Story Comments
Posted by: CHAM 6 months, 2 weeks ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-

CHAM6 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It ยป
Chef. Actually, I was thinking of what just might be the real evil? Wasn't the Korean War easing to an end and wasn't re-conciliation actually occurring say 20 years ago?
Reply
What changed the tone?
Seems I recall a speech about the "Axis of Evil". And never forget the Neo-Con publicly stated "Plan for a New American Century". Initiate a problem, propagandize the problem, intervene for "self-Protection" from that problem.
That Neo-Con model has worked quite well since it was published ( by PNAC) in the 90's and actually practiced before then. It has gotten us into several conflicts where we could build Empire.
The cost was minimal ( to the Neo-Cons ) not so minimal to the victims or the Americans who had to help profit the Neo-Con plan.
The question should be, "Is the blustering of Kim for a defensive purpose, or is it to attack someone?" As I recall all this escalated with the advent of the Bush speech.
People Who Liked This Comment (8)
People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment negatively.
Submit a Story
Advertisement

loading ...
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.