Breaking: SCOTUS stops Chrysler sale »

Posted By pc25 5 months ago in News

The Supreme Court, in an order signed by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, has stopped the sale of Chrysler to Fiat and the bankruptcy plan engineered by the White House. No details are available quite yet on the story, but I will be watching for updates on the wires and blogs.

Read Full Story at hotair.com »

269 Views Share Story 36 Comments Report

Submitted By:
pc25

studio engineer, studio musician, producer

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 36 (view all)
- Display
  • 91%
    pc255 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    the backlash against Obama's over reach begins

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 91%
      slate5 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      RUT RO!

      It was signed by Ruth Bader Ginsburg to boot. How will this be spun? Did the cons force the frail Ginsburg to do this? Has she become a neo-con in her waning days as a Justice?

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      7 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 89%
      pc255 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Interesting that Justice Ginsburg stopped the deal.......

      FTA

      The move will allow the justices to consider whether to allow a full hearing of the legal issues — a delay which Chrysler and US officials say could cause the plan to collapse.

      A group of Indiana pension funds opposed to Chrysler’s sale to Fiat filed the emergency appeal with the Supreme Court to halt the sale.

      The pension funds wanted a hearing on alleged violations to due process that damaged their standing in the bankruptcy.

      You can not kick your creditors to the curb the way the Obama administration with Chrysler.......

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 88%
        pc255 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        http://www.americanissuesproject.org/blogs/columns...

        The Whim of a Madman

        Now, however, the Obama administration wants the senior creditors to take a back seat while unsecured creditors get the lion's share of the bankruptcy proceeds. The senior creditors hold almost $7 billion in face value of debt, for which they would get $2 billion in cash and exit Chrysler altogether. The UAW, holding unsecured liabilities amounting to $10 billion for its pension fund, will give up half of that amount in exchange for 55 percent of the restructured Chrysler. The rest of Chrysler will be owned by Fiat, who will invest around $8 billion, with 10 percent going a partnership between the US and Canada – after American taxpayers will invest more than Fiat and the UAW combined during the execution of this bankruptcy.

        not in this country friends.........

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 89%
          nostalgia5 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          If the Court decides to hear this, it will also impact the GM bankruptcy

          I'm glad the Chrysler bond holders decided to pursue this

          I can't believe the Obama administration even bothered to think through the possible consequences of their actions

          Who in the world would be dumb enough to buy a company's secured bonds if they thought they might end up getting 29 cents on the dollar if there was a bankruptcy?

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply

          12 Replies

          loading loading ...
        • 88%
          Wolfie20075 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          This is the best thing that could have happened for the country. If this goes to the full court it will be interesting to learn who, if any, of the justices vote to allow the deal. You don't have to be a rocket scientist, a brain surgeon or even a Supreme Court Justice to know this deal is illegal. You can't just change a contract to cheat people out of their property and then give that property to someone else. Well, that is, except in Obama's version of Amerika.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply

          3 Replies

          loading loading ...
        • 88%
          k9kssr5 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Do ya think Obama is going to sic the WH press corp on the bond holders and SC Justice Ginsburg like he threatened to?
          Be back later, gotta go get popcorn!!

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 88%
            Klarissa5 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Poll Date Sample Approve
            RCP Average 5/26 - 6/7 -- 59.4

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • 88%
              Klarissa5 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              I haven't read about it lately, but Washington Mutual filed a law suit.

              It said they they were forced to sell so quickly that their asserts were sold for less than they were worth.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              • 86%
                ranchhasawhiteass5 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                I'm glad that those investors are getting a chance fer a fair deal. Obama is most likely hoppin mad.Sure would like to be a fly on that wall.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                Reply

                2 Replies

                loading loading ...
              • 100%
                simonsez5 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                Is it too early to talk "recall"?

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
                View All 36 Comments

                Add a Comment

                Sign In With Your Propeller Account

                Forgot your password?

                Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

                To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

                More News