different areas. The "catch" is that all of the land that was not purchased and registered to Jews or the Jewish agency, including government lands, is categorized as "non-Jewish." The Beersheba district, which was 99% government land, is shown as being 99% "Non-Jewish" (see Palestine Land Ownership Map 1944) It was also "99% non-Arab."

                                                          Yes, Ante, the Beersheba district was 99% NON-ARAB and Palestine as a whole was 80% non-Arab. This is how the Jews owned only 8% of the land there while the Arabs owned 12%...

                                                          A map that is often presented in pro-Palestinian accounts enhances the impression that Palestine had belonged to the Arabs and had been "stolen" by the Jews. The map was prepared by a subcommittee of the UN and shows "Jewish" and "non-Jewish" land ownership in different areas. The "catch" is that all of the land that was not purchased and registered to Jews or the Jewish agency, including government lands, is categorized as "non-Jewish." The Beersheba district, which was 99% government land, is shown as being 99% "Non-Jewish" (see Palestine Land Ownership Map 1944) It was also "99% non-Arab."

                                                          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 13) (recursion depth : 12) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                          Reply
                                                          loading loading ...
                                          • 100%
                                            AnteUp6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                            You state:
                                            Did African-Americans shoot their children in the head? If they did (like the Arabs are doing in Israel)..............

                                            That is one of THE most disgusting statements, Thinker22.
                                            In a thread not long ago - someone, but I don't think it was you -
                                            said that Palestinians LIKE their children to get maimed and killed
                                            because they want to parade the bodies for the media.

                                            A new low in propaganda - where'd you get that - the IDF?

                                            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                            Reply

                                            1 Reply

                                            loading loading ...
                                            • Neutral
                                              Thinker226 months, 2 weeks ago

                                              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                              I'd recommend you to READ the statements you're replying to prior to replying. In this case, if you've paid some attention to the statement you've replied to you would realize its meaning. I'll try to help you with this one:

                                              > Sounds to me like the first suburbanites from the US back in the day, when they were moving away from the African-Americans...

                                              Did African-Americans planted bombs in their [the first suburbanites] backyards then? Did African-Americans shoot their [the first suburbanites] children in the head?

                                              The Palestinians DID AND DO plant bombs in Israeli buses, shopping centers, pizza parlors and schools. They did and do shoot Israeli children in the head. They DID pay 20 shekels to a 10-year ARAB boy from Haifa to carry a bomb into a packed bus. Several years ago a red-heared pregnant British woman was removed from an El-Al plane in London because a bomb was found in her luggage. Her Palestinian fiancee bought her a ticket and sent his girlfriend carrying his baby to meet his family in the West Bank... How would you call THIS, Ante?

                                              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                              Reply
                                              loading loading ...
                                            • Neutral
                                              Natureboy6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                              "Did African-Americans shoot their children in the head?"

                                              If so, they could have qualified for the IDF. Headshots on children are their favorite thing.

                                              http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleea...

                                              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                              Reply
                                              loading loading ...
                                          • Neutral
                                            Edmar146 months, 2 weeks ago

                                            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                            In just about every major city in the world, you can find a Chinese quarter, an Italian quarter (little Italy), etc. There is absolutely nothing wrong with people of similar ethnic backgrounds wanting to live, work and share together. It is human nature to want to live where you are most comfortable. This practice has been going on since the dawn of man. It exists in the animal world as well. Lions don't share their dens with hyenas. It's not apartheid. It is human nature. It becomes apartheid when citizens are denied the same basic rights as other citizens because they are different. In the United states during the great immigration of the late 1890's and early 1900's, individuals who were granted permission to enter this country sought out communities with the same ethnic background as their own. Don't ever forget that the word "community" has many different meanings. Churches, Synagogues, Mosques all tend to center around specific ethnic neighborhoods. To want to live together with similar ethnicities is not a crime. Depriving someone of the same basic rights that you enjoy is. But if a community wants to maintain it's ethnic heritage by living together solely with members of the same group, it doesn't have to be a negative.

                                            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                            Reply

                                            9 Replies

                                            loading loading ...
                                            • 100%
                                              dissent6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                              this article is about jews moving out because arabs are moving in.

                                              how does your rambling comment relate to this?

                                              btw... lions and hyenas? they are different SPECIES. human beings are not. i know, i know, it's too much to expect a history professor to know such things. it's not your discipline

                                              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                              Reply

                                              4 Replies

                                              loading loading ...
                                              • 0%
                                                Edmar146 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                The argument is about how racist it is to keep areas only for a specific group. Some on this thread have used the word apartheid, others have said it is racist. I took the position that it's not always a terrible thing to want to live with your own ethnicity. If that is rambling, then so be it. Just for edification, I didn't use the lion and Hyena comparison as a comparison of specias, only as an example of differences. Maybe you just aren't smart enough to have caught that. I certainly knew what I meant when I posted it.

                                                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                Reply

                                                1 Reply

                                                loading loading ...
                                                • Neutral
                                                  dissent6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                  I didn't use the lion and Hyena comparison as a comparison of specias, only as an example of differences.

                                                  by comparing people of different race to animals of different species speaks more about your inherent racism that you are not even aware of yourself than it does of any differences between peoples.

                                                  the fact that i actually have to spell this out to you is clear that it's simple, obvious intelligent logic will already be lost on you

                                                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                  Reply
                                                  loading loading ...
                                                • 100%
                                                  AnteUp6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                  Hey, dissent, I can relate to Edmar14's chain of thought.
                                                  I had an Auntie in Hampton, Virginia. She informed us
                                                  that that was why God made Redbirds red, and Blue Birds
                                                  blue................he didn't want the colors mixing.
                                                  We decided not to extend our visit.

                                                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                  Reply

                                                  1 Reply

                                                  loading loading ...
                                                  • 100%
                                                    dissent6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                    i think the sooner the colors mix the better this world will be. i'm one such contributor to the stirring of the pot, both in myself and what i have already passed on. the future, should there be one, will belong to the third culture kids.

                                                    i'm sick and tired of the old world arrogance and ignorance as exhibited by edmar. it's prohibiting our evolution as a species and drowning the world in its negativity

                                                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                    Reply
                                                    loading loading ...
                                                • 100%
                                                  Candida6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                  Edmar14: "It becomes apartheid when citizens are denied the same basic rights as other citizens because they are different."

                                                  Yes, and denying the right to Arabs to buy a home in an area is not denying them the same basic rights as other citizens because they are different?

                                                  Seeking out communities with the same ethnic background is not the same as formally denying others the right to enter.

                                                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                  Reply

                                                  3 Replies

                                                  loading loading ...
                                                  • 0%
                                                    Edmar146 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                    Just in case you've been living under a rock for all of these years, the People of the West Bank and Gaza are not Israeli citizens and like every other country in the world, are not entitled to the same rights and privileges as are Israeli citizens. That isn't apartheid. The people of Gaza have their own government and are no longer occupied by Israel. That makes them independent of Israel and it is their government's responsibility for their welfare.

                                                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                    Reply

                                                    2 Replies

                                                    loading loading ...
                                                    • 100%
                                                      Candida6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                      No, the people of Gaza and the West Bank are not citizens of Israel, but they are not independent either; they are still under occupation, but that's neither here nor there. This article is not about them. This is about Arabs who are Israeli citizens.

                                                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                      Reply
                                                      loading loading ...
                                                      • 100%
                                                        dissent6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                        Just in case you've been living under a rock for all of these years, the People of the West Bank and Gaza are not Israeli citizens and like every other country in the world

                                                        the article is about jews moving out because israeli arabs are moving in. that means the arabs are from ISRAEL. that means that they ARE israeli citizens. they are NOT from the west bank or gaza

                                                        you're the one under the rock, edmar

                                                        try again

                                                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                        Reply
                                                        loading loading ...
                                                • 67%
                                                  Natureboy6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                  Telling that the dynamic is presented as Jews vs Arabs.

                                                  There are many Arab Jews in Israel, and they have faced a great deal of racism and discrimination from European-descended Jews. Think those Mizrahim would be welcome in this "progressive" community?

                                                  This is not about religion. Never has been. This is about white europeans taking over a region and making the original inhabitants second-class citizens. It's apartheid South Africa all over again.

                                                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                  Reply

                                                  2 Replies

                                                  loading loading ...
                                                  • 50%
                                                    Edmar146 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                    Please, before you post, get your history straight. It's all about religion, plain and simple. There was never a country called Palestine, never an autonomous Palestinian government. Both the majority of the Jew and Arabs that lived in Palestine before 1948 were immigrants. The only "original" inhabitants were 250,000 Muslims, Jews and Christians who lived in Palestine before 1916. What it is about is a piece of land which had no government. A piece of land which had been occupied territory for almost 2000 years. A piece of land which was partitioned in 1922 by the British Mandate government into Jordan (on 2/3 of the land) and a yet to be determined remainder. Not a single one of you ever talks about giving Jordan back to the Palestinians, or how Jordan was established to be a national Palestinian homeland. That's because Jordan is Muslim. Not a single one of you is ever outraged by how the Jordanians treated the occupants of the West Bank between 1948 and 1967. That's because Jordan is Muslim. Not a single one of you ever mentions that the West Bank and Gaza weren't even a topic of conversation for a second Palestinian homeland before Israel took them over in 1967. That's because Jordan is Muslim and Israel is Jewish. It's all about religion and you know it. And Natureboy, all 55 Muslim countries consider their non-Muslim citizens and women to be second class citizens. Now that's a very big apartheid that you never talk about. Why? It's all about religion.

                                                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                    Reply

                                                    1 Reply

                                                    loading loading ...
                                                    • Neutral
                                                      alamintalib6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                      The story of Sampson

                                                      Samson's activity takes place during a time when God was punishing the Israelites, by giving them "into the hand of the Philistines". Added note again, "Filastine" is the proper Arabic for Palestine.

                                                      The Philistines occupied the five cities of Gaza, Ashkelon, Ashdod, Ekron, and Gath, along the coastal strip of southwestern Canaan, that belonged to Egypt up to the closing days of the Nineteenth Dynasty (ended 1185 BC). The biblical stories of Samson, Samuel, Saul and David include accounts of Philistine-Israelite conflicts.

                                                      There were no "countries" as we know them today.

                                                      This conflict is a "family" conflict.

                                                      You speak of 2000 years, we are barely 200 years as a nation

                                                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                      Reply
                                                      loading loading ...
                                                  • 0%
                                                    Mutainia6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                    The title should say, "We're Not Racist, We Just Don't Want Islam." Saying "Arabs" changes the subject and plays into the hands of Israel's enemies. It MAKES it a racial issue (which Muhammadans so desperately WANT it to be so they can win victimhood statis).

                                                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                    Reply
                                                    loading loading ...
                                                    • 0%
                                                      Icantwait6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                      My Fellow Americans: It is now official, as reported by the Back Pocket Media, Obama is GOD. Also, reported by the Back Pocket Media, according to Obama's Muslim roots he is very comfortable identifying with the Muslims.

                                                      Now, I'm a bit confused. Should we call Obama God, or should we call him ABBA, sorry, AHHaa, again my mistake, Allah, or whatever?

                                                      Here's an interesting fact: There was an election in Europe an the Communist lost to the Conservatives. Now, the Communist believe they should change the name of the Communist party to Democratic party because they feel it might be keeping them from getting votes. Kinda like our Country except in reverse.

                                                      You know, I don't think it is a good idea for GOD to be bowing to an A-RAB. What do you think, help me out.

                                                      Finally, I hope Mrs O gets back to the Black House soon because she still has some seeds to sow in her Garden. Do you think she bought all the necessities she need after staying behind to do a little shopping? I wonder if she took a Glider home just to save some fuel. I know they mention cutting back like the rest of America. Oh Well! Here's hoping.

                                                      This was so good I had to print it twice. The Real American

                                                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                      Reply

                                                      1 Reply

                                                      loading loading ...
                                                      • 100%
                                                        Natureboy6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                        "Finally, I hope Mrs O gets back to the Black House soon because she still has some seeds to sow in her Garden."

                                                        I'm glad it's no longer the White House. Progress!

                                                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                        Reply
                                                        loading loading ...
                                                      • Neutral
                                                        kamruddin6 months, 2 weeks ago

                                                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                                                        Residents of the Misgav bloc of communities in the Galilee consider themselves to be liberal, peace-loving people who support coexistence with their Arab neighbors and even root for Bnei Sakhnin, the soccer club based in a nearby Arab town considered a prominent symbol of that community. Which is why they were shocked this week when proposals raised at local council meetings to accept only applicants who shared their Zionist principles drew negative headlines and criticism for alleged racism.

                                                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                                                        Reply
                                                        loading loading ...

                                                        Add a Comment

                                                        Sign In With Your Propeller Account

                                                        Forgot your password?

                                                        Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

                                                        To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.